Loading…

Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver

After several years of public road testing, the commercial deployment of fully autonomous vehicles—or Automated Driving Systems (ADS)—is poised to scale substantially following significant technological advancements and recent regulatory approvals. However, the fundamental question of whether an ADS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heliyon 2024-07, Vol.10 (14), p.e34379, Article e34379
Main Authors: Di Lillo, Luigi, Gode, Tilia, Zhou, Xilin, Atzei, Margherita, Chen, Ruoshu, Victor, Trent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-20df44ff81ded6787461d665e510dfdd85b8e61490cff979fbabbe16791bb6b23
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page e34379
container_title Heliyon
container_volume 10
creator Di Lillo, Luigi
Gode, Tilia
Zhou, Xilin
Atzei, Margherita
Chen, Ruoshu
Victor, Trent
description After several years of public road testing, the commercial deployment of fully autonomous vehicles—or Automated Driving Systems (ADS)—is poised to scale substantially following significant technological advancements and recent regulatory approvals. However, the fundamental question of whether an ADS is safer than its human counterparts remain largely unsolved due to several challenges in establishing an appropriate real-world safety comparison method. As scaling ensues, the lack of an established method can contribute to misinterpretations or uncertainties regarding ADS safety and impede the continuous and consistent assessment of ADS performance. This study introduces three research developments to define a robust and replicable safety comparison method to address this critical methodological gap. First, we introduce the use of liability insurance claims data to measure the comparative safety between ADS and human drivers. Second, we use Swiss Re insurance claims data to establish the first zip code- and responsibility-calibrated human performance benchmark, composed of over 600,000 private passenger vehicle claims and 125 billion miles of driving exposure. Third, we perform a case study by applying the developed baseline to evaluate the safety impact of the Waymo Driver. We find that when benchmarked against zip code-calibrated human baselines, the Waymo Driver significantly improves safety towards other road users. The comparison method established in this study can be replicated for other regions or ADS deployments to aid the decision-making of ADS safety stakeholders such as regulators, and instill trust in the general public.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34379
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f30b933b6ca34f30aaf808341e14f9ae</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405844024104100</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f30b933b6ca34f30aaf808341e14f9ae</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3090635594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-20df44ff81ded6787461d665e510dfdd85b8e61490cff979fbabbe16791bb6b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv3CAUha2qVROl-QmtWHbjKZiHTTdVNH1FitRNqy4RhkuGkW2mgCfyvy-TmabJKise95wPLpyqekvwimAiPmxXGxj8EqZVgxu2AspoK19U5w3DvO4Ywy8fzc-qy5S2GGPCOyFb-ro6o5IQhklzXg3rMO501NnvASXtIC9oB9GFOOrJAAoO6TmHKYxhTjXSk0WbuZSQjcUR00d0hSLoob4LcbDI6FQwebbLwZk3gH7rZQzo8736TfXK6SHB5Wm8qH59_fJz_b2--fHten11UxvGeK4bbB1jznXEghVt1zJBrBAcOCkVazvedyAIk9g4J1vpet33QEQrSd-LvqEX1fWRa4Peql30o46LCtqr-40Qb5WO2ZsBlKO4l5T2wmjKykJr1-GOMgKEOamhsD4dWbu5H8EamHLUwxPo08rkN-o27BUhFHMiZCG8PxFi-DNDymr0ycAw6AnKoypKOO1Iyzr-vBRLLCjnkhUpP0pNDClFcA9XIlgdQqK26hQSdQiJOoak-N497ufB9S8S_xuG8kN7D1El46FkwfoIJpcn9M8c8RdxQtJ3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090635594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Di Lillo, Luigi ; Gode, Tilia ; Zhou, Xilin ; Atzei, Margherita ; Chen, Ruoshu ; Victor, Trent</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Lillo, Luigi ; Gode, Tilia ; Zhou, Xilin ; Atzei, Margherita ; Chen, Ruoshu ; Victor, Trent</creatorcontrib><description>After several years of public road testing, the commercial deployment of fully autonomous vehicles—or Automated Driving Systems (ADS)—is poised to scale substantially following significant technological advancements and recent regulatory approvals. However, the fundamental question of whether an ADS is safer than its human counterparts remain largely unsolved due to several challenges in establishing an appropriate real-world safety comparison method. As scaling ensues, the lack of an established method can contribute to misinterpretations or uncertainties regarding ADS safety and impede the continuous and consistent assessment of ADS performance. This study introduces three research developments to define a robust and replicable safety comparison method to address this critical methodological gap. First, we introduce the use of liability insurance claims data to measure the comparative safety between ADS and human drivers. Second, we use Swiss Re insurance claims data to establish the first zip code- and responsibility-calibrated human performance benchmark, composed of over 600,000 private passenger vehicle claims and 125 billion miles of driving exposure. Third, we perform a case study by applying the developed baseline to evaluate the safety impact of the Waymo Driver. We find that when benchmarked against zip code-calibrated human baselines, the Waymo Driver significantly improves safety towards other road users. The comparison method established in this study can be replicated for other regions or ADS deployments to aid the decision-making of ADS safety stakeholders such as regulators, and instill trust in the general public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39114012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>case studies ; decision making ; humans ; insurance ; stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2024-07, Vol.10 (14), p.e34379, Article e34379</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-20df44ff81ded6787461d665e510dfdd85b8e61490cff979fbabbe16791bb6b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8308-9941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305169/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024104100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3536,27905,27906,45761,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39114012$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Lillo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gode, Tilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atzei, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruoshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, Trent</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver</title><title>Heliyon</title><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><description>After several years of public road testing, the commercial deployment of fully autonomous vehicles—or Automated Driving Systems (ADS)—is poised to scale substantially following significant technological advancements and recent regulatory approvals. However, the fundamental question of whether an ADS is safer than its human counterparts remain largely unsolved due to several challenges in establishing an appropriate real-world safety comparison method. As scaling ensues, the lack of an established method can contribute to misinterpretations or uncertainties regarding ADS safety and impede the continuous and consistent assessment of ADS performance. This study introduces three research developments to define a robust and replicable safety comparison method to address this critical methodological gap. First, we introduce the use of liability insurance claims data to measure the comparative safety between ADS and human drivers. Second, we use Swiss Re insurance claims data to establish the first zip code- and responsibility-calibrated human performance benchmark, composed of over 600,000 private passenger vehicle claims and 125 billion miles of driving exposure. Third, we perform a case study by applying the developed baseline to evaluate the safety impact of the Waymo Driver. We find that when benchmarked against zip code-calibrated human baselines, the Waymo Driver significantly improves safety towards other road users. The comparison method established in this study can be replicated for other regions or ADS deployments to aid the decision-making of ADS safety stakeholders such as regulators, and instill trust in the general public.</description><subject>case studies</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>insurance</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv3CAUha2qVROl-QmtWHbjKZiHTTdVNH1FitRNqy4RhkuGkW2mgCfyvy-TmabJKise95wPLpyqekvwimAiPmxXGxj8EqZVgxu2AspoK19U5w3DvO4Ywy8fzc-qy5S2GGPCOyFb-ro6o5IQhklzXg3rMO501NnvASXtIC9oB9GFOOrJAAoO6TmHKYxhTjXSk0WbuZSQjcUR00d0hSLoob4LcbDI6FQwebbLwZk3gH7rZQzo8736TfXK6SHB5Wm8qH59_fJz_b2--fHten11UxvGeK4bbB1jznXEghVt1zJBrBAcOCkVazvedyAIk9g4J1vpet33QEQrSd-LvqEX1fWRa4Peql30o46LCtqr-40Qb5WO2ZsBlKO4l5T2wmjKykJr1-GOMgKEOamhsD4dWbu5H8EamHLUwxPo08rkN-o27BUhFHMiZCG8PxFi-DNDymr0ycAw6AnKoypKOO1Iyzr-vBRLLCjnkhUpP0pNDClFcA9XIlgdQqK26hQSdQiJOoak-N497ufB9S8S_xuG8kN7D1El46FkwfoIJpcn9M8c8RdxQtJ3</recordid><startdate>20240730</startdate><enddate>20240730</enddate><creator>Di Lillo, Luigi</creator><creator>Gode, Tilia</creator><creator>Zhou, Xilin</creator><creator>Atzei, Margherita</creator><creator>Chen, Ruoshu</creator><creator>Victor, Trent</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8308-9941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240730</creationdate><title>Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver</title><author>Di Lillo, Luigi ; Gode, Tilia ; Zhou, Xilin ; Atzei, Margherita ; Chen, Ruoshu ; Victor, Trent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-20df44ff81ded6787461d665e510dfdd85b8e61490cff979fbabbe16791bb6b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>case studies</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>insurance</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Lillo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gode, Tilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atzei, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruoshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, Trent</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Lillo, Luigi</au><au>Gode, Tilia</au><au>Zhou, Xilin</au><au>Atzei, Margherita</au><au>Chen, Ruoshu</au><au>Victor, Trent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><date>2024-07-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>e34379</spage><pages>e34379-</pages><artnum>e34379</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>After several years of public road testing, the commercial deployment of fully autonomous vehicles—or Automated Driving Systems (ADS)—is poised to scale substantially following significant technological advancements and recent regulatory approvals. However, the fundamental question of whether an ADS is safer than its human counterparts remain largely unsolved due to several challenges in establishing an appropriate real-world safety comparison method. As scaling ensues, the lack of an established method can contribute to misinterpretations or uncertainties regarding ADS safety and impede the continuous and consistent assessment of ADS performance. This study introduces three research developments to define a robust and replicable safety comparison method to address this critical methodological gap. First, we introduce the use of liability insurance claims data to measure the comparative safety between ADS and human drivers. Second, we use Swiss Re insurance claims data to establish the first zip code- and responsibility-calibrated human performance benchmark, composed of over 600,000 private passenger vehicle claims and 125 billion miles of driving exposure. Third, we perform a case study by applying the developed baseline to evaluate the safety impact of the Waymo Driver. We find that when benchmarked against zip code-calibrated human baselines, the Waymo Driver significantly improves safety towards other road users. The comparison method established in this study can be replicated for other regions or ADS deployments to aid the decision-making of ADS safety stakeholders such as regulators, and instill trust in the general public.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39114012</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34379</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8308-9941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-8440
ispartof Heliyon, 2024-07, Vol.10 (14), p.e34379, Article e34379
issn 2405-8440
2405-8440
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f30b933b6ca34f30aaf808341e14f9ae
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects case studies
decision making
humans
insurance
stakeholders
title Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20safety%20performance%20of%20autonomous-%20and%20human%20drivers:%20A%20real-world%20case%20study%20of%20the%20Waymo%20Driver&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Di%20Lillo,%20Luigi&rft.date=2024-07-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=e34379&rft.pages=e34379-&rft.artnum=e34379&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3090635594%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-20df44ff81ded6787461d665e510dfdd85b8e61490cff979fbabbe16791bb6b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090635594&rft_id=info:pmid/39114012&rfr_iscdi=true