Loading…
Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis
Saved in:
Published in: | Therapeutic advances in chronic disease 2019, Vol.10, p.2040622319865657-2040622319865657 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-91e67176f51ea7c87e929795661eda516923f55a4a20804f0f9d51d17f744fa83 |
container_end_page | 2040622319865657 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 2040622319865657 |
container_title | Therapeutic advances in chronic disease |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Mahdavi Fard, Ali Pourafkari, Leili Patel, Sangita P. Nader, Nader D. |
description | |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2040622319865657 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f10d26c64c1d4a209bce12289ddf41f3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2040622319865657</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f10d26c64c1d4a209bce12289ddf41f3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2273780224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-91e67176f51ea7c87e929795661eda516923f55a4a20804f0f9d51d17f744fa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkuLFDEQgBtR3GXduycJePHSmvfDgyCDj4UFBfUcatNJT4buzph0r8y_N7Mzju6CuVSofPXlVU3znODXhCj1hmKOJaWMGC2FFOpRc75PtbKmHp_mlJ01l6VscB1cMsb10-aMEU6YpvS8GVdp3EKOU4_it9lPM7r1uSwFrXZfoRT0K85rlPJdTMuMtmtwyY_LUGKIDuaYJhQntK2zWnzk-wEWl0Z4iwCNfoYWJhh2JZZnzZMAQ_GXx3jR_Pj44fvqc3v95dPV6v1167gmc2uIl4ooGQTxoJxW3lCjjJCS-A4EkYayIARwoFhjHnAwnSAdUUFxHkCzi-bq4O0SbOw2xxHyziaI9i6Rcm8hz9EN3gaCOyqd5I50e5-5cZ5Qqk3XBU4Cq653B9d2uRl95-o1Mwz3pPdXpri2fbq1UipJhaiCV0dBTj8XX2Y7xuL8MMDk01IspYopjSnlFX35AN2kJdfHqxRjROj61aZS-EC5nErJPpwOQ7Ddt4Z92Bq15MW_lzgV_GmECrQHoEDv_-76X-FvQ_7BFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331589869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mahdavi Fard, Ali ; Pourafkari, Leili ; Patel, Sangita P. ; Nader, Nader D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahdavi Fard, Ali ; Pourafkari, Leili ; Patel, Sangita P. ; Nader, Nader D.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 2040-6223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-6231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2040622319865657</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31413822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Eye surgery ; Glaucoma ; Letter to the Editor ; Medical technology ; Meta-analysis ; Stents</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2019, Vol.10, p.2040622319865657-2040622319865657</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2019. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2019 2019 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-91e67176f51ea7c87e929795661eda516923f55a4a20804f0f9d51d17f744fa83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5744-7319</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676255/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2331589869?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,21966,25753,27853,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahdavi Fard, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourafkari, Leili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sangita P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Nader D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis</title><title>Therapeutic advances in chronic disease</title><addtitle>Ther Adv Chronic Dis</addtitle><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Letter to the Editor</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Stents</subject><issn>2040-6223</issn><issn>2040-6231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkuLFDEQgBtR3GXduycJePHSmvfDgyCDj4UFBfUcatNJT4buzph0r8y_N7Mzju6CuVSofPXlVU3znODXhCj1hmKOJaWMGC2FFOpRc75PtbKmHp_mlJ01l6VscB1cMsb10-aMEU6YpvS8GVdp3EKOU4_it9lPM7r1uSwFrXZfoRT0K85rlPJdTMuMtmtwyY_LUGKIDuaYJhQntK2zWnzk-wEWl0Z4iwCNfoYWJhh2JZZnzZMAQ_GXx3jR_Pj44fvqc3v95dPV6v1167gmc2uIl4ooGQTxoJxW3lCjjJCS-A4EkYayIARwoFhjHnAwnSAdUUFxHkCzi-bq4O0SbOw2xxHyziaI9i6Rcm8hz9EN3gaCOyqd5I50e5-5cZ5Qqk3XBU4Cq653B9d2uRl95-o1Mwz3pPdXpri2fbq1UipJhaiCV0dBTj8XX2Y7xuL8MMDk01IspYopjSnlFX35AN2kJdfHqxRjROj61aZS-EC5nErJPpwOQ7Ddt4Z92Bq15MW_lzgV_GmECrQHoEDv_-76X-FvQ_7BFQ</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Mahdavi Fard, Ali</creator><creator>Pourafkari, Leili</creator><creator>Patel, Sangita P.</creator><creator>Nader, Nader D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7319</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis</title><author>Mahdavi Fard, Ali ; Pourafkari, Leili ; Patel, Sangita P. ; Nader, Nader D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-91e67176f51ea7c87e929795661eda516923f55a4a20804f0f9d51d17f744fa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Letter to the Editor</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Stents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahdavi Fard, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourafkari, Leili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sangita P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Nader D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in chronic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahdavi Fard, Ali</au><au>Pourafkari, Leili</au><au>Patel, Sangita P.</au><au>Nader, Nader D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in chronic disease</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Adv Chronic Dis</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>2040622319865657</spage><epage>2040622319865657</epage><pages>2040622319865657-2040622319865657</pages><issn>2040-6223</issn><eissn>2040-6231</eissn><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31413822</pmid><doi>10.1177/2040622319865657</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7319</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-6223 |
ispartof | Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2019, Vol.10, p.2040622319865657-2040622319865657 |
issn | 2040-6223 2040-6231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f10d26c64c1d4a209bce12289ddf41f3 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central |
subjects | Eye surgery Glaucoma Letter to the Editor Medical technology Meta-analysis Stents |
title | Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20iStent%20versus%20CyPass%20with%20or%20without%20phacoemulsification%20in%20patients%20with%20glaucoma:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20advances%20in%20chronic%20disease&rft.au=Mahdavi%20Fard,%20Ali&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=2040622319865657&rft.epage=2040622319865657&rft.pages=2040622319865657-2040622319865657&rft.issn=2040-6223&rft.eissn=2040-6231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2040622319865657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2273780224%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-91e67176f51ea7c87e929795661eda516923f55a4a20804f0f9d51d17f744fa83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331589869&rft_id=info:pmid/31413822&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2040622319865657&rfr_iscdi=true |