Loading…
Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions
Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increase...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in veterinary science 2019-04, Vol.6, p.105 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Frontiers in veterinary science |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Huber, Nikolaus Marasco, Valeria Painer, Johanna Vetter, Sebastian G Göritz, Frank Kaczensky, Petra Walzer, Chris |
description | Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer (
) under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan;
) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00105 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3f9231efbc34c8d9a7dde3c9e256faf</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f3f9231efbc34c8d9a7dde3c9e256faf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2216774299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS0EolXpnRPaI5ek_ti11xyQqqhApEhwAPVozXrHqcNmHWxnpfz3OElbtaexPe_9xqNHyEdG50K0-sZNmNOcU6bnlDLavCGXnGs1Y0rqty_OF-Q6pQ0tmqZWoqXvyYVgVHAum0uyWeH-b7CHjNUi7Py4rhawA-vz4Ut1O1bLMeM6QvYTVr8gwhYzxsqFWN37oR-8w-oeBwexVJ8f_FgoY8I4FUs42-OE4_GSPpB3DoaE14_1ivz5dvd78WO2-vl9ubhdzWwteZ7pllvbMtlhT1vBGEhuO8WE6KFVHUqJFG3XNgiSasZqLRrBwUpVWwHQWnFFlmduH2BjdtFvIR5MAG9ODyGuDcTs7YDGCae5YOg6K2rb9hpU36OwGnkjHbjC-npm7fbdFntbVokwvIK-7oz-wazDZGStaGEUwOdHQAz_9piy2fpkcRhgxLBPhnMmlaq51kVKz1IbQ0oR3fMYRs0xcXNK3BwTN6fEi-XTy-89G57yFf8BScOrDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216774299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huber, Nikolaus ; Marasco, Valeria ; Painer, Johanna ; Vetter, Sebastian G ; Göritz, Frank ; Kaczensky, Petra ; Walzer, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Huber, Nikolaus ; Marasco, Valeria ; Painer, Johanna ; Vetter, Sebastian G ; Göritz, Frank ; Kaczensky, Petra ; Walzer, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer (
) under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan;
) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31032265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>animal welfare ; conservation interventions ; endocrine-immune interaction ; leukocyte coping capacity ; stress ; Veterinary Science ; wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019-04, Vol.6, p.105</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Huber, Marasco, Painer, Vetter, Göritz, Kaczensky and Walzer. 2019 Huber, Marasco, Painer, Vetter, Göritz, Kaczensky and Walzer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470256/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470256/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huber, Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marasco, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painer, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sebastian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göritz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaczensky, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walzer, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions</title><title>Frontiers in veterinary science</title><addtitle>Front Vet Sci</addtitle><description>Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer (
) under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan;
) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.</description><subject>animal welfare</subject><subject>conservation interventions</subject><subject>endocrine-immune interaction</subject><subject>leukocyte coping capacity</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><issn>2297-1769</issn><issn>2297-1769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS0EolXpnRPaI5ek_ti11xyQqqhApEhwAPVozXrHqcNmHWxnpfz3OElbtaexPe_9xqNHyEdG50K0-sZNmNOcU6bnlDLavCGXnGs1Y0rqty_OF-Q6pQ0tmqZWoqXvyYVgVHAum0uyWeH-b7CHjNUi7Py4rhawA-vz4Ut1O1bLMeM6QvYTVr8gwhYzxsqFWN37oR-8w-oeBwexVJ8f_FgoY8I4FUs42-OE4_GSPpB3DoaE14_1ivz5dvd78WO2-vl9ubhdzWwteZ7pllvbMtlhT1vBGEhuO8WE6KFVHUqJFG3XNgiSasZqLRrBwUpVWwHQWnFFlmduH2BjdtFvIR5MAG9ODyGuDcTs7YDGCae5YOg6K2rb9hpU36OwGnkjHbjC-npm7fbdFntbVokwvIK-7oz-wazDZGStaGEUwOdHQAz_9piy2fpkcRhgxLBPhnMmlaq51kVKz1IbQ0oR3fMYRs0xcXNK3BwTN6fEi-XTy-89G57yFf8BScOrDQ</recordid><startdate>20190411</startdate><enddate>20190411</enddate><creator>Huber, Nikolaus</creator><creator>Marasco, Valeria</creator><creator>Painer, Johanna</creator><creator>Vetter, Sebastian G</creator><creator>Göritz, Frank</creator><creator>Kaczensky, Petra</creator><creator>Walzer, Chris</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190411</creationdate><title>Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions</title><author>Huber, Nikolaus ; Marasco, Valeria ; Painer, Johanna ; Vetter, Sebastian G ; Göritz, Frank ; Kaczensky, Petra ; Walzer, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>animal welfare</topic><topic>conservation interventions</topic><topic>endocrine-immune interaction</topic><topic>leukocyte coping capacity</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huber, Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marasco, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painer, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sebastian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göritz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaczensky, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walzer, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huber, Nikolaus</au><au>Marasco, Valeria</au><au>Painer, Johanna</au><au>Vetter, Sebastian G</au><au>Göritz, Frank</au><au>Kaczensky, Petra</au><au>Walzer, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle><addtitle>Front Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2019-04-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>105</spage><pages>105-</pages><issn>2297-1769</issn><eissn>2297-1769</eissn><abstract>Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer (
) under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan;
) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>31032265</pmid><doi>10.3389/fvets.2019.00105</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2297-1769 |
ispartof | Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019-04, Vol.6, p.105 |
issn | 2297-1769 2297-1769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3f9231efbc34c8d9a7dde3c9e256faf |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | animal welfare conservation interventions endocrine-immune interaction leukocyte coping capacity stress Veterinary Science wildlife management |
title | Leukocyte Coping Capacity: An Integrative Parameter for Wildlife Welfare Within Conservation Interventions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A38%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leukocyte%20Coping%20Capacity:%20An%20Integrative%20Parameter%20for%20Wildlife%20Welfare%20Within%20Conservation%20Interventions&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20veterinary%20science&rft.au=Huber,%20Nikolaus&rft.date=2019-04-11&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=105&rft.pages=105-&rft.issn=2297-1769&rft.eissn=2297-1769&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fvets.2019.00105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2216774299%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-982cc816bed08311a62cb7133da87be66e0ecb85ea60911493532ac674c3aa8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216774299&rft_id=info:pmid/31032265&rfr_iscdi=true |