Loading…
Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control
An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta psychologica 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523 |
container_end_page | 103921 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103921 |
container_title | Acta psychologica |
container_volume | 236 |
creator | Strobach, Tilo Kürten, Jens Huestegge, Lynn |
description | An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691823000975</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2805028122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRb-AKEcuWTwK4lzQYIVj5VW4jJ3q2O3Vw6ZONiekfa2_8Af8iU4m2WPnOwuVVd1dxHyltE9o6z9MO7B5CXd7TnlokCi5-wZ2THVibrlffec7CilrG57pi7Iq5TGUkrWs5fkQnRUSdnJHTl_xhmdz6kKroq4IGS0FUwZ4wzZhzlVf-5_VwdIP-u0oPHOm-qc9lVekdvSHGGqEv464Zx9-YIdTykfS_UgaU8w1Su3CtFirEyYcwzTa_LCwZTwzeN7SQ5fvxyuvtc3P75dX326qU2ZLtfARGuddVL2zlgxSApDPzSctW5orW3tgJ0YVA_Qtl0jpRFoEBsHvOGu4eKSXG-yNsCol-iPEO90AK8fgBBvNcTszYTaMVTCCcpRSGlVOWDXCal6jrIDpmzRer9pLTGUbVPWR58MThPMGE5Jc0UbyhXjq63cqCaGlCK6J2tG9RqeHvUWnl7D01t4pe3do8NpOKJ9avqXViF83AhYTnb2GHUyHmeD1kc0uSzl_-_wFwa0r4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805028122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37084474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Dual tasking ; Humans ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Task control ; Task coordination ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Task-order control</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691823000975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3536,27905,27906,45761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürten, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Dual tasking</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Task control</subject><subject>Task coordination</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Task-order control</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRb-AKEcuWTwK4lzQYIVj5VW4jJ3q2O3Vw6ZONiekfa2_8Af8iU4m2WPnOwuVVd1dxHyltE9o6z9MO7B5CXd7TnlokCi5-wZ2THVibrlffec7CilrG57pi7Iq5TGUkrWs5fkQnRUSdnJHTl_xhmdz6kKroq4IGS0FUwZ4wzZhzlVf-5_VwdIP-u0oPHOm-qc9lVekdvSHGGqEv464Zx9-YIdTykfS_UgaU8w1Su3CtFirEyYcwzTa_LCwZTwzeN7SQ5fvxyuvtc3P75dX326qU2ZLtfARGuddVL2zlgxSApDPzSctW5orW3tgJ0YVA_Qtl0jpRFoEBsHvOGu4eKSXG-yNsCol-iPEO90AK8fgBBvNcTszYTaMVTCCcpRSGlVOWDXCal6jrIDpmzRer9pLTGUbVPWR58MThPMGE5Jc0UbyhXjq63cqCaGlCK6J2tG9RqeHvUWnl7D01t4pe3do8NpOKJ9avqXViF83AhYTnb2GHUyHmeD1kc0uSzl_-_wFwa0r4E</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Strobach, Tilo</creator><creator>Kürten, Jens</creator><creator>Huestegge, Lynn</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><author>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Dual tasking</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Task control</topic><topic>Task coordination</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Task-order control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürten, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strobach, Tilo</au><au>Kürten, Jens</au><au>Huestegge, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>236</volume><spage>103921</spage><epage>103921</epage><pages>103921-103921</pages><artnum>103921</artnum><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37084474</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921 |
issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect® |
subjects | Adjustment Dual tasking Humans Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Task control Task coordination Task Performance and Analysis Task-order control |
title | Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benefits%20of%20repeated%20alternations%20%E2%80%93%20Task-specific%20vs.%20task-general%20sequential%20adjustments%20of%20dual-task%20order%20control&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Strobach,%20Tilo&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=236&rft.spage=103921&rft.epage=103921&rft.pages=103921-103921&rft.artnum=103921&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2805028122%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805028122&rft_id=info:pmid/37084474&rfr_iscdi=true |