Loading…

Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study

Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online) Analgesia and Critical Care (Online), 2024-10, Vol.4 (1), p.69-9, Article 69
Main Authors: Camporesi, Anna, Roveri, Giulia, Vetrugno, Luigi, Buonsenso, Danilo, De Giorgis, Valentina, Costanzo, Sara, Pierucci, Ugo Maria, Pelizzo, Gloria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-789be896e0ab8299418c54f2532e78c2eb201e8d3cf973a63d4beb5ac56ca7ba3
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)
container_volume 4
creator Camporesi, Anna
Roveri, Giulia
Vetrugno, Luigi
Buonsenso, Danilo
De Giorgis, Valentina
Costanzo, Sara
Pierucci, Ugo Maria
Pelizzo, Gloria
description Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rates of respiratory complications, including atelectasis, compared to intravenous induction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of inhalation versus intravenous anesthesia induction on atelectasis formation in pediatric patients, as assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS). This propensity score-matched observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Milan, Italy. Inclusion criteria were children ≤ 18 years undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. Patients were divided into inhalation and intravenous induction groups. LUS was performed before and after anesthesia induction to assess lung aeration. The primary endpoint was the global LUS score post-induction, with secondary endpoints including the incidence and distribution of atelectasis. Of the 326 patients included, 65% underwent inhalation induction and 35% intravenous induction. The global LUS score was significantly higher in the inhalation group (12.0 vs. 4.0, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s44158-024-00206-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3605136cff34fecac39c3895ad417b9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f3605136cff34fecac39c3895ad417b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3113380741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-789be896e0ab8299418c54f2532e78c2eb201e8d3cf973a63d4beb5ac56ca7ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdksFu1DAQhiMEolXpC3BAlrhwICWOncTmglAFtNJKXOBsTZzxrlfZOHic0n0fHhRvt1QtJ1v2N59mRn9RvObVBeeq_UBS8kaVVS3Lqqqrtrx9VpzWneCl6FT7_NH9pDgn2laZUk0nNH9ZnAgtWl1LfVr8WS3Tmi1jikBhmQYGREi0wymx4BgkHNEmIE_MhXEMv33GB-8cxgMCE1LaIHlgfhoWm3yYWEK7mfyvBSk_shkHDyl6y2ZIPhfRRwZsjmHGiXzaM7IhYrmDZDc4vGehJ4w3cDDByCgtw_5V8cLBSHh-f54VP79--XF5Va6-f7u-_LwqrZQqlZ3SPSrdYgW9qrWWXNlGuroRNXbK1tjXFUc1COt0J6AVg-yxb8A2rYWuB3FWXB-9Q4CtmaPfQdybAN7cPYS4NhCTtyMaJ9qq4aK1zgnp0IIV2gqlGxgk73qdXZ-OrnnpdzjYPHiE8Yn06c_kN2Ydbgznsqlzf9nw7t4Qw2GZyew8WRzHvPSwkBGcC6GqTvKMvv0P3YYl5v0dKa462TSZqo-UjYEoonvohlfmECpzDJXJoTJ3oTK3uejN4zkeSv5FSPwF_1TOIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3113187455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Camporesi, Anna ; Roveri, Giulia ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Buonsenso, Danilo ; De Giorgis, Valentina ; Costanzo, Sara ; Pierucci, Ugo Maria ; Pelizzo, Gloria</creator><creatorcontrib>Camporesi, Anna ; Roveri, Giulia ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Buonsenso, Danilo ; De Giorgis, Valentina ; Costanzo, Sara ; Pierucci, Ugo Maria ; Pelizzo, Gloria</creatorcontrib><description>Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rates of respiratory complications, including atelectasis, compared to intravenous induction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of inhalation versus intravenous anesthesia induction on atelectasis formation in pediatric patients, as assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS). This propensity score-matched observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Milan, Italy. Inclusion criteria were children ≤ 18 years undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. Patients were divided into inhalation and intravenous induction groups. LUS was performed before and after anesthesia induction to assess lung aeration. The primary endpoint was the global LUS score post-induction, with secondary endpoints including the incidence and distribution of atelectasis. Of the 326 patients included, 65% underwent inhalation induction and 35% intravenous induction. The global LUS score was significantly higher in the inhalation group (12.0 vs. 4.0, p &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching (for age, presence of upper respiratory tract infection, duration of induction, and PEEP levels at induction), average treatment effect (ATE) of mask induction was 5.89 (95% CI, 3.21-8.58; p &lt; 0.001) point on LUS global score and a coefficient of 0.35 (OR 1.41) for atelectasis. Inhalation induction is associated with a higher incidence of atelectasis in pediatric patients also when we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06069414.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2731-3786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2731-3786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00206-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39369249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Atelectasis ; Fentanyl ; General anesthesia ; Inhalatory induction ; Intravenous induction ; Intubation ; Lung ultrasound ; Medical personnel ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Pediatric anesthesia ; Pediatrics ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online), 2024-10, Vol.4 (1), p.69-9, Article 69</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-789be896e0ab8299418c54f2532e78c2eb201e8d3cf973a63d4beb5ac56ca7ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1160-1456</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3113187455/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3113187455?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25728,27898,27899,36986,36987,44563,53763,53765,75093</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39369249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camporesi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roveri, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetrugno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonsenso, Danilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Giorgis, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierucci, Ugo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelizzo, Gloria</creatorcontrib><title>Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study</title><title>Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)</title><addtitle>J Anesth Analg Crit Care</addtitle><description>Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rates of respiratory complications, including atelectasis, compared to intravenous induction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of inhalation versus intravenous anesthesia induction on atelectasis formation in pediatric patients, as assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS). This propensity score-matched observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Milan, Italy. Inclusion criteria were children ≤ 18 years undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. Patients were divided into inhalation and intravenous induction groups. LUS was performed before and after anesthesia induction to assess lung aeration. The primary endpoint was the global LUS score post-induction, with secondary endpoints including the incidence and distribution of atelectasis. Of the 326 patients included, 65% underwent inhalation induction and 35% intravenous induction. The global LUS score was significantly higher in the inhalation group (12.0 vs. 4.0, p &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching (for age, presence of upper respiratory tract infection, duration of induction, and PEEP levels at induction), average treatment effect (ATE) of mask induction was 5.89 (95% CI, 3.21-8.58; p &lt; 0.001) point on LUS global score and a coefficient of 0.35 (OR 1.41) for atelectasis. Inhalation induction is associated with a higher incidence of atelectasis in pediatric patients also when we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06069414.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Atelectasis</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Inhalatory induction</subject><subject>Intravenous induction</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Lung ultrasound</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatric anesthesia</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2731-3786</issn><issn>2731-3786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdksFu1DAQhiMEolXpC3BAlrhwICWOncTmglAFtNJKXOBsTZzxrlfZOHic0n0fHhRvt1QtJ1v2N59mRn9RvObVBeeq_UBS8kaVVS3Lqqqrtrx9VpzWneCl6FT7_NH9pDgn2laZUk0nNH9ZnAgtWl1LfVr8WS3Tmi1jikBhmQYGREi0wymx4BgkHNEmIE_MhXEMv33GB-8cxgMCE1LaIHlgfhoWm3yYWEK7mfyvBSk_shkHDyl6y2ZIPhfRRwZsjmHGiXzaM7IhYrmDZDc4vGehJ4w3cDDByCgtw_5V8cLBSHh-f54VP79--XF5Va6-f7u-_LwqrZQqlZ3SPSrdYgW9qrWWXNlGuroRNXbK1tjXFUc1COt0J6AVg-yxb8A2rYWuB3FWXB-9Q4CtmaPfQdybAN7cPYS4NhCTtyMaJ9qq4aK1zgnp0IIV2gqlGxgk73qdXZ-OrnnpdzjYPHiE8Yn06c_kN2Ydbgznsqlzf9nw7t4Qw2GZyew8WRzHvPSwkBGcC6GqTvKMvv0P3YYl5v0dKa462TSZqo-UjYEoonvohlfmECpzDJXJoTJ3oTK3uejN4zkeSv5FSPwF_1TOIQ</recordid><startdate>20241005</startdate><enddate>20241005</enddate><creator>Camporesi, Anna</creator><creator>Roveri, Giulia</creator><creator>Vetrugno, Luigi</creator><creator>Buonsenso, Danilo</creator><creator>De Giorgis, Valentina</creator><creator>Costanzo, Sara</creator><creator>Pierucci, Ugo Maria</creator><creator>Pelizzo, Gloria</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-1456</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241005</creationdate><title>Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study</title><author>Camporesi, Anna ; Roveri, Giulia ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Buonsenso, Danilo ; De Giorgis, Valentina ; Costanzo, Sara ; Pierucci, Ugo Maria ; Pelizzo, Gloria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-789be896e0ab8299418c54f2532e78c2eb201e8d3cf973a63d4beb5ac56ca7ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Atelectasis</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Inhalatory induction</topic><topic>Intravenous induction</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Lung ultrasound</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatric anesthesia</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camporesi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roveri, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetrugno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonsenso, Danilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Giorgis, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierucci, Ugo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelizzo, Gloria</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camporesi, Anna</au><au>Roveri, Giulia</au><au>Vetrugno, Luigi</au><au>Buonsenso, Danilo</au><au>De Giorgis, Valentina</au><au>Costanzo, Sara</au><au>Pierucci, Ugo Maria</au><au>Pelizzo, Gloria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>J Anesth Analg Crit Care</addtitle><date>2024-10-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>69-9</pages><artnum>69</artnum><issn>2731-3786</issn><eissn>2731-3786</eissn><abstract>Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rates of respiratory complications, including atelectasis, compared to intravenous induction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of inhalation versus intravenous anesthesia induction on atelectasis formation in pediatric patients, as assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS). This propensity score-matched observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Milan, Italy. Inclusion criteria were children ≤ 18 years undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. Patients were divided into inhalation and intravenous induction groups. LUS was performed before and after anesthesia induction to assess lung aeration. The primary endpoint was the global LUS score post-induction, with secondary endpoints including the incidence and distribution of atelectasis. Of the 326 patients included, 65% underwent inhalation induction and 35% intravenous induction. The global LUS score was significantly higher in the inhalation group (12.0 vs. 4.0, p &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching (for age, presence of upper respiratory tract infection, duration of induction, and PEEP levels at induction), average treatment effect (ATE) of mask induction was 5.89 (95% CI, 3.21-8.58; p &lt; 0.001) point on LUS global score and a coefficient of 0.35 (OR 1.41) for atelectasis. Inhalation induction is associated with a higher incidence of atelectasis in pediatric patients also when we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06069414.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>39369249</pmid><doi>10.1186/s44158-024-00206-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-1456</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2731-3786
ispartof Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online), 2024-10, Vol.4 (1), p.69-9, Article 69
issn 2731-3786
2731-3786
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3605136cff34fecac39c3895ad417b9
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Airway management
Atelectasis
Fentanyl
General anesthesia
Inhalatory induction
Intravenous induction
Intubation
Lung ultrasound
Medical personnel
Observational studies
Patients
Pediatric anesthesia
Pediatrics
Surgery
Ultrasonic imaging
title Lung ultrasound assessment of atelectasis following different anesthesia induction techniques in pediatric patients: a propensity score-matched, observational study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T04%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lung%20ultrasound%20assessment%20of%20atelectasis%20following%20different%20anesthesia%20induction%20techniques%20in%20pediatric%20patients:%20a%20propensity%20score-matched,%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Anesthesia,%20Analgesia%20and%20Critical%20Care%20(Online)&rft.au=Camporesi,%20Anna&rft.date=2024-10-05&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=69-9&rft.artnum=69&rft.issn=2731-3786&rft.eissn=2731-3786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s44158-024-00206-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3113380741%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-789be896e0ab8299418c54f2532e78c2eb201e8d3cf973a63d4beb5ac56ca7ba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3113187455&rft_id=info:pmid/39369249&rfr_iscdi=true