Loading…
A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination
Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC gastroenterology 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3 |
container_end_page | 433 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 433 |
container_title | BMC gastroenterology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Wiener, Gregory Winkle, Peter McGowan, John D Cleveland, Mark vB Di Palma, Jack A |
description | Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy.
This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD.
Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink.
The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www.
gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A776046969</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A776046969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZdNMWXjO2s0KiiUKkSLEBiZ504xzMZMnawkym8Cw-LZ6a3QcgL377z-aK_KF4zes6Ylu8S41rJknJRUkFlXeonxTGrFCu5oN-fPhofFS9SWlHKlObieXEkNNWcC3Zc_JmTL0tISDjBDfQTjF3wJDgCxOMNcT1sQsSWDLgg4FuSpt7BiCSFftqhNqwH2BJjyAAJG4zluMTShsmPGEkPv7Jzg2cPiiHEMZE2dv4HacIN9mSImCVwJ2w6vxu_LJ456BO-uu1Pim-XH75efCqvP3-8uphfl3Ymq7FUTPO2Yo10yFRdN1xScJUGbOoZzVPgjLdoBW-qWoFsWmebutLUVi3KVjTipLjae9sAKzPEbg3xtwnQmd1CiAsDcexsj8bxGdjKWSqAV7VwWkqr2EwhUOsEQna937uGqVlja9GPEfoD6eGO75ZmETaGUcU4EyobTm8NMfycMI1m3SWLfQ8ew5QMrynP12czmdG3_6CrMEWf_2pHMSYqWj9QC8gv6LwL-WC7lZq5UpJWspZb6vw_VG4trjsbPLourx8U8H2BjSGliO7-kYyabUDNPqAmB9TsAmp0Lnrz-HvuS-4SKf4CYhbi6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902113409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><description>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy.
This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD.
Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink.
The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www.
gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38082231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Bowel and bladder training ; Bowel prepration ; Cancer screening ; Colon ; Colon cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Composition ; Dosage and administration ; Drug dosages ; Electrolytes ; FDA approval ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal agents ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Health aspects ; Hypertension ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Intestine ; Intubation ; Ischemia ; Isotonic beverages ; Laxative ; Laxatives ; Medical screening ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Polyethylene glycol ; Questionnaires ; Ratings & rankings ; Sodium ; Sports drink ; Sports drinks ; Success ; Surveillance ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>BMC gastroenterology, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433</ispartof><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712137/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113409?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38082231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Mark vB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><title>BMC gastroenterology</title><addtitle>BMC Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy.
This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD.
Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink.
The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www.
gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</description><subject>Bowel and bladder training</subject><subject>Bowel prepration</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal agents</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Isotonic beverages</subject><subject>Laxative</subject><subject>Laxatives</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sports drink</subject><subject>Sports drinks</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1471-230X</issn><issn>1471-230X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZdNMWXjO2s0KiiUKkSLEBiZ504xzMZMnawkym8Cw-LZ6a3QcgL377z-aK_KF4zes6Ylu8S41rJknJRUkFlXeonxTGrFCu5oN-fPhofFS9SWlHKlObieXEkNNWcC3Zc_JmTL0tISDjBDfQTjF3wJDgCxOMNcT1sQsSWDLgg4FuSpt7BiCSFftqhNqwH2BJjyAAJG4zluMTShsmPGEkPv7Jzg2cPiiHEMZE2dv4HacIN9mSImCVwJ2w6vxu_LJ456BO-uu1Pim-XH75efCqvP3-8uphfl3Ymq7FUTPO2Yo10yFRdN1xScJUGbOoZzVPgjLdoBW-qWoFsWmebutLUVi3KVjTipLjae9sAKzPEbg3xtwnQmd1CiAsDcexsj8bxGdjKWSqAV7VwWkqr2EwhUOsEQna937uGqVlja9GPEfoD6eGO75ZmETaGUcU4EyobTm8NMfycMI1m3SWLfQ8ew5QMrynP12czmdG3_6CrMEWf_2pHMSYqWj9QC8gv6LwL-WC7lZq5UpJWspZb6vw_VG4trjsbPLourx8U8H2BjSGliO7-kYyabUDNPqAmB9TsAmp0Lnrz-HvuS-4SKf4CYhbi6A</recordid><startdate>20231211</startdate><enddate>20231211</enddate><creator>Wiener, Gregory</creator><creator>Winkle, Peter</creator><creator>McGowan, John D</creator><creator>Cleveland, Mark vB</creator><creator>Di Palma, Jack A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231211</creationdate><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><author>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bowel and bladder training</topic><topic>Bowel prepration</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal agents</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Isotonic beverages</topic><topic>Laxative</topic><topic>Laxatives</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sports drink</topic><topic>Sports drinks</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Mark vB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiener, Gregory</au><au>Winkle, Peter</au><au>McGowan, John D</au><au>Cleveland, Mark vB</au><au>Di Palma, Jack A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</atitle><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-12-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>433-433</pages><artnum>433</artnum><issn>1471-230X</issn><eissn>1471-230X</eissn><abstract>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy.
This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD.
Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink.
The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www.
gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38082231</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-230X |
ispartof | BMC gastroenterology, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433 |
issn | 1471-230X 1471-230X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bowel and bladder training Bowel prepration Cancer screening Colon Colon cancer Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Composition Dosage and administration Drug dosages Electrolytes FDA approval Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal agents Gastrointestinal surgery Health aspects Hypertension Inflammatory bowel disease Intestine Intubation Ischemia Isotonic beverages Laxative Laxatives Medical screening Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Polyethylene glycol Questionnaires Ratings & rankings Sodium Sports drink Sports drinks Success Surveillance Vomiting |
title | A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Phase%202%20evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20flavored%20peg%20and%20sulfate%20solution%20compared%20to%20an%20over-the-counter%20laxative,%20peg%20and%20sports%20drink%20bowel%20preparation%20combination&rft.jtitle=BMC%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Wiener,%20Gregory&rft.date=2023-12-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=433-433&rft.artnum=433&rft.issn=1471-230X&rft.eissn=1471-230X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA776046969%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902113409&rft_id=info:pmid/38082231&rft_galeid=A776046969&rfr_iscdi=true |