Feasibility of modified radical mastectomy with nipple-areola preservation combined with stage I prosthesis implantation using air cavity-free suspension hook in patients with breast cancer

Mastoscopic surgery is proven to have lower incidence of postoperative complications and better postoperative recovery than traditional breast cancer surgery. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of mastoscopic modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with skin nipple-areola preservation under air c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgical oncology 2021-04, Vol.19 (1), p.108-108, Article 108
Main Authors: Liu, Jiaqi, Yu, Heshan, He, Yuxiao, Yan, Ting, Ding, Yu, Chu, Jun, Gao, Ning, Lin, Xiaona, Xu, Yanbin, He, Guijin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Breast cancer
Breast implant
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
China
Complications
Development and progression
Edema
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Hospitals
Humans
Implantation
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mammaplasty
Mammaplasty - adverse effects
Mammography
Mastectomy
Mastectomy, Modified Radical
Mastectomy, Subcutaneous
Metastasis
Methods
Modified radical mastectomy
Necrosis
Nipples - surgery
Patient outcomes
Patients
Preservation
Prognosis
Prostheses
Prosthesis Implantation
Quality assessment
Quality of Life
Radiation therapy
Retrospective Studies
Silicones
Skin
Surgery
Surgical drains
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Wound drainage
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mastoscopic surgery is proven to have lower incidence of postoperative complications and better postoperative recovery than traditional breast cancer surgery. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of mastoscopic modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with skin nipple-areola preservation under air cavity-free suspension hook and stage I silicone prosthesis implantation (SMALND) compared with routine MRM. This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent MRM for breast cancer at the Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019. Surgical outcomes, complications, satisfaction, and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast [FACT-B] [Chinese version]) were compared between the two groups. A total of 87 patients were enrolled, with 30 underwent SMALND and 57 underwent routine MRM. The intraoperative blood loss in the SMALND group was lower than in the control group (165.3±44.1 vs. 201.4±52.7 ml, P=0.001), the operation time was longer (220.5±23.9 vs. 155.6±9.2 min, P
ISSN:1477-7819
1477-7819
DOI:10.1186/s12957-021-02220-7