Loading…

A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination

Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC gastroenterology 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433
Main Authors: Wiener, Gregory, Winkle, Peter, McGowan, John D, Cleveland, Mark vB, Di Palma, Jack A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3
container_end_page 433
container_issue 1
container_start_page 433
container_title BMC gastroenterology
container_volume 23
creator Wiener, Gregory
Winkle, Peter
McGowan, John D
Cleveland, Mark vB
Di Palma, Jack A
description Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy. This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD. Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink. The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www. gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A776046969</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A776046969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZdNMWXjO2s0KiiUKkSLEBiZ504xzMZMnawkym8Cw-LZ6a3QcgL377z-aK_KF4zes6Ylu8S41rJknJRUkFlXeonxTGrFCu5oN-fPhofFS9SWlHKlObieXEkNNWcC3Zc_JmTL0tISDjBDfQTjF3wJDgCxOMNcT1sQsSWDLgg4FuSpt7BiCSFftqhNqwH2BJjyAAJG4zluMTShsmPGEkPv7Jzg2cPiiHEMZE2dv4HacIN9mSImCVwJ2w6vxu_LJ456BO-uu1Pim-XH75efCqvP3-8uphfl3Ymq7FUTPO2Yo10yFRdN1xScJUGbOoZzVPgjLdoBW-qWoFsWmebutLUVi3KVjTipLjae9sAKzPEbg3xtwnQmd1CiAsDcexsj8bxGdjKWSqAV7VwWkqr2EwhUOsEQna937uGqVlja9GPEfoD6eGO75ZmETaGUcU4EyobTm8NMfycMI1m3SWLfQ8ew5QMrynP12czmdG3_6CrMEWf_2pHMSYqWj9QC8gv6LwL-WC7lZq5UpJWspZb6vw_VG4trjsbPLourx8U8H2BjSGliO7-kYyabUDNPqAmB9TsAmp0Lnrz-HvuS-4SKf4CYhbi6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902113409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><description>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy. This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD. Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink. The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www. gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38082231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Bowel and bladder training ; Bowel prepration ; Cancer screening ; Colon ; Colon cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Composition ; Dosage and administration ; Drug dosages ; Electrolytes ; FDA approval ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal agents ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Health aspects ; Hypertension ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Intestine ; Intubation ; Ischemia ; Isotonic beverages ; Laxative ; Laxatives ; Medical screening ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Polyethylene glycol ; Questionnaires ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Sodium ; Sports drink ; Sports drinks ; Success ; Surveillance ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>BMC gastroenterology, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433</ispartof><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712137/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113409?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38082231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Mark vB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><title>BMC gastroenterology</title><addtitle>BMC Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy. This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD. Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink. The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www. gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</description><subject>Bowel and bladder training</subject><subject>Bowel prepration</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal agents</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Isotonic beverages</subject><subject>Laxative</subject><subject>Laxatives</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sports drink</subject><subject>Sports drinks</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1471-230X</issn><issn>1471-230X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZdNMWXjO2s0KiiUKkSLEBiZ504xzMZMnawkym8Cw-LZ6a3QcgL377z-aK_KF4zes6Ylu8S41rJknJRUkFlXeonxTGrFCu5oN-fPhofFS9SWlHKlObieXEkNNWcC3Zc_JmTL0tISDjBDfQTjF3wJDgCxOMNcT1sQsSWDLgg4FuSpt7BiCSFftqhNqwH2BJjyAAJG4zluMTShsmPGEkPv7Jzg2cPiiHEMZE2dv4HacIN9mSImCVwJ2w6vxu_LJ456BO-uu1Pim-XH75efCqvP3-8uphfl3Ymq7FUTPO2Yo10yFRdN1xScJUGbOoZzVPgjLdoBW-qWoFsWmebutLUVi3KVjTipLjae9sAKzPEbg3xtwnQmd1CiAsDcexsj8bxGdjKWSqAV7VwWkqr2EwhUOsEQna937uGqVlja9GPEfoD6eGO75ZmETaGUcU4EyobTm8NMfycMI1m3SWLfQ8ew5QMrynP12czmdG3_6CrMEWf_2pHMSYqWj9QC8gv6LwL-WC7lZq5UpJWspZb6vw_VG4trjsbPLourx8U8H2BjSGliO7-kYyabUDNPqAmB9TsAmp0Lnrz-HvuS-4SKf4CYhbi6A</recordid><startdate>20231211</startdate><enddate>20231211</enddate><creator>Wiener, Gregory</creator><creator>Winkle, Peter</creator><creator>McGowan, John D</creator><creator>Cleveland, Mark vB</creator><creator>Di Palma, Jack A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231211</creationdate><title>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</title><author>Wiener, Gregory ; Winkle, Peter ; McGowan, John D ; Cleveland, Mark vB ; Di Palma, Jack A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bowel and bladder training</topic><topic>Bowel prepration</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal agents</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Isotonic beverages</topic><topic>Laxative</topic><topic>Laxatives</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sports drink</topic><topic>Sports drinks</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Mark vB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Palma, Jack A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiener, Gregory</au><au>Winkle, Peter</au><au>McGowan, John D</au><au>Cleveland, Mark vB</au><au>Di Palma, Jack A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination</atitle><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-12-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>433-433</pages><artnum>433</artnum><issn>1471-230X</issn><eissn>1471-230X</eissn><abstract>Acceptability and tolerance of bowel preparation is critical to overcome patient hesitancy in undergoing colon cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy. To improve patient experience, a new sports drink-flavored bowel preparation containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sulfate salts (FPSS) was developed to provide a similar experience to a commonly used but not United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved PEG and sports drink bowel preparation (PEG-SD), while also achieving improved cleansing efficacy. This FPSS preparation, approved by the FDA in June 2023, was evaluated in a non-randomized Phase 2 study in which 40 patients requiring colonoscopy were prepared with FPSS and 20 with PEG-SD. Overall cleansing success was high with FPSS based on unblinded local endoscopist assessment (93%) and blinded central reading (97%), exceeding PEG-SD which achieved success rates of 84% (local read), 74% and 68% (blinded central reads). Similar differences favoring FPSS were seen for excellent preparations and cleansing success by colon segment as rated by local endoscopists. Both preparations were well-tolerated, with 93% of FPSS patients rating their preparation as Tolerable to Very Easy to consume, compared to 100% of PEG-SD. Patients who had previously taken a preparation for colonoscopy found FPSS and PEG-SD better than their prior preparation (73% and 70%, respectively) and nearly all would request their assigned study preparation again in the future. About two thirds of FPSS patients agreed that the preparation tasted similar to a sports drink. The new sports drink-like flavored preparation compares favorably to PEG-SD for bowel cleansing efficacy while achieving similar patient satisfaction. The study was registered at www. gov (NCT03328507) on 01/11/2017.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38082231</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-230X
ispartof BMC gastroenterology, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1), p.433-433, Article 433
issn 1471-230X
1471-230X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f25ac4fc03a2493f866c7157ea0cf3ea
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Bowel and bladder training
Bowel prepration
Cancer screening
Colon
Colon cancer
Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer
Composition
Dosage and administration
Drug dosages
Electrolytes
FDA approval
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal agents
Gastrointestinal surgery
Health aspects
Hypertension
Inflammatory bowel disease
Intestine
Intubation
Ischemia
Isotonic beverages
Laxative
Laxatives
Medical screening
Patient outcomes
Patient satisfaction
Polyethylene glycol
Questionnaires
Ratings & rankings
Sodium
Sports drink
Sports drinks
Success
Surveillance
Vomiting
title A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Phase%202%20evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20flavored%20peg%20and%20sulfate%20solution%20compared%20to%20an%20over-the-counter%20laxative,%20peg%20and%20sports%20drink%20bowel%20preparation%20combination&rft.jtitle=BMC%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Wiener,%20Gregory&rft.date=2023-12-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=433-433&rft.artnum=433&rft.issn=1471-230X&rft.eissn=1471-230X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA776046969%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7182d41b6fe1799b260af48aeb9509b2a212dec32b497a6bdfcb9480c4de6d3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902113409&rft_id=info:pmid/38082231&rft_galeid=A776046969&rfr_iscdi=true