Loading…

Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates

Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency tones and the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds are considered comparable, particularly for envelopes shaped to transmit similar fidelity of temporal information normally present for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in hearing 2015-12, Vol.19
Main Authors: Monaghan, Jessica J. M., Bleeck, Stefan, McAlpine, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Trends in hearing
container_volume 19
creator Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
Bleeck, Stefan
McAlpine, David
description Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency tones and the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds are considered comparable, particularly for envelopes shaped to transmit similar fidelity of temporal information normally present for low-frequency sounds. Nevertheless, discrimination performance for envelope modulation rates above a few hundred Hertz is reported to be poor—to the point of discrimination thresholds being unattainable—compared with the much higher (>1,000 Hz) limit for low-frequency ITD sensitivity, suggesting the presence of a low-pass filter in the envelope domain. Further, performance for identical modulation rates appears to decline with increasing carrier frequency, supporting the view that the low-pass characteristics observed for envelope ITD processing is carrier-frequency dependent. Here, we assessed listeners’ sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in pure tones and in the modulated envelopes of high-frequency tones. ITD discrimination for the modulated high-frequency tones was measured as a function of both modulation rate and carrier frequency. Some well-trained listeners appear able to discriminate ITDs extremely well, even at modulation rates well beyond 500 Hz, for 4-kHz carriers. For one listener, thresholds were even obtained for a modulation rate of 800 Hz. The highest modulation rate for which thresholds could be obtained declined with increasing carrier frequency for all listeners. At 10 kHz, the highest modulation rate at which thresholds could be obtained was 600 Hz. The upper limit of sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in the envelope of high-frequency modulated sounds appears to be higher than previously considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2331216515619331
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f225203a09a3472fa4222f593e396e84</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2331216515619331</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f225203a09a3472fa4222f593e396e84</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2331216515619331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rGzEQxUVpaEKSe09FX2Bb_VlJq0uhpGljcCk0yVnMrkaOzHplJNmQb5913Yak0NMMT_N-g-YR8p6zj5wb80lIyQXXiivN7dy_IWcHqTlob1_0p-SylDVjjAuljBbvyKnQRnAr9BlZ3uJUYo37WB9pTfR62uOYtkgXU8UMuwwjvYsbpF9jCJhxGrBQqPQmrh7oj-R3I9SYJvoLKpYLchJgLHj5p56T-2_Xd1c3zfLn98XVl2UzKMZq48UAoEOnkTNpOilQguqhw54H2yvbIrfWtx64MGwI3gMq3cLQB2lkaL08J4sj1ydYu22OG8iPLkF0v4WUVw5yjcOILgihBJPALMjWiACtECIoK1FajV07sz4fWdtdv0E_4FTnP7-Cvn6Z4oNbpb1rO8MFszOAHQFDTqVkDM9eztwhKPdvULPlw8udz4a_scwDzXGgwArdOu3yNN_z_8AnckWbbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Monaghan, Jessica J. M. ; Bleeck, Stefan ; McAlpine, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jessica J. M. ; Bleeck, Stefan ; McAlpine, David</creatorcontrib><description>Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency tones and the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds are considered comparable, particularly for envelopes shaped to transmit similar fidelity of temporal information normally present for low-frequency sounds. Nevertheless, discrimination performance for envelope modulation rates above a few hundred Hertz is reported to be poor—to the point of discrimination thresholds being unattainable—compared with the much higher (&gt;1,000 Hz) limit for low-frequency ITD sensitivity, suggesting the presence of a low-pass filter in the envelope domain. Further, performance for identical modulation rates appears to decline with increasing carrier frequency, supporting the view that the low-pass characteristics observed for envelope ITD processing is carrier-frequency dependent. Here, we assessed listeners’ sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in pure tones and in the modulated envelopes of high-frequency tones. ITD discrimination for the modulated high-frequency tones was measured as a function of both modulation rate and carrier frequency. Some well-trained listeners appear able to discriminate ITDs extremely well, even at modulation rates well beyond 500 Hz, for 4-kHz carriers. For one listener, thresholds were even obtained for a modulation rate of 800 Hz. The highest modulation rate for which thresholds could be obtained declined with increasing carrier frequency for all listeners. At 10 kHz, the highest modulation rate at which thresholds could be obtained was 600 Hz. The upper limit of sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in the envelope of high-frequency modulated sounds appears to be higher than previously considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2331216515619331</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26721926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Analysis of Variance ; Auditory Pathways - physiology ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Female ; Hearing - physiology ; Humans ; Loudness Perception - physiology ; Male ; Noise - prevention &amp; control ; Pitch Discrimination - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reference Values ; Sampling Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sound Localization - physiology ; Special Issue</subject><ispartof>Trends in hearing, 2015-12, Vol.19</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015 2015 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871209/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871209/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21957,27844,27915,27916,44936,45324,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jessica J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleeck, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, David</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates</title><title>Trends in hearing</title><addtitle>Trends Amplif</addtitle><description>Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency tones and the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds are considered comparable, particularly for envelopes shaped to transmit similar fidelity of temporal information normally present for low-frequency sounds. Nevertheless, discrimination performance for envelope modulation rates above a few hundred Hertz is reported to be poor—to the point of discrimination thresholds being unattainable—compared with the much higher (&gt;1,000 Hz) limit for low-frequency ITD sensitivity, suggesting the presence of a low-pass filter in the envelope domain. Further, performance for identical modulation rates appears to decline with increasing carrier frequency, supporting the view that the low-pass characteristics observed for envelope ITD processing is carrier-frequency dependent. Here, we assessed listeners’ sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in pure tones and in the modulated envelopes of high-frequency tones. ITD discrimination for the modulated high-frequency tones was measured as a function of both modulation rate and carrier frequency. Some well-trained listeners appear able to discriminate ITDs extremely well, even at modulation rates well beyond 500 Hz, for 4-kHz carriers. For one listener, thresholds were even obtained for a modulation rate of 800 Hz. The highest modulation rate for which thresholds could be obtained declined with increasing carrier frequency for all listeners. At 10 kHz, the highest modulation rate at which thresholds could be obtained was 600 Hz. The upper limit of sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in the envelope of high-frequency modulated sounds appears to be higher than previously considered.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Auditory Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loudness Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Noise - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sound Localization - physiology</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><issn>2331-2165</issn><issn>2331-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9rGzEQxUVpaEKSe09FX2Bb_VlJq0uhpGljcCk0yVnMrkaOzHplJNmQb5913Yak0NMMT_N-g-YR8p6zj5wb80lIyQXXiivN7dy_IWcHqTlob1_0p-SylDVjjAuljBbvyKnQRnAr9BlZ3uJUYo37WB9pTfR62uOYtkgXU8UMuwwjvYsbpF9jCJhxGrBQqPQmrh7oj-R3I9SYJvoLKpYLchJgLHj5p56T-2_Xd1c3zfLn98XVl2UzKMZq48UAoEOnkTNpOilQguqhw54H2yvbIrfWtx64MGwI3gMq3cLQB2lkaL08J4sj1ydYu22OG8iPLkF0v4WUVw5yjcOILgihBJPALMjWiACtECIoK1FajV07sz4fWdtdv0E_4FTnP7-Cvn6Z4oNbpb1rO8MFszOAHQFDTqVkDM9eztwhKPdvULPlw8udz4a_scwDzXGgwArdOu3yNN_z_8AnckWbbA</recordid><startdate>20151230</startdate><enddate>20151230</enddate><creator>Monaghan, Jessica J. M.</creator><creator>Bleeck, Stefan</creator><creator>McAlpine, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151230</creationdate><title>Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates</title><author>Monaghan, Jessica J. M. ; Bleeck, Stefan ; McAlpine, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Auditory Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loudness Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Noise - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pitch Discrimination - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sound Localization - physiology</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jessica J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleeck, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, David</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Trends in hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monaghan, Jessica J. M.</au><au>Bleeck, Stefan</au><au>McAlpine, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates</atitle><jtitle>Trends in hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Amplif</addtitle><date>2015-12-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issn>2331-2165</issn><eissn>2331-2165</eissn><abstract>Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the temporal fine structure of low-frequency tones and the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds are considered comparable, particularly for envelopes shaped to transmit similar fidelity of temporal information normally present for low-frequency sounds. Nevertheless, discrimination performance for envelope modulation rates above a few hundred Hertz is reported to be poor—to the point of discrimination thresholds being unattainable—compared with the much higher (&gt;1,000 Hz) limit for low-frequency ITD sensitivity, suggesting the presence of a low-pass filter in the envelope domain. Further, performance for identical modulation rates appears to decline with increasing carrier frequency, supporting the view that the low-pass characteristics observed for envelope ITD processing is carrier-frequency dependent. Here, we assessed listeners’ sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in pure tones and in the modulated envelopes of high-frequency tones. ITD discrimination for the modulated high-frequency tones was measured as a function of both modulation rate and carrier frequency. Some well-trained listeners appear able to discriminate ITDs extremely well, even at modulation rates well beyond 500 Hz, for 4-kHz carriers. For one listener, thresholds were even obtained for a modulation rate of 800 Hz. The highest modulation rate for which thresholds could be obtained declined with increasing carrier frequency for all listeners. At 10 kHz, the highest modulation rate at which thresholds could be obtained was 600 Hz. The upper limit of sensitivity to ITDs conveyed in the envelope of high-frequency modulated sounds appears to be higher than previously considered.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26721926</pmid><doi>10.1177/2331216515619331</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2331-2165
ispartof Trends in hearing, 2015-12, Vol.19
issn 2331-2165
2331-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f225203a09a3472fa4222f593e396e84
source SAGE Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Analysis of Variance
Auditory Pathways - physiology
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Female
Hearing - physiology
Humans
Loudness Perception - physiology
Male
Noise - prevention & control
Pitch Discrimination - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Reference Values
Sampling Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sound Localization - physiology
Special Issue
title Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20to%20Envelope%20Interaural%20Time%20Differences%20at%20High%20Modulation%20Rates&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20hearing&rft.au=Monaghan,%20Jessica%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2015-12-30&rft.volume=19&rft.issn=2331-2165&rft.eissn=2331-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2331216515619331&rft_dat=%3Csage_doaj_%3E10.1177_2331216515619331%3C/sage_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-d2caa6f86e1037832e3a5ba8eb1f9b594e199d4da1270cfddae564acbf373f4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26721926&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2331216515619331&rfr_iscdi=true