Loading…

Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements

Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian medical education journal 2024-11, Vol.15 (5), p.146-149
Main Authors: Braund, Heather, Turnnidge, Jennifer, Cofie, Nicholas, Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi, Greco, Sarah, Hastings-Truelove, Amber, Hill, Shannon, Dalgarno, Nancy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2514-d6d376cb24ebb6e74e86f757a6adcf6911222d228efafb15743d3aeb815905a3
container_end_page 149
container_issue 5
container_start_page 146
container_title Canadian medical education journal
container_volume 15
creator Braund, Heather
Turnnidge, Jennifer
Cofie, Nicholas
Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi
Greco, Sarah
Hastings-Truelove, Amber
Hill, Shannon
Dalgarno, Nancy
description Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present an overview of conceptions of reflexivity. Further, we offer practical guidelines for addressing and developing reflexivity statements in qualitative research. We describe reflexivity as both a concept and a deliberate ongoing process that requires a certain level of researcher consciousness, reflection, introspection, self-awareness, and an analytic attention to the researcher's role in the research process at all stages. We highlight the notion that reflexivity offers researchers an opportunity to examine potential assumptions, through the continuous process of questioning, examining, accepting, and articulating our attitudes, assumptions, perspectives, and roles. We present six recommendations to promote dialogue on the practice of reflexivity among researchers from various ontological and epistemological communities and encourage them to develop their own reflexivity practices.
doi_str_mv 10.36834/cmej.78824
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f11fe4dfbb7c463cae5f5d95fcd98614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f11fe4dfbb7c463cae5f5d95fcd98614</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3132845260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2514-d6d376cb24ebb6e74e86f757a6adcf6911222d228efafb15743d3aeb815905a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1P3DAQhq2qVUGUE3fkI1K1kPFXHHGoKlRaJCQOcLccexy8SuKtnV3Yf9-wSxHMZUYzr54Z-yXkBKpzrjQXF27A5XmtNROfyCE0jC-AVezzu_qAHJeyrOZQwCXwr-SAN1LrCupDcnkfn-mT3RY6JdrhRC3tclzRNFKPG-zTKo4dzRh6fI6bOG1pmeyEA45T-Ua-BNsXPH7NR-Th-tfD1Z_F7d3vm6uftwvHJIiFV57XyrVMYNsqrAVqFWpZW2W9C6oBYIx5xjQGG1qQteCeW2w1yKaSlh-Rmz3WJ7s0qxwHm7cm2Wh2jZQ7Y_MUXY8mAAQUPrRt7YTizqIM0jcyON9oBWJm_dizVut2QO_mZ2Tbf4B-nIzx0XRpYwCkVhVTM-HslZDT3zWWyQyxOOx7O2JaF8OBMy0kU9Us_b6XupxKmf_wbQ9UZueeeXHP7Nyb1afvT3vT_veK_wOTT5aN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132845260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Braund, Heather ; Turnnidge, Jennifer ; Cofie, Nicholas ; Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi ; Greco, Sarah ; Hastings-Truelove, Amber ; Hill, Shannon ; Dalgarno, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Braund, Heather ; Turnnidge, Jennifer ; Cofie, Nicholas ; Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi ; Greco, Sarah ; Hastings-Truelove, Amber ; Hill, Shannon ; Dalgarno, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present an overview of conceptions of reflexivity. Further, we offer practical guidelines for addressing and developing reflexivity statements in qualitative research. We describe reflexivity as both a concept and a deliberate ongoing process that requires a certain level of researcher consciousness, reflection, introspection, self-awareness, and an analytic attention to the researcher's role in the research process at all stages. We highlight the notion that reflexivity offers researchers an opportunity to examine potential assumptions, through the continuous process of questioning, examining, accepting, and articulating our attitudes, assumptions, perspectives, and roles. We present six recommendations to promote dialogue on the practice of reflexivity among researchers from various ontological and epistemological communities and encourage them to develop their own reflexivity practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36834/cmej.78824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39588017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Medical Education Journal</publisher><subject>Black Ice ; Humans ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design - standards ; Research Personnel - psychology</subject><ispartof>Canadian medical education journal, 2024-11, Vol.15 (5), p.146-149</ispartof><rights>2024 Braund, Turnnidge, Cofie, Kuforiji, Greco, Hastings-Truelove, Hill, Dalgarno; licensee Synergies Partners.</rights><rights>2024 Braund, Turnnidge, Cofie, Kuforiji, Greco, Hastings-Truelove, Hill, Dalgarno; licensee Synergies Partners. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2514-d6d376cb24ebb6e74e86f757a6adcf6911222d228efafb15743d3aeb815905a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9749-7193</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586026/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586026/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39588017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braund, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnnidge, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofie, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings-Truelove, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalgarno, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements</title><title>Canadian medical education journal</title><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><description>Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present an overview of conceptions of reflexivity. Further, we offer practical guidelines for addressing and developing reflexivity statements in qualitative research. We describe reflexivity as both a concept and a deliberate ongoing process that requires a certain level of researcher consciousness, reflection, introspection, self-awareness, and an analytic attention to the researcher's role in the research process at all stages. We highlight the notion that reflexivity offers researchers an opportunity to examine potential assumptions, through the continuous process of questioning, examining, accepting, and articulating our attitudes, assumptions, perspectives, and roles. We present six recommendations to promote dialogue on the practice of reflexivity among researchers from various ontological and epistemological communities and encourage them to develop their own reflexivity practices.</description><subject>Black Ice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Research Personnel - psychology</subject><issn>1923-1202</issn><issn>1923-1202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1P3DAQhq2qVUGUE3fkI1K1kPFXHHGoKlRaJCQOcLccexy8SuKtnV3Yf9-wSxHMZUYzr54Z-yXkBKpzrjQXF27A5XmtNROfyCE0jC-AVezzu_qAHJeyrOZQwCXwr-SAN1LrCupDcnkfn-mT3RY6JdrhRC3tclzRNFKPG-zTKo4dzRh6fI6bOG1pmeyEA45T-Ua-BNsXPH7NR-Th-tfD1Z_F7d3vm6uftwvHJIiFV57XyrVMYNsqrAVqFWpZW2W9C6oBYIx5xjQGG1qQteCeW2w1yKaSlh-Rmz3WJ7s0qxwHm7cm2Wh2jZQ7Y_MUXY8mAAQUPrRt7YTizqIM0jcyON9oBWJm_dizVut2QO_mZ2Tbf4B-nIzx0XRpYwCkVhVTM-HslZDT3zWWyQyxOOx7O2JaF8OBMy0kU9Us_b6XupxKmf_wbQ9UZueeeXHP7Nyb1afvT3vT_veK_wOTT5aN</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Braund, Heather</creator><creator>Turnnidge, Jennifer</creator><creator>Cofie, Nicholas</creator><creator>Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi</creator><creator>Greco, Sarah</creator><creator>Hastings-Truelove, Amber</creator><creator>Hill, Shannon</creator><creator>Dalgarno, Nancy</creator><general>Canadian Medical Education Journal</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-7193</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements</title><author>Braund, Heather ; Turnnidge, Jennifer ; Cofie, Nicholas ; Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi ; Greco, Sarah ; Hastings-Truelove, Amber ; Hill, Shannon ; Dalgarno, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2514-d6d376cb24ebb6e74e86f757a6adcf6911222d228efafb15743d3aeb815905a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Black Ice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Research Personnel - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braund, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnnidge, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofie, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings-Truelove, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalgarno, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braund, Heather</au><au>Turnnidge, Jennifer</au><au>Cofie, Nicholas</au><au>Kuforiji, Oluwatoyosi</au><au>Greco, Sarah</au><au>Hastings-Truelove, Amber</au><au>Hill, Shannon</au><au>Dalgarno, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements</atitle><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>146-149</pages><issn>1923-1202</issn><eissn>1923-1202</eissn><abstract>Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present an overview of conceptions of reflexivity. Further, we offer practical guidelines for addressing and developing reflexivity statements in qualitative research. We describe reflexivity as both a concept and a deliberate ongoing process that requires a certain level of researcher consciousness, reflection, introspection, self-awareness, and an analytic attention to the researcher's role in the research process at all stages. We highlight the notion that reflexivity offers researchers an opportunity to examine potential assumptions, through the continuous process of questioning, examining, accepting, and articulating our attitudes, assumptions, perspectives, and roles. We present six recommendations to promote dialogue on the practice of reflexivity among researchers from various ontological and epistemological communities and encourage them to develop their own reflexivity practices.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Medical Education Journal</pub><pmid>39588017</pmid><doi>10.36834/cmej.78824</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-7193</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1923-1202
ispartof Canadian medical education journal, 2024-11, Vol.15 (5), p.146-149
issn 1923-1202
1923-1202
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f11fe4dfbb7c463cae5f5d95fcd98614
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Black Ice
Humans
Qualitative Research
Research Design - standards
Research Personnel - psychology
title Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A02%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Six%20ways%20to%20get%20a%20grip%20on%20developing%20reflexivity%20statements&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20medical%20education%20journal&rft.au=Braund,%20Heather&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=146-149&rft.issn=1923-1202&rft.eissn=1923-1202&rft_id=info:doi/10.36834/cmej.78824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3132845260%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2514-d6d376cb24ebb6e74e86f757a6adcf6911222d228efafb15743d3aeb815905a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132845260&rft_id=info:pmid/39588017&rfr_iscdi=true