Loading…
Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean
Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133 |
container_end_page | e274 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e274 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Pina-Amargós, Fabián González-Sansón, Gaspar Martín-Blanco, Félix Valdivia, Abel |
description | Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.274 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543504597</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543504597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rHCEUhofS0oQ0F_0DRSiU9mK3fo56UwhLmgYCvWnvCuI4x12XWd3qzEL-fd1smuyWqqCc9_FVj6dp3hI8l5LIz1uAvJ5TyV8055S0cqaY0C-P1mfNZSlrXJuiLVbsdXNGeauUEuy8-XW9Cz1EB8injLY5jeDGkCJKHo02L2GEHmUAj3woK1SFcQVo2CtlRBubQ4SqF8g7QOGgLmq068DGN80rb4cCl4_zRfPz6_WPxbfZ3feb28XV3cyJVo4zqnHnvAQvWiGcbInoCPaEa4IJlS12gnrXdtg7TjTmniuiCCGSS0u5IIxdNLcH3z7ZtdnmUO91b5IN5iGQ8tLYPAY3gPECd8JrLbAjnCnXOSo1dZY7rBVlqnp9OXhtp24DvYM4ZjucmJ4qMazMMu0M04xKxqvBx0eDnH5PNUtmE4qDYbAR0lQMEYRSKuqo6Pt_0HWacqypMkQLRSWpd3ymlrY-IESf6rlub2quBGcCc6Flpeb_oWrvYRNciuBDjZ9s-HC0YQV2GFclDdP-98sp-OkAupxKyeCfkkGw2ZegeShBU0uwsu-Os_dE_i049gfyAtMW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1958271143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><description>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24688853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Analysis ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation Biology ; Coral reefs ; Developing countries ; Ecology ; Ecosystem Science ; Enforcement ; Environmental protection ; Fish ; Fisheries management ; Fishes ; Fishing ; Fishing (Recreation) ; LDCs ; Marine Biology ; Marine conservation ; Marine reserves ; National parks ; Nature reserves ; Overfishing ; Protection and preservation ; Species ; Studies ; Surveys ; Target reef fish ; Underwater resources ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Pina-Amagós et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Pina-Amagós et al. 2014 Pina-Amagós et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1958271143/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1958271143?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation Biology</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem Science</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing (Recreation)</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine reserves</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Overfishing</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Target reef fish</subject><subject>Underwater resources</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rHCEUhofS0oQ0F_0DRSiU9mK3fo56UwhLmgYCvWnvCuI4x12XWd3qzEL-fd1smuyWqqCc9_FVj6dp3hI8l5LIz1uAvJ5TyV8055S0cqaY0C-P1mfNZSlrXJuiLVbsdXNGeauUEuy8-XW9Cz1EB8injLY5jeDGkCJKHo02L2GEHmUAj3woK1SFcQVo2CtlRBubQ4SqF8g7QOGgLmq068DGN80rb4cCl4_zRfPz6_WPxbfZ3feb28XV3cyJVo4zqnHnvAQvWiGcbInoCPaEa4IJlS12gnrXdtg7TjTmniuiCCGSS0u5IIxdNLcH3z7ZtdnmUO91b5IN5iGQ8tLYPAY3gPECd8JrLbAjnCnXOSo1dZY7rBVlqnp9OXhtp24DvYM4ZjucmJ4qMazMMu0M04xKxqvBx0eDnH5PNUtmE4qDYbAR0lQMEYRSKuqo6Pt_0HWacqypMkQLRSWpd3ymlrY-IESf6rlub2quBGcCc6Flpeb_oWrvYRNciuBDjZ9s-HC0YQV2GFclDdP-98sp-OkAupxKyeCfkkGw2ZegeShBU0uwsu-Os_dE_i049gfyAtMW</recordid><startdate>20140220</startdate><enddate>20140220</enddate><creator>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creator><creator>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creator><creator>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creator><creator>Valdivia, Abel</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140220</creationdate><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><author>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation Biology</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem Science</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing (Recreation)</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine reserves</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Overfishing</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Target reef fish</topic><topic>Underwater resources</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</au><au>González-Sansón, Gaspar</au><au>Martín-Blanco, Félix</au><au>Valdivia, Abel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2014-02-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>e274</spage><epage>e274</epage><pages>e274-e274</pages><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>24688853</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.274</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Abundance Analysis Biodiversity Biomass Commercial fishing Conservation Biology Coral reefs Developing countries Ecology Ecosystem Science Enforcement Environmental protection Fish Fisheries management Fishes Fishing Fishing (Recreation) LDCs Marine Biology Marine conservation Marine reserves National parks Nature reserves Overfishing Protection and preservation Species Studies Surveys Target reef fish Underwater resources Wildlife conservation |
title | Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20protection%20of%20targeted%20reef%20fish%20on%20the%20largest%20marine%20reserve%20in%20the%20Caribbean&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Pina-Amarg%C3%B3s,%20Fabi%C3%A1n&rft.date=2014-02-20&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=e274&rft.epage=e274&rft.pages=e274-e274&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.274&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543504597%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1958271143&rft_id=info:pmid/24688853&rft_galeid=A543504597&rfr_iscdi=true |