Loading…

Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production

Near-continuous measurements of hydroxyl radical (OH) reactivity in the urban background atmosphere of central London during the summer of 2012 are presented. OH reactivity behaviour is seen to be broadly dependent on air mass origin, with the highest reactivity and the most pronounced diurnal profi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2016-02, Vol.16 (4), p.2109-2122
Main Authors: Whalley, Lisa K, Stone, Daniel, Bandy, Brian, Dunmore, Rachel, Hamilton, Jacqueline F, Hopkins, James, Lee, James D, Lewis, Alastair C, Heard, Dwayne E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13
container_end_page 2122
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2109
container_title Atmospheric chemistry and physics
container_volume 16
creator Whalley, Lisa K
Stone, Daniel
Bandy, Brian
Dunmore, Rachel
Hamilton, Jacqueline F
Hopkins, James
Lee, James D
Lewis, Alastair C
Heard, Dwayne E
description Near-continuous measurements of hydroxyl radical (OH) reactivity in the urban background atmosphere of central London during the summer of 2012 are presented. OH reactivity behaviour is seen to be broadly dependent on air mass origin, with the highest reactivity and the most pronounced diurnal profile observed when air had passed over central London to the east, prior to measurement. Averaged over the entire observation period of 26 days, OH reactivity peaked at  ∼  27 s−1 in the morning, with a minimum of  ∼  15 s−1 during the afternoon. A maximum OH reactivity of 116 s−1 was recorded on one day during morning rush hour. A detailed box model using the Master Chemical Mechanism was used to calculate OH reactivity, and was constrained with an extended measurement data set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from a gas chromatography flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) and a two-dimensional GC instrument which included heavier molecular weight (up to C12) aliphatic VOCs, oxygenated VOCs and the biogenic VOCs α-pinene and limonene. Comparison was made between observed OH reactivity and modelled OH reactivity using (i) a standard suite of VOC measurements (C2–C8 hydrocarbons and a small selection of oxygenated VOCs) and (ii) a more comprehensive inventory including species up to C12. Modelled reactivities were lower than those measured (by 33 %) when only the reactivity of the standard VOC suite was considered. The difference between measured and modelled reactivity was improved, to within 15 %, if the reactivity of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) was also considered, with the reactivity of the biogenic compounds of α-pinene and limonene and their oxidation products almost entirely responsible for this improvement. Further improvements in the model's ability to reproduce OH reactivity (to within 6 %) could be achieved if the reactivity and degradation mechanism of unassigned two-dimensional GC peaks were estimated. Neglecting the contribution of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) (particularly α-pinene and limonene) and model-generated intermediates increases the modelled OH concentrations by 41 %, and the magnitude of in situ ozone production calculated from the production of RO2 was significantly lower (60 %). This work highlights that any future ozone abatement strategies should consider the role that biogenic emissions play alongside anthropogenic emissions in influencing London's air quality.
doi_str_mv 10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f35cca91dcdb4018a3a9b43d7dae6224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A481401299</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f35cca91dcdb4018a3a9b43d7dae6224</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A481401299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1rGzEQxZfSQtO09x4FPRW6qaTd1Uq9mdAmBkOgH2cxK41cGe_KlWST9K-v1g4lhlJ0kHj85mlmeFX1ltGrjqn2I5hdzUTNGVU1p0w8qy6YkLTuG94-f_J-Wb1KaUMp7yhrL6rDIo8h7X5i9Ibc3ZKIYLI_-PxA_EQMTjnClqzCZMP0iYQhYTxA9mFKH8gYLG7JLqL15igRmCzBlP0IGRMJbvZIPu9J-B0mLGiw-yP6unrhYJvwzeN9Wf348vn79W29urtZXi9Wten6NtcOO-i5RQqOCuZkQxshjOpED5I5w7hROCh0IAcqhXVWdcillU65XoiBNZfV8uRrA2z0LpbO4oMO4PVRCHGtIWZvtqhd0xkDilljh5YyCQ2ooW1sbwEF523xenfyKmP82pcx9Sbs41Ta17xlLZ976_9HMSWV7IRkT7zWUL72kwtlz2b0yehFWwDKuFKFuvoHVY7F0ZuyUeeLflbw_qygMBnv8xr2Kenlt6_nLD2xJoaUIrq_62FUz5HSJVKaCT1HSs-Rav4AX52-QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989856814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Whalley, Lisa K ; Stone, Daniel ; Bandy, Brian ; Dunmore, Rachel ; Hamilton, Jacqueline F ; Hopkins, James ; Lee, James D ; Lewis, Alastair C ; Heard, Dwayne E</creator><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Lisa K ; Stone, Daniel ; Bandy, Brian ; Dunmore, Rachel ; Hamilton, Jacqueline F ; Hopkins, James ; Lee, James D ; Lewis, Alastair C ; Heard, Dwayne E</creatorcontrib><description>Near-continuous measurements of hydroxyl radical (OH) reactivity in the urban background atmosphere of central London during the summer of 2012 are presented. OH reactivity behaviour is seen to be broadly dependent on air mass origin, with the highest reactivity and the most pronounced diurnal profile observed when air had passed over central London to the east, prior to measurement. Averaged over the entire observation period of 26 days, OH reactivity peaked at  ∼  27 s−1 in the morning, with a minimum of  ∼  15 s−1 during the afternoon. A maximum OH reactivity of 116 s−1 was recorded on one day during morning rush hour. A detailed box model using the Master Chemical Mechanism was used to calculate OH reactivity, and was constrained with an extended measurement data set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from a gas chromatography flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) and a two-dimensional GC instrument which included heavier molecular weight (up to C12) aliphatic VOCs, oxygenated VOCs and the biogenic VOCs α-pinene and limonene. Comparison was made between observed OH reactivity and modelled OH reactivity using (i) a standard suite of VOC measurements (C2–C8 hydrocarbons and a small selection of oxygenated VOCs) and (ii) a more comprehensive inventory including species up to C12. Modelled reactivities were lower than those measured (by 33 %) when only the reactivity of the standard VOC suite was considered. The difference between measured and modelled reactivity was improved, to within 15 %, if the reactivity of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) was also considered, with the reactivity of the biogenic compounds of α-pinene and limonene and their oxidation products almost entirely responsible for this improvement. Further improvements in the model's ability to reproduce OH reactivity (to within 6 %) could be achieved if the reactivity and degradation mechanism of unassigned two-dimensional GC peaks were estimated. Neglecting the contribution of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) (particularly α-pinene and limonene) and model-generated intermediates increases the modelled OH concentrations by 41 %, and the magnitude of in situ ozone production calculated from the production of RO2 was significantly lower (60 %). This work highlights that any future ozone abatement strategies should consider the role that biogenic emissions play alongside anthropogenic emissions in influencing London's air quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Air masses ; Air pollution ; Air quality ; Aliphatic compounds ; Analysis ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biogenic emissions ; Cities ; Diurnal ; Emission measurements ; Environmental aspects ; Flame ionization detectors ; Gas chromatography ; Hydrocarbons ; Hydroxyl radicals ; Intermediates ; Limonene ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Molecular weight ; Morning ; Organic compounds ; Oxidation ; Oxygenation ; Ozone ; Ozone production ; Pollution abatement ; Reactivity ; Urban studies ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; α-Pinene</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2016-02, Vol.16 (4), p.2109-2122</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2016</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9114-1823 ; 0000-0002-0447-2633 ; 0000-0002-0357-6238 ; 0000-0001-5397-2872 ; 0000-0001-5610-0463</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1989856814/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1989856814?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Lisa K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunmore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Jacqueline F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Alastair C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, Dwayne E</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production</title><title>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</title><description>Near-continuous measurements of hydroxyl radical (OH) reactivity in the urban background atmosphere of central London during the summer of 2012 are presented. OH reactivity behaviour is seen to be broadly dependent on air mass origin, with the highest reactivity and the most pronounced diurnal profile observed when air had passed over central London to the east, prior to measurement. Averaged over the entire observation period of 26 days, OH reactivity peaked at  ∼  27 s−1 in the morning, with a minimum of  ∼  15 s−1 during the afternoon. A maximum OH reactivity of 116 s−1 was recorded on one day during morning rush hour. A detailed box model using the Master Chemical Mechanism was used to calculate OH reactivity, and was constrained with an extended measurement data set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from a gas chromatography flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) and a two-dimensional GC instrument which included heavier molecular weight (up to C12) aliphatic VOCs, oxygenated VOCs and the biogenic VOCs α-pinene and limonene. Comparison was made between observed OH reactivity and modelled OH reactivity using (i) a standard suite of VOC measurements (C2–C8 hydrocarbons and a small selection of oxygenated VOCs) and (ii) a more comprehensive inventory including species up to C12. Modelled reactivities were lower than those measured (by 33 %) when only the reactivity of the standard VOC suite was considered. The difference between measured and modelled reactivity was improved, to within 15 %, if the reactivity of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) was also considered, with the reactivity of the biogenic compounds of α-pinene and limonene and their oxidation products almost entirely responsible for this improvement. Further improvements in the model's ability to reproduce OH reactivity (to within 6 %) could be achieved if the reactivity and degradation mechanism of unassigned two-dimensional GC peaks were estimated. Neglecting the contribution of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) (particularly α-pinene and limonene) and model-generated intermediates increases the modelled OH concentrations by 41 %, and the magnitude of in situ ozone production calculated from the production of RO2 was significantly lower (60 %). This work highlights that any future ozone abatement strategies should consider the role that biogenic emissions play alongside anthropogenic emissions in influencing London's air quality.</description><subject>Air masses</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Aliphatic compounds</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biogenic emissions</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Flame ionization detectors</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Hydroxyl radicals</subject><subject>Intermediates</subject><subject>Limonene</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Morning</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone production</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>Reactivity</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>α-Pinene</subject><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><issn>1680-7324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1rGzEQxZfSQtO09x4FPRW6qaTd1Uq9mdAmBkOgH2cxK41cGe_KlWST9K-v1g4lhlJ0kHj85mlmeFX1ltGrjqn2I5hdzUTNGVU1p0w8qy6YkLTuG94-f_J-Wb1KaUMp7yhrL6rDIo8h7X5i9Ibc3ZKIYLI_-PxA_EQMTjnClqzCZMP0iYQhYTxA9mFKH8gYLG7JLqL15igRmCzBlP0IGRMJbvZIPu9J-B0mLGiw-yP6unrhYJvwzeN9Wf348vn79W29urtZXi9Wten6NtcOO-i5RQqOCuZkQxshjOpED5I5w7hROCh0IAcqhXVWdcillU65XoiBNZfV8uRrA2z0LpbO4oMO4PVRCHGtIWZvtqhd0xkDilljh5YyCQ2ooW1sbwEF523xenfyKmP82pcx9Sbs41Ta17xlLZ976_9HMSWV7IRkT7zWUL72kwtlz2b0yehFWwDKuFKFuvoHVY7F0ZuyUeeLflbw_qygMBnv8xr2Kenlt6_nLD2xJoaUIrq_62FUz5HSJVKaCT1HSs-Rav4AX52-QA</recordid><startdate>20160224</startdate><enddate>20160224</enddate><creator>Whalley, Lisa K</creator><creator>Stone, Daniel</creator><creator>Bandy, Brian</creator><creator>Dunmore, Rachel</creator><creator>Hamilton, Jacqueline F</creator><creator>Hopkins, James</creator><creator>Lee, James D</creator><creator>Lewis, Alastair C</creator><creator>Heard, Dwayne E</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-1823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0357-6238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-0463</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160224</creationdate><title>Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production</title><author>Whalley, Lisa K ; Stone, Daniel ; Bandy, Brian ; Dunmore, Rachel ; Hamilton, Jacqueline F ; Hopkins, James ; Lee, James D ; Lewis, Alastair C ; Heard, Dwayne E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air masses</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Aliphatic compounds</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biogenic emissions</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Flame ionization detectors</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Hydroxyl radicals</topic><topic>Intermediates</topic><topic>Limonene</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Morning</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone production</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>Reactivity</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>α-Pinene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Lisa K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunmore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Jacqueline F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Alastair C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, Dwayne E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whalley, Lisa K</au><au>Stone, Daniel</au><au>Bandy, Brian</au><au>Dunmore, Rachel</au><au>Hamilton, Jacqueline F</au><au>Hopkins, James</au><au>Lee, James D</au><au>Lewis, Alastair C</au><au>Heard, Dwayne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle><date>2016-02-24</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2109</spage><epage>2122</epage><pages>2109-2122</pages><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><eissn>1680-7324</eissn><abstract>Near-continuous measurements of hydroxyl radical (OH) reactivity in the urban background atmosphere of central London during the summer of 2012 are presented. OH reactivity behaviour is seen to be broadly dependent on air mass origin, with the highest reactivity and the most pronounced diurnal profile observed when air had passed over central London to the east, prior to measurement. Averaged over the entire observation period of 26 days, OH reactivity peaked at  ∼  27 s−1 in the morning, with a minimum of  ∼  15 s−1 during the afternoon. A maximum OH reactivity of 116 s−1 was recorded on one day during morning rush hour. A detailed box model using the Master Chemical Mechanism was used to calculate OH reactivity, and was constrained with an extended measurement data set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from a gas chromatography flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) and a two-dimensional GC instrument which included heavier molecular weight (up to C12) aliphatic VOCs, oxygenated VOCs and the biogenic VOCs α-pinene and limonene. Comparison was made between observed OH reactivity and modelled OH reactivity using (i) a standard suite of VOC measurements (C2–C8 hydrocarbons and a small selection of oxygenated VOCs) and (ii) a more comprehensive inventory including species up to C12. Modelled reactivities were lower than those measured (by 33 %) when only the reactivity of the standard VOC suite was considered. The difference between measured and modelled reactivity was improved, to within 15 %, if the reactivity of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) was also considered, with the reactivity of the biogenic compounds of α-pinene and limonene and their oxidation products almost entirely responsible for this improvement. Further improvements in the model's ability to reproduce OH reactivity (to within 6 %) could be achieved if the reactivity and degradation mechanism of unassigned two-dimensional GC peaks were estimated. Neglecting the contribution of the higher VOCs (⩾ C9) (particularly α-pinene and limonene) and model-generated intermediates increases the modelled OH concentrations by 41 %, and the magnitude of in situ ozone production calculated from the production of RO2 was significantly lower (60 %). This work highlights that any future ozone abatement strategies should consider the role that biogenic emissions play alongside anthropogenic emissions in influencing London's air quality.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-1823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0357-6238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-0463</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1680-7324
ispartof Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2016-02, Vol.16 (4), p.2109-2122
issn 1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f35cca91dcdb4018a3a9b43d7dae6224
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Air masses
Air pollution
Air quality
Aliphatic compounds
Analysis
Anthropogenic factors
Biogenic emissions
Cities
Diurnal
Emission measurements
Environmental aspects
Flame ionization detectors
Gas chromatography
Hydrocarbons
Hydroxyl radicals
Intermediates
Limonene
Mathematical models
Measurement
Molecular weight
Morning
Organic compounds
Oxidation
Oxygenation
Ozone
Ozone production
Pollution abatement
Reactivity
Urban studies
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
α-Pinene
title Atmospheric OH reactivity in central London: observations, model predictions and estimates of in situ ozone production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20OH%20reactivity%20in%20central%20London:%20observations,%20model%20predictions%20and%20estimates%20of%20in%20situ%20ozone%20production&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20chemistry%20and%20physics&rft.au=Whalley,%20Lisa%20K&rft.date=2016-02-24&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2109&rft.epage=2122&rft.pages=2109-2122&rft.issn=1680-7324&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/acp-16-2109-2016&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA481401299%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-fe5a72de0af061f830366c9567a81fc12c9eb9efa8b086dfd95e28d8f9f766b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989856814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A481401299&rfr_iscdi=true