Loading…

Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study

Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery endoscopic, and robotic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.5 (3), p.100-105
Main Authors: Lee, Kit-Fai, Fung, Andrew KY, Lok, Hon-Ting, Kung, Janet WC, Lo, Eugene YJ, Chong, Charing CN, Wong, John, Ng, Kelvin KC
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-89f304255d10229b979a8c94b84f02143ecdbf21e902c86a64e29c703cb269bc3
container_end_page 105
container_issue 3
container_start_page 100
container_title Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery
container_volume 5
creator Lee, Kit-Fai
Fung, Andrew KY
Lok, Hon-Ting
Kung, Janet WC
Lo, Eugene YJ
Chong, Charing CN
Wong, John
Ng, Kelvin KC
description Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy. All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups. There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, p > 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery. Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3bdae82b5ad43659493a90ee2273eff</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2468900922000275</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f3bdae82b5ad43659493a90ee2273eff</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2468900922000275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-89f304255d10229b979a8c94b84f02143ecdbf21e902c86a64e29c703cb269bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qHDEQhIeQQIztF8hJL7CTljR_MrkYE8cGQy7OWbSk1kbD7GqQ5IV9-2i9xviUUxcNVVR9TfONQ8uBD9_ndqGUWwFCtNC3APxTcyG6YdooAPX5g_7aXOc8A4DgHYySXzTzPWEOJiyhHFn0bIvLYhZ0jhJbE2VKBywh7pl7SWG_ZSmaWIJlC_nC_tKKhWyJu-MNu2WJSop5rY9wIGbjbsWErzqXF3e8ar54XDJdv93L5s_9z-e7h83T71-Pd7dPGyv5WDaT8hI60feO10HKqFHhZFVnps6fekuyznjBSYGw04BDR0LZEaQ1YlDGysvm8ZzrIs56TWGH6agjBv36iGmrMdUNC2kvjUOahOnRdXLoVackKiASYpTkfc0S5yxbl-VE_j2Pgz7B17M-wdcn-Bp6XeFX04-zierKQ6Cksw20t-RCqnBqjfA_-z_ayI-z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Fung, Andrew KY ; Lok, Hon-Ting ; Kung, Janet WC ; Lo, Eugene YJ ; Chong, Charing CN ; Wong, John ; Ng, Kelvin KC</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Fung, Andrew KY ; Lok, Hon-Ting ; Kung, Janet WC ; Lo, Eugene YJ ; Chong, Charing CN ; Wong, John ; Ng, Kelvin KC</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy. All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups. There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, p &gt; 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery. Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-9009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cholecystectomy ; Gallbladder preservation ; Robotic left hepatectomy</subject><ispartof>Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.5 (3), p.100-105</ispartof><rights>2022 Zhejiang University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-89f304255d10229b979a8c94b84f02143ecdbf21e902c86a64e29c703cb269bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4647-0254 ; 0000-0003-2324-0288 ; 0000-0003-0637-0291 ; 0000-0002-3679-6368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Andrew KY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Hon-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Janet WC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Eugene YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Charing CN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kelvin KC</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study</title><title>Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery</title><description>Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy. All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups. There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, p &gt; 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery. Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.</description><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Gallbladder preservation</subject><subject>Robotic left hepatectomy</subject><issn>2468-9009</issn><issn>2468-9009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1qHDEQhIeQQIztF8hJL7CTljR_MrkYE8cGQy7OWbSk1kbD7GqQ5IV9-2i9xviUUxcNVVR9TfONQ8uBD9_ndqGUWwFCtNC3APxTcyG6YdooAPX5g_7aXOc8A4DgHYySXzTzPWEOJiyhHFn0bIvLYhZ0jhJbE2VKBywh7pl7SWG_ZSmaWIJlC_nC_tKKhWyJu-MNu2WJSop5rY9wIGbjbsWErzqXF3e8ar54XDJdv93L5s_9z-e7h83T71-Pd7dPGyv5WDaT8hI60feO10HKqFHhZFVnps6fekuyznjBSYGw04BDR0LZEaQ1YlDGysvm8ZzrIs56TWGH6agjBv36iGmrMdUNC2kvjUOahOnRdXLoVackKiASYpTkfc0S5yxbl-VE_j2Pgz7B17M-wdcn-Bp6XeFX04-zierKQ6Cksw20t-RCqnBqjfA_-z_ayI-z</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Lee, Kit-Fai</creator><creator>Fung, Andrew KY</creator><creator>Lok, Hon-Ting</creator><creator>Kung, Janet WC</creator><creator>Lo, Eugene YJ</creator><creator>Chong, Charing CN</creator><creator>Wong, John</creator><creator>Ng, Kelvin KC</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>KeAi Communications Co., Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-0254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0288</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0637-0291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3679-6368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study</title><author>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Fung, Andrew KY ; Lok, Hon-Ting ; Kung, Janet WC ; Lo, Eugene YJ ; Chong, Charing CN ; Wong, John ; Ng, Kelvin KC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-89f304255d10229b979a8c94b84f02143ecdbf21e902c86a64e29c703cb269bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Gallbladder preservation</topic><topic>Robotic left hepatectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Andrew KY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Hon-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Janet WC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Eugene YJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Charing CN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kelvin KC</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Kit-Fai</au><au>Fung, Andrew KY</au><au>Lok, Hon-Ting</au><au>Kung, Janet WC</au><au>Lo, Eugene YJ</au><au>Chong, Charing CN</au><au>Wong, John</au><au>Ng, Kelvin KC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>100-105</pages><issn>2468-9009</issn><eissn>2468-9009</eissn><abstract>Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy. All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups. There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, p &gt; 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery. Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-0254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0288</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0637-0291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3679-6368</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2468-9009
ispartof Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.5 (3), p.100-105
issn 2468-9009
2468-9009
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3bdae82b5ad43659493a90ee2273eff
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cholecystectomy
Gallbladder preservation
Robotic left hepatectomy
title Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A56%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20gallbladder%20preservation%20during%20robotic%20left%20hepatectomy:%20A%20retrospective%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Laparoscopic,%20endoscopic,%20and%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Lee,%20Kit-Fai&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=100-105&rft.issn=2468-9009&rft.eissn=2468-9009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2468900922000275%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-89f304255d10229b979a8c94b84f02143ecdbf21e902c86a64e29c703cb269bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true