Loading…

Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix

[Display omitted] •Functional and taxonomic composition of bird assemblages inside cities vary with the surrounding habitat.•A landscape matrix mainly composed of native habitat may mitigate the urban impact on native communities.•Species and traits turnover was more evident in the agricultural than...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives in ecology and conservation 2022-01, Vol.20 (1), p.9-17
Main Authors: Vaccaro, Anahí S., Filloy, Julieta, Bellocq, M. Isabel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Perspectives in ecology and conservation
container_volume 20
creator Vaccaro, Anahí S.
Filloy, Julieta
Bellocq, M. Isabel
description [Display omitted] •Functional and taxonomic composition of bird assemblages inside cities vary with the surrounding habitat.•A landscape matrix mainly composed of native habitat may mitigate the urban impact on native communities.•Species and traits turnover was more evident in the agricultural than in the forest landscape matrix.•Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component and sure successful bird breed. Urbanization represents one of the most striking threats to biodiversity due to habitat loss and fragmentation, particularly in forest biomes. The role of the surrounding matrix in maintaining native diversity in urban areas remains poorly studied. We compared taxonomic and functional bird diversity and dissimilarity between urban settlements (USs) and natural habitats (NHs) in the forest landscape matrix (FM) and agriculture landscape matrix (AM) of the Atlantic Forest of South America, and explored the relationships of species traits between USs and NHs. Birds were surveyed in five USs and five NHs in the FM, and four USs and three NHs in the AM using point counts. We used generalized least squares models to test for differences in diversities and dissimilarities between sites from the two landscapes, and the similarity percentage and fourth-corner analysis to determine the bird species and traits that contributed most to the differences between habitat types. Taxonomic and functional diversities were higher and dissimilarities were lower for US in the FM than for those in the AM. Species with urban and generalist traits occurred in all USs, but assemblages also included forest species in the FM. Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component, provided that it is necessary for forest bird species to breed successfully.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pecon.2021.10.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3e453a4603b47378564da48ec44dd2a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2530064421000882</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f3e453a4603b47378564da48ec44dd2a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2530064421000882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRRtRUNQvcJMfmDGvzrQLFyo-BgQ3ug7VSUUzdCdjEkf9e9OOiCtXVdzinqriNs0Jo3NGmTpdzddoYphzyllV5pSyneaAt4LOqJJy90-_3xznvKKU8o5RumAHzeulT5YU-Ighjt4QCJa4t2CKjwEGYv0GU_blk_hA3lIPgWQsZcARQ8nk3ZeXOgDiYsJcSO_jiGQD6fN7RMoLkqEis4E1khFK8h9HzZ6DIePxTz1snm6uH6_uZvcPt8uri_uZkUyWmVQ9yBataJVlHJUwDLjrGDphjZKmOxOmXaDtHVdW9q5r0VnBOBNniisD4rBZbrk2wkqvkx_rWTqC199CTM8aUvFmQO0EylaAVFT0ciEWXaukBdmhkdJaPrHElmVSzDmh--UxqqcQdN0whaCnECaxhlBd51sX1jc3HpPOxmMwaH1CU-od_l__F_KOkyk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vaccaro, Anahí S. ; Filloy, Julieta ; Bellocq, M. Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaccaro, Anahí S. ; Filloy, Julieta ; Bellocq, M. Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Functional and taxonomic composition of bird assemblages inside cities vary with the surrounding habitat.•A landscape matrix mainly composed of native habitat may mitigate the urban impact on native communities.•Species and traits turnover was more evident in the agricultural than in the forest landscape matrix.•Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component and sure successful bird breed. Urbanization represents one of the most striking threats to biodiversity due to habitat loss and fragmentation, particularly in forest biomes. The role of the surrounding matrix in maintaining native diversity in urban areas remains poorly studied. We compared taxonomic and functional bird diversity and dissimilarity between urban settlements (USs) and natural habitats (NHs) in the forest landscape matrix (FM) and agriculture landscape matrix (AM) of the Atlantic Forest of South America, and explored the relationships of species traits between USs and NHs. Birds were surveyed in five USs and five NHs in the FM, and four USs and three NHs in the AM using point counts. We used generalized least squares models to test for differences in diversities and dissimilarities between sites from the two landscapes, and the similarity percentage and fourth-corner analysis to determine the bird species and traits that contributed most to the differences between habitat types. Taxonomic and functional diversities were higher and dissimilarities were lower for US in the FM than for those in the AM. Species with urban and generalist traits occurred in all USs, but assemblages also included forest species in the FM. Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component, provided that it is necessary for forest bird species to breed successfully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2530-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2530-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2021.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural matrix ; Atlantic Forest ; Forest matrix ; Landscape fragmentation ; Native habitat</subject><ispartof>Perspectives in ecology and conservation, 2022-01, Vol.20 (1), p.9-17</ispartof><rights>2021 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Ecológica e Conservação</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5038-1716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064421000882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaccaro, Anahí S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filloy, Julieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellocq, M. Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix</title><title>Perspectives in ecology and conservation</title><description>[Display omitted] •Functional and taxonomic composition of bird assemblages inside cities vary with the surrounding habitat.•A landscape matrix mainly composed of native habitat may mitigate the urban impact on native communities.•Species and traits turnover was more evident in the agricultural than in the forest landscape matrix.•Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component and sure successful bird breed. Urbanization represents one of the most striking threats to biodiversity due to habitat loss and fragmentation, particularly in forest biomes. The role of the surrounding matrix in maintaining native diversity in urban areas remains poorly studied. We compared taxonomic and functional bird diversity and dissimilarity between urban settlements (USs) and natural habitats (NHs) in the forest landscape matrix (FM) and agriculture landscape matrix (AM) of the Atlantic Forest of South America, and explored the relationships of species traits between USs and NHs. Birds were surveyed in five USs and five NHs in the FM, and four USs and three NHs in the AM using point counts. We used generalized least squares models to test for differences in diversities and dissimilarities between sites from the two landscapes, and the similarity percentage and fourth-corner analysis to determine the bird species and traits that contributed most to the differences between habitat types. Taxonomic and functional diversities were higher and dissimilarities were lower for US in the FM than for those in the AM. Species with urban and generalist traits occurred in all USs, but assemblages also included forest species in the FM. Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component, provided that it is necessary for forest bird species to breed successfully.</description><subject>Agricultural matrix</subject><subject>Atlantic Forest</subject><subject>Forest matrix</subject><subject>Landscape fragmentation</subject><subject>Native habitat</subject><issn>2530-0644</issn><issn>2530-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRRtRUNQvcJMfmDGvzrQLFyo-BgQ3ug7VSUUzdCdjEkf9e9OOiCtXVdzinqriNs0Jo3NGmTpdzddoYphzyllV5pSyneaAt4LOqJJy90-_3xznvKKU8o5RumAHzeulT5YU-Ighjt4QCJa4t2CKjwEGYv0GU_blk_hA3lIPgWQsZcARQ8nk3ZeXOgDiYsJcSO_jiGQD6fN7RMoLkqEis4E1khFK8h9HzZ6DIePxTz1snm6uH6_uZvcPt8uri_uZkUyWmVQ9yBataJVlHJUwDLjrGDphjZKmOxOmXaDtHVdW9q5r0VnBOBNniisD4rBZbrk2wkqvkx_rWTqC199CTM8aUvFmQO0EylaAVFT0ciEWXaukBdmhkdJaPrHElmVSzDmh--UxqqcQdN0whaCnECaxhlBd51sX1jc3HpPOxmMwaH1CU-od_l__F_KOkyk</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Vaccaro, Anahí S.</creator><creator>Filloy, Julieta</creator><creator>Bellocq, M. Isabel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-1716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix</title><author>Vaccaro, Anahí S. ; Filloy, Julieta ; Bellocq, M. Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural matrix</topic><topic>Atlantic Forest</topic><topic>Forest matrix</topic><topic>Landscape fragmentation</topic><topic>Native habitat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaccaro, Anahí S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filloy, Julieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellocq, M. Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Perspectives in ecology and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaccaro, Anahí S.</au><au>Filloy, Julieta</au><au>Bellocq, M. Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives in ecology and conservation</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>9-17</pages><issn>2530-0644</issn><eissn>2530-0644</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Functional and taxonomic composition of bird assemblages inside cities vary with the surrounding habitat.•A landscape matrix mainly composed of native habitat may mitigate the urban impact on native communities.•Species and traits turnover was more evident in the agricultural than in the forest landscape matrix.•Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component and sure successful bird breed. Urbanization represents one of the most striking threats to biodiversity due to habitat loss and fragmentation, particularly in forest biomes. The role of the surrounding matrix in maintaining native diversity in urban areas remains poorly studied. We compared taxonomic and functional bird diversity and dissimilarity between urban settlements (USs) and natural habitats (NHs) in the forest landscape matrix (FM) and agriculture landscape matrix (AM) of the Atlantic Forest of South America, and explored the relationships of species traits between USs and NHs. Birds were surveyed in five USs and five NHs in the FM, and four USs and three NHs in the AM using point counts. We used generalized least squares models to test for differences in diversities and dissimilarities between sites from the two landscapes, and the similarity percentage and fourth-corner analysis to determine the bird species and traits that contributed most to the differences between habitat types. Taxonomic and functional diversities were higher and dissimilarities were lower for US in the FM than for those in the AM. Species with urban and generalist traits occurred in all USs, but assemblages also included forest species in the FM. Urban areas should be managed to maintain a forest component, provided that it is necessary for forest bird species to breed successfully.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pecon.2021.10.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-1716</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2530-0644
ispartof Perspectives in ecology and conservation, 2022-01, Vol.20 (1), p.9-17
issn 2530-0644
2530-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3e453a4603b47378564da48ec44dd2a
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural matrix
Atlantic Forest
Forest matrix
Landscape fragmentation
Native habitat
title Bird taxonomic and functional diversity in urban settlements within a forest biome vary with the landscape matrix
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A27%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bird%20taxonomic%20and%20functional%20diversity%20in%20urban%20settlements%20within%20a%20forest%20biome%20vary%20with%20the%20landscape%20matrix&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20in%20ecology%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Vaccaro,%20Anah%C3%AD%20S.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=9-17&rft.issn=2530-0644&rft.eissn=2530-0644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.10.001&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2530064421000882%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-46ba45ed356d12e63c1a2f81ef3dc64c893c57edbf26d4bf85efd312139626ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true