Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews

• Published in: Contemporary clinical trials communications 2021-09, Vol.23, p.100829-100829, Article 100829
• Main Authors: Rodríguez-Torres, Edgardo, González-Pérez, Margarita M., Díaz-Pérez, Clemente
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Barriers to clinical trial participation; Clinical trials enrollment; Clinical trials participation; Clinical trials recruitment; Facilitators to clinical trial participation; Overview of reviews
• ISSN: 2451-8654; 2451-8654
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829

The demand for clinical trial participants is today one of the highest it has ever been and continues to increase. At the same time, subject recruitment continues to be problematic and the major reason for clinical trial premature terminations. The literature on clinical trial recruitment, which spans several decades and includes hundreds of studies, has an abundance of findings that can be synthesized by way of an overview to provide a well-informed and complete picture of the factors that determine subject participation. An overview of the systematic reviews that report barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation was conducted. The extracted data were synthesized, and a thematic framework of the factors that affect subject participation in clinical trials was developed. The overview extended across medical subjects and demographics. Thirty reviews that complied with the inclusion criteria were included. These reviews covered 753 relevant primary studies and reported 881 barriers and facilitators. The barriers and facilitators were thematically synthesized and a thematic framework of 20 themes was developed. The quality of the included reviews was assessed and reported. Several opportunities to increase clinical trial participation, by developing interventions and changing the trial design, derived from an analysis of the thematic framework. That analysis also showed that most of the 20 themes operate mainly as a barrier or as a facilitator, and that most have an effect across medical subjects. As to the quality elements assessed, some reviews complied almost fully but most only partially.