Fiducial markers visibility and artefacts in prostate cancer radiotherapy multi-modality imaging

• Published in: Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2019-12, Vol.14 (1), p.237-13, Article 237
• Main Authors: Osman, Sarah O S, Russell, Emily, King, Raymond B, Crowther, Karen, Jain, Suneil, McGrath, Cormac, Hounsell, Alan R, Prise, Kevin M, McGarry, Conor K
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Artefacts; Bones; Cancer research; Cancer therapies; CAT scans; Computed tomography; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - standards; Cubes; Diagnostic imaging; Fiducial Markers; Ghosts; Gold; Gold - analysis; Humans; IGRT; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards; Male; Markers; Medical equipment industry; Medical imaging; Multi-modality imaging; Multimodal Imaging - instrumentation; Multimodal Imaging - standards; Organs at Risk - radiation effects; Patients; Pelvic phantom; Phantoms, Imaging; Polymer industry; Polymers; Polyvinyl chloride; Prostate Cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - instrumentation; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - standards; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods; Signal-To-Noise Ratio; Spatial distribution; Studies; Three dimensional printing
• ISSN: 1748-717X; 1748-717X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1447-1

In this study, a novel pelvic phantom was developed and used to assess the visibility and presence of artefacts from different types of commercial fiducial markers (FMs) on multi-modality imaging relevant to prostate cancer. The phantom was designed with 3D printed hollow cubes in the centre. These cubes were filled with gel to mimic the prostate gland and two parallel PVC rods were used to mimic bones in the pelvic region. Each cube was filled with gelatine and three unique FMs were positioned with a clinically-relevant spatial distribution. The FMs investigated were; Gold Marker (GM) CIVCO, GM RiverPoint, GM Gold Anchor (GA) line and ball shape, and polymer marker (PM) from CIVCO. The phantom was scanned using several imaging modalities typically used to image prostate cancer patients; MRI, CT, CBCT, planar kV-pair, ExacTrac, 6MV, 2.5MV and integrated EPID imaging. The visibility of the markers and any observed artefacts in the phantom were compared to in-vivo scans of prostate cancer patients with FMs. All GMs were visible in volumetric scans, however, they also had the most visible artefacts on CT and CBCT scans, with the magnitude of artefacts increasing with FM size. PM FMs had the least visible artefacts in volumetric scans but they were not visible on portal images and had poor visibility on lateral kV images. The smallest diameter GMs (GA) were the most difficult GMs to identify on lateral kV images. The choice between different FMs is also dependent on the adopted IGRT strategy. PM was found to be superior to investigated gold markers in the most commonly used modalities in the management of prostate cancer; CT, CBCT and MRI imaging.