Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis

• Published in: BMJ open quality 2021-09, Vol.10 (3), p.e001421
• Main Authors: Sharma, Anjana E, Huang, Beatrice, Del Rosario, Jan Bing, Yang, Janine, Boscardin, W John, Sarkar, Urmimala, Aquino, Ana Vilma, Burns, Judith, Cotterhill, Robin, Glassey, Barbara, Harris, Roxie, Kincaid, Sharon, Lee, Shin-Yu, Leung, Lydia, Damaris Mendez, C, McKenna, Patrick, Mosteiro, Isela, Noonan, Kathleen, Orisan, Adeola Oni, Redmond, Jane, Thompson, Forrest
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambulatory care; Caregivers; Cluster analysis; Communication; Comorbidity; Councils; Disease management; Drug administration; Emergency medical care; Epidemiology; Hospitals; Humans; measurement/epidemiology; medical error; Mental health; Mixed methods research; Original Research; Patient education; patient participation; Patient Safety; People with disabilities; Primary care; Risk Management; Safety Management; Side effects; Socioeconomic factors; Stakeholders
• ISSN: 2399-6641; 2399-6641
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001421

ObjectivesPatients and caregivers are the primary stakeholders in ambulatory safety, given they perform daily chronic disease self-management, medication administration and outpatient follow-up. However, little attention has been given to their role in adverse events. We identified themes related to patient and caregiver factors and challenges in ambulatory safety incident reports from a Patient Safety Organization.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods analysis of ambulatory incident reports submitted to the Collaborative Healthcare Patient Safety Organization, including 450 hospitals or clinic members in 13 US states. We included events that had patient and/or caregiver behavioural, socioeconomic and clinical factors that may have contributed to the event. Two members of the team independently coded patient/caregiver factors, with dual coding of 20% of events. We then conducted a ‘frequent item set’ analysis to identify which factors most frequently co-occurred. We applied inductive analysis to the most frequent sets to interpret themes. Our team included a diverse stakeholder advisory council of patients, caregivers and healthcare staff.ResultsWe analysed 522 incident reports and excluded 73 for a final sample of 449 events. Our co-occurrence analysis found the following three themes: (1) clinical advice may conflict with patient priorities; (2) breakdowns in communication and patient education cause medication adverse events and (3) patients with disabilities are vulnerable to the external environment.ConclusionsAmbulatory safety reports capture both structural and behavioural factors contributing to adverse events. Actionable takeaways include the following: improving clinician counselling of patients to convey medical advice to elicit priorities, enhanced education regarding medication adverse events and expanding safety precautions for patients with disabilities at home. Ambulatory safety reporting must include patients in reporting and event review for better mitigation of future harm.