Loading…
Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference?
Substantial literature indicates that genders differ in terms of risk perception and values regarding wildlife management. Lack of equal stakeholder representation is also documented, which can also impact the effectiveness of human-wildlife conflict resolution interventions and education and outrea...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Agriculture (Basel) 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.329 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793 |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 329 |
| container_title | Agriculture (Basel) |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Bampasidou, Maria Kaller, Michael D. Tanger, Shaun M. |
| description | Substantial literature indicates that genders differ in terms of risk perception and values regarding wildlife management. Lack of equal stakeholder representation is also documented, which can also impact the effectiveness of human-wildlife conflict resolution interventions and education and outreach efforts. This paper investigates gender differences in perceptions about risks and potential adverse impacts on production, health, environment, safety, and population management posed by wild pigs. A survey was used to collect data from a random sample of adult residents (N = 1221) in Louisiana. We analyzed responses from 226 female and 832 male producers. We observed differences in how these groups perceive production risk and health risk. No distinct differences were found on how the two genders perceive wild pig impact on natural resources and safety. No difference is reported on how the two genders consider the management of the wild pig population. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agriculture11040329 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f2dfb6deb0af464e8080880e8fb3c931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f2dfb6deb0af464e8080880e8fb3c931</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2528295952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUcFKAzEQXUTBUvsFXgKeq9lku8l4EalaCwWLVjyGJDtp065NTbYHb_6Gv-eXuFoRD84cZubx5s3Ay7LjnJ5yDvRMz6O327rZRsxzWlDOYC_rMCpEnxaC7f_pD7NeSkvaBuRc0rKTTR4avcJFqCuMH2_vidz7tCJTjBY3jQ_rRIIjT76uyNTP0zkZJzJbYESiyQjX7RK58s61wNrixVF24HSdsPdTu9njzfVseNuf3I3Gw8tJ3_JcNv0BgKwAtLVFhQAGnKWOGsHQMZ0jRSaMcUIbA1Dash0FL8DKUktmhQDezcY73SropdpE_6zjqwraq28gxLnSsfG2RuVY5UxZoaHaFWWBkrYpKUpnuAWet1onO61NDC9bTI1ahm1ct-8rNmCSwQAGrGXxHcvGkFJE93s1p-rLBfWPC_wT79B9-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528295952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Bampasidou, Maria ; Kaller, Michael D. ; Tanger, Shaun M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bampasidou, Maria ; Kaller, Michael D. ; Tanger, Shaun M.</creatorcontrib><description>Substantial literature indicates that genders differ in terms of risk perception and values regarding wildlife management. Lack of equal stakeholder representation is also documented, which can also impact the effectiveness of human-wildlife conflict resolution interventions and education and outreach efforts. This paper investigates gender differences in perceptions about risks and potential adverse impacts on production, health, environment, safety, and population management posed by wild pigs. A survey was used to collect data from a random sample of adult residents (N = 1221) in Louisiana. We analyzed responses from 226 female and 832 male producers. We observed differences in how these groups perceive production risk and health risk. No distinct differences were found on how the two genders perceive wild pig impact on natural resources and safety. No difference is reported on how the two genders consider the management of the wild pig population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11040329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal populations ; Decision making ; Environmental management ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Health risks ; Hogs ; human-wildlife conflicts ; Natural resources ; Perceptions ; Risk perception ; Safety management ; Sex differences ; wild pigs ; wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Agriculture (Basel), 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.329</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9980-1868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2528295952/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2528295952?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bampasidou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaller, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanger, Shaun M.</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference?</title><title>Agriculture (Basel)</title><description>Substantial literature indicates that genders differ in terms of risk perception and values regarding wildlife management. Lack of equal stakeholder representation is also documented, which can also impact the effectiveness of human-wildlife conflict resolution interventions and education and outreach efforts. This paper investigates gender differences in perceptions about risks and potential adverse impacts on production, health, environment, safety, and population management posed by wild pigs. A survey was used to collect data from a random sample of adult residents (N = 1221) in Louisiana. We analyzed responses from 226 female and 832 male producers. We observed differences in how these groups perceive production risk and health risk. No distinct differences were found on how the two genders perceive wild pig impact on natural resources and safety. No difference is reported on how the two genders consider the management of the wild pig population.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>human-wildlife conflicts</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>wild pigs</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>2077-0472</issn><issn>2077-0472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUcFKAzEQXUTBUvsFXgKeq9lku8l4EalaCwWLVjyGJDtp065NTbYHb_6Gv-eXuFoRD84cZubx5s3Ay7LjnJ5yDvRMz6O327rZRsxzWlDOYC_rMCpEnxaC7f_pD7NeSkvaBuRc0rKTTR4avcJFqCuMH2_vidz7tCJTjBY3jQ_rRIIjT76uyNTP0zkZJzJbYESiyQjX7RK58s61wNrixVF24HSdsPdTu9njzfVseNuf3I3Gw8tJ3_JcNv0BgKwAtLVFhQAGnKWOGsHQMZ0jRSaMcUIbA1Dash0FL8DKUktmhQDezcY73SropdpE_6zjqwraq28gxLnSsfG2RuVY5UxZoaHaFWWBkrYpKUpnuAWet1onO61NDC9bTI1ahm1ct-8rNmCSwQAGrGXxHcvGkFJE93s1p-rLBfWPC_wT79B9-Q</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Bampasidou, Maria</creator><creator>Kaller, Michael D.</creator><creator>Tanger, Shaun M.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-1868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference?</title><author>Bampasidou, Maria ; Kaller, Michael D. ; Tanger, Shaun M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>human-wildlife conflicts</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>wild pigs</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bampasidou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaller, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanger, Shaun M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bampasidou, Maria</au><au>Kaller, Michael D.</au><au>Tanger, Shaun M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference?</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>329</spage><pages>329-</pages><issn>2077-0472</issn><eissn>2077-0472</eissn><abstract>Substantial literature indicates that genders differ in terms of risk perception and values regarding wildlife management. Lack of equal stakeholder representation is also documented, which can also impact the effectiveness of human-wildlife conflict resolution interventions and education and outreach efforts. This paper investigates gender differences in perceptions about risks and potential adverse impacts on production, health, environment, safety, and population management posed by wild pigs. A survey was used to collect data from a random sample of adult residents (N = 1221) in Louisiana. We analyzed responses from 226 female and 832 male producers. We observed differences in how these groups perceive production risk and health risk. No distinct differences were found on how the two genders perceive wild pig impact on natural resources and safety. No difference is reported on how the two genders consider the management of the wild pig population.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agriculture11040329</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-1868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2077-0472 |
| ispartof | Agriculture (Basel), 2021-04, Vol.11 (4), p.329 |
| issn | 2077-0472 2077-0472 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f2dfb6deb0af464e8080880e8fb3c931 |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
| subjects | Agriculture Animal populations Decision making Environmental management Gender Gender aspects Gender differences Health risks Hogs human-wildlife conflicts Natural resources Perceptions Risk perception Safety management Sex differences wild pigs wildlife Wildlife management |
| title | Stakeholder’s Risk Perceptions of Wild Pigs: Is There a Gender Difference? |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%E2%80%99s%20Risk%20Perceptions%20of%20Wild%20Pigs:%20Is%20There%20a%20Gender%20Difference?&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20(Basel)&rft.au=Bampasidou,%20Maria&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=329&rft.pages=329-&rft.issn=2077-0472&rft.eissn=2077-0472&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agriculture11040329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2528295952%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-5998d99acc4de99b9fc0f0b72ef2a1e0e27bbf7abb996c6e277349c86a82c7793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528295952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |