Loading…

Robotic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy With Vein Resection and Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

This study aimed to compare robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vein resection (PD-VR) based on the incidence of severe postoperative complications (SPC). Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy has been gaining momentum in recent years. Vein resection is frequently required in this operation, but no study has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgery open 2024-06, Vol.5 (2), p.e409-e409
Main Authors: Napoli, Niccolò, Kauffmann, Emanuele Federico, Ginesini, Michael, Di Dato, Armando, Viti, Virginia, Gianfaldoni, Cesare, Lami, Lucrezia, Cappelli, Carla, Rotondo, Maria Isabella, Campani, Daniela, Amorese, Gabriella, Vivaldi, Caterina, Cesario, Silvia, Bernardini, Laura, Vasile, Enrico, Vistoli, Fabio, Boggi, Ugo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to compare robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vein resection (PD-VR) based on the incidence of severe postoperative complications (SPC). Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy has been gaining momentum in recent years. Vein resection is frequently required in this operation, but no study has compared robotic and open PD-VR using a matched analysis. This was an intention-to-treat study designed to demonstrate the noninferiority of robotic to open PD-VR (2011-2021) based on SPC. To achieve a power of 80% (noninferiority margin:10%; α error: 0.05; ß error: 0.20), a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis required 35 pairs. Of the 151 patients with PD-VR (open = 115, robotic = 36), 35 procedures per group were compared. Elective conversion to open surgery was required in 1 patient with robotic PD-VR (2.9%). One patient in both groups experienced partial vein thrombosis. SPC occurred in 7 (20.0%) and 6 patients (17.1%) in the robotic and open PD-VR groups, respectively ( = 0.759; OR: 1.21 [0.36-4.04]). Three patients died after robotic PD-VR (8.6%) and none died after open PD-VR ( = 0.239). Robotic PD-VR was associated with longer operative time (611.1 ± 13.9 minutes vs 529.0 ± 13.0 minutes; < 0.0001), more type 2 vein resection (28.6% vs 5.7%; = 0.0234) and less type 3 vein resection (31.4% vs 71.4%; = 0.0008), longer vein occlusion time (30 [25.3-78.3] minutes vs 15 [8-19.5] minutes; = 0.0098), less blood loss (450 [200-750] mL vs 733 [500-1070.3] mL; = 0.0075), and fewer blood transfusions (intraoperative: 14.3% vs 48.6%; = 0.0041) (perioperative: 14.3% vs 60.0%; = 0.0001). In this study, robotic PD-VR was noninferior to open PD-VR for SPC. Robotic and open PD-VR need to be compared in randomized controlled trials.
ISSN:2691-3593
2691-3593
DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000409