Loading…

Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control

An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta psychologica 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921
Main Authors: Strobach, Tilo, Kürten, Jens, Huestegge, Lynn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523
container_end_page 103921
container_issue
container_start_page 103921
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 236
creator Strobach, Tilo
Kürten, Jens
Huestegge, Lynn
description An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691823000975</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2805028122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRb-AKEcuWTwK4lzQYIVj5VW4jJ3q2O3Vw6ZONiekfa2_8Af8iU4m2WPnOwuVVd1dxHyltE9o6z9MO7B5CXd7TnlokCi5-wZ2THVibrlffec7CilrG57pi7Iq5TGUkrWs5fkQnRUSdnJHTl_xhmdz6kKroq4IGS0FUwZ4wzZhzlVf-5_VwdIP-u0oPHOm-qc9lVekdvSHGGqEv464Zx9-YIdTykfS_UgaU8w1Su3CtFirEyYcwzTa_LCwZTwzeN7SQ5fvxyuvtc3P75dX326qU2ZLtfARGuddVL2zlgxSApDPzSctW5orW3tgJ0YVA_Qtl0jpRFoEBsHvOGu4eKSXG-yNsCol-iPEO90AK8fgBBvNcTszYTaMVTCCcpRSGlVOWDXCal6jrIDpmzRer9pLTGUbVPWR58MThPMGE5Jc0UbyhXjq63cqCaGlCK6J2tG9RqeHvUWnl7D01t4pe3do8NpOKJ9avqXViF83AhYTnb2GHUyHmeD1kc0uSzl_-_wFwa0r4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805028122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37084474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Dual tasking ; Humans ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Task control ; Task coordination ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Task-order control</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691823000975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3536,27905,27906,45761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürten, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Dual tasking</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Task control</subject><subject>Task coordination</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Task-order control</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRb-AKEcuWTwK4lzQYIVj5VW4jJ3q2O3Vw6ZONiekfa2_8Af8iU4m2WPnOwuVVd1dxHyltE9o6z9MO7B5CXd7TnlokCi5-wZ2THVibrlffec7CilrG57pi7Iq5TGUkrWs5fkQnRUSdnJHTl_xhmdz6kKroq4IGS0FUwZ4wzZhzlVf-5_VwdIP-u0oPHOm-qc9lVekdvSHGGqEv464Zx9-YIdTykfS_UgaU8w1Su3CtFirEyYcwzTa_LCwZTwzeN7SQ5fvxyuvtc3P75dX326qU2ZLtfARGuddVL2zlgxSApDPzSctW5orW3tgJ0YVA_Qtl0jpRFoEBsHvOGu4eKSXG-yNsCol-iPEO90AK8fgBBvNcTszYTaMVTCCcpRSGlVOWDXCal6jrIDpmzRer9pLTGUbVPWR58MThPMGE5Jc0UbyhXjq63cqCaGlCK6J2tG9RqeHvUWnl7D01t4pe3do8NpOKJ9avqXViF83AhYTnb2GHUyHmeD1kc0uSzl_-_wFwa0r4E</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Strobach, Tilo</creator><creator>Kürten, Jens</creator><creator>Huestegge, Lynn</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</title><author>Strobach, Tilo ; Kürten, Jens ; Huestegge, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Dual tasking</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Task control</topic><topic>Task coordination</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Task-order control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Tilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürten, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huestegge, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strobach, Tilo</au><au>Kürten, Jens</au><au>Huestegge, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>236</volume><spage>103921</spage><epage>103921</epage><pages>103921-103921</pages><artnum>103921</artnum><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>An important cognitive requirement in multitasking is the decision of how multiple tasks should be temporally scheduled (task order control). Specifically, task order switches (vs. repetitions) yield performance costs (i.e., task-order switch costs), suggesting that task order scheduling is a vital part of configuring a task set. Recently, it has been shown that this process takes specific task-related characteristics into account: task order switches were easier when switching to a preferred (vs. non-preferred) task order. Here, we ask whether another determinant of task order control, namely the phenomenon that a task order switch in a previous trial facilitates a task order switch in a current trial (i.e., a sequential modulation of task order switch effect) also takes task-specific characteristics into account. Based on three experiments involving task order switches between a preferred (dominant oculomotor task prior to non-dominant manual/pedal task) and a non-preferred (vice versa) order, we replicated the finding that task order switching (in Trial N) is facilitated after a previous switch (vs. repetition in Trial N - 1) in task order. There was no substantial evidence in favor of a significant difference when switching to the preferred vs. non-preferred order and in the analyses of the dominant oculomotor task and the non-dominant manual task. This indicates different mechanisms underlying the control of immediate task order configuration (indexed by task order switch costs) and the sequential modulation of these costs based on the task order transition type in the previous trial.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37084474</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 2023-06, Vol.236, p.103921-103921, Article 103921
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1e83f302e344d82977734892e47a18d
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect®
subjects Adjustment
Dual tasking
Humans
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Task control
Task coordination
Task Performance and Analysis
Task-order control
title Benefits of repeated alternations – Task-specific vs. task-general sequential adjustments of dual-task order control
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benefits%20of%20repeated%20alternations%20%E2%80%93%20Task-specific%20vs.%20task-general%20sequential%20adjustments%20of%20dual-task%20order%20control&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Strobach,%20Tilo&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=236&rft.spage=103921&rft.epage=103921&rft.pages=103921-103921&rft.artnum=103921&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2805028122%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a136dfdf449fcd3b40ab9b5216fb6dd6dbe73b89aa667544c3ecee5fa252f523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805028122&rft_id=info:pmid/37084474&rfr_iscdi=true