Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners

Bilateral cochlear-implant (BiCI) users are less accurate at localizing free-field (FF) sound sources than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. This performance gap is not well understood but is likely due to a combination of compromises in acoustic signal representation by the two independent speech proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in hearing 2014-11, Vol.18
Main Authors: Jones, Heath, Kan, Alan, Litovsky, Ruth Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Auditory Threshold
Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation
Cochlear Implants
Correction of Hearing Impairment - instrumentation
Cues
Humans
Middle Aged
Original
Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology
Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation
Prosthesis Design
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Sound Localization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Bilateral cochlear-implant (BiCI) users are less accurate at localizing free-field (FF) sound sources than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. This performance gap is not well understood but is likely due to a combination of compromises in acoustic signal representation by the two independent speech processors and neural degradation of auditory pathways associated with a patient's hearing loss. To exclusively investigate the effect of CI speech encoding on horizontal-plane sound localization, the present study measured sound localization performance in NH subjects listening to vocoder processed and nonvocoded virtual acoustic space (VAS) stimuli. Various aspects of BiCI stimulation such as independently functioning devices, variable across-ear channel selection, and pulsatile stimulation were simulated using uncorrelated noise (Nu), correlated noise (N0), or Gaussian-enveloped tone (GET) carriers during vocoder processing. Additionally, FF sound localization in BiCI users was measured in the same testing environment for comparison. Distinct response patterns across azimuthal locations were evident for both listener groups and were analyzed using a multilevel regression analysis. Simulated implant speech encoding, regardless of carrier, was detrimental to NH localization and the GET vocoder best simulated BiCI FF performance in NH listeners. Overall, the detrimental effect of vocoder processing on NH performance suggests that sound localization deficits may persist even for BiCI patients who have minimal neural degradation associated with their hearing loss and indicates that CI speech encoding plays a significant role in the sound localization deficits experienced by BiCI users.
ISSN:2331-2165
2331-2165
DOI:10.1177/2331216514554574