Loading…

Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean

Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274
Main Authors: Pina-Amargós, Fabián, González-Sansón, Gaspar, Martín-Blanco, Félix, Valdivia, Abel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133
container_end_page e274
container_issue
container_start_page e274
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 2
creator Pina-Amargós, Fabián
González-Sansón, Gaspar
Martín-Blanco, Félix
Valdivia, Abel
description Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.274
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543504597</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543504597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rHCEUhofS0oQ0F_0DRSiU9mK3fo56UwhLmgYCvWnvCuI4x12XWd3qzEL-fd1smuyWqqCc9_FVj6dp3hI8l5LIz1uAvJ5TyV8055S0cqaY0C-P1mfNZSlrXJuiLVbsdXNGeauUEuy8-XW9Cz1EB8injLY5jeDGkCJKHo02L2GEHmUAj3woK1SFcQVo2CtlRBubQ4SqF8g7QOGgLmq068DGN80rb4cCl4_zRfPz6_WPxbfZ3feb28XV3cyJVo4zqnHnvAQvWiGcbInoCPaEa4IJlS12gnrXdtg7TjTmniuiCCGSS0u5IIxdNLcH3z7ZtdnmUO91b5IN5iGQ8tLYPAY3gPECd8JrLbAjnCnXOSo1dZY7rBVlqnp9OXhtp24DvYM4ZjucmJ4qMazMMu0M04xKxqvBx0eDnH5PNUtmE4qDYbAR0lQMEYRSKuqo6Pt_0HWacqypMkQLRSWpd3ymlrY-IESf6rlub2quBGcCc6Flpeb_oWrvYRNciuBDjZ9s-HC0YQV2GFclDdP-98sp-OkAupxKyeCfkkGw2ZegeShBU0uwsu-Os_dE_i049gfyAtMW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1958271143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><description>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24688853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Analysis ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation Biology ; Coral reefs ; Developing countries ; Ecology ; Ecosystem Science ; Enforcement ; Environmental protection ; Fish ; Fisheries management ; Fishes ; Fishing ; Fishing (Recreation) ; LDCs ; Marine Biology ; Marine conservation ; Marine reserves ; National parks ; Nature reserves ; Overfishing ; Protection and preservation ; Species ; Studies ; Surveys ; Target reef fish ; Underwater resources ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Pina-Amagós et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Pina-Amagós et al. 2014 Pina-Amagós et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1958271143/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1958271143?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation Biology</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem Science</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing (Recreation)</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine reserves</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Overfishing</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Target reef fish</subject><subject>Underwater resources</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rHCEUhofS0oQ0F_0DRSiU9mK3fo56UwhLmgYCvWnvCuI4x12XWd3qzEL-fd1smuyWqqCc9_FVj6dp3hI8l5LIz1uAvJ5TyV8055S0cqaY0C-P1mfNZSlrXJuiLVbsdXNGeauUEuy8-XW9Cz1EB8injLY5jeDGkCJKHo02L2GEHmUAj3woK1SFcQVo2CtlRBubQ4SqF8g7QOGgLmq068DGN80rb4cCl4_zRfPz6_WPxbfZ3feb28XV3cyJVo4zqnHnvAQvWiGcbInoCPaEa4IJlS12gnrXdtg7TjTmniuiCCGSS0u5IIxdNLcH3z7ZtdnmUO91b5IN5iGQ8tLYPAY3gPECd8JrLbAjnCnXOSo1dZY7rBVlqnp9OXhtp24DvYM4ZjucmJ4qMazMMu0M04xKxqvBx0eDnH5PNUtmE4qDYbAR0lQMEYRSKuqo6Pt_0HWacqypMkQLRSWpd3ymlrY-IESf6rlub2quBGcCc6Flpeb_oWrvYRNciuBDjZ9s-HC0YQV2GFclDdP-98sp-OkAupxKyeCfkkGw2ZegeShBU0uwsu-Os_dE_i049gfyAtMW</recordid><startdate>20140220</startdate><enddate>20140220</enddate><creator>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creator><creator>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creator><creator>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creator><creator>Valdivia, Abel</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140220</creationdate><title>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</title><author>Pina-Amargós, Fabián ; González-Sansón, Gaspar ; Martín-Blanco, Félix ; Valdivia, Abel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation Biology</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem Science</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing (Recreation)</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine reserves</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Overfishing</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Target reef fish</topic><topic>Underwater resources</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sansón, Gaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Blanco, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdivia, Abel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pina-Amargós, Fabián</au><au>González-Sansón, Gaspar</au><au>Martín-Blanco, Félix</au><au>Valdivia, Abel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2014-02-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>e274</spage><epage>e274</epage><pages>e274-e274</pages><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Marine reserves can restore fish abundance and diversity in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves in developing countries where resources for enforcement are limited, have seldom been evaluated. Here we assess whether the establishment in 1996 of the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean, Gardens of the Queen in Cuba, has had a positive effect on the abundance of commercially valuable reef fish species in relation to neighboring unprotected areas. We surveyed 25 sites, including two reef habitats (reef crest and reef slope), inside and outside the marine reserve, on five different months, and over a one-and-a-half year period. Densities of the ten most frequent, highly targeted, and relatively large fish species showed a significant variability across the archipelago for both reef habitats that depended on the month of survey. These ten species showed a tendency towards higher abundance inside the reserve in both reef habitats for most months during the study. Average fish densities pooled by protection level, however, showed that five out of these ten species were at least two-fold significantly higher inside than outside the reserve at one or both reef habitats. Supporting evidence from previously published studies in the area indicates that habitat complexity and major benthic communities were similar inside and outside the reserve, while fishing pressure appeared to be homogeneous across the archipelago before reserve establishment. Although poaching may occur within the reserve, especially at the boundaries, effective protection from fishing was the most plausible explanation for the patterns observed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>24688853</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.274</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2014-02, Vol.2, p.e274-e274
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f50b5f9950c1438cbc2792ca4c098238
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Abundance
Analysis
Biodiversity
Biomass
Commercial fishing
Conservation Biology
Coral reefs
Developing countries
Ecology
Ecosystem Science
Enforcement
Environmental protection
Fish
Fisheries management
Fishes
Fishing
Fishing (Recreation)
LDCs
Marine Biology
Marine conservation
Marine reserves
National parks
Nature reserves
Overfishing
Protection and preservation
Species
Studies
Surveys
Target reef fish
Underwater resources
Wildlife conservation
title Evidence for protection of targeted reef fish on the largest marine reserve in the Caribbean
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20protection%20of%20targeted%20reef%20fish%20on%20the%20largest%20marine%20reserve%20in%20the%20Caribbean&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Pina-Amarg%C3%B3s,%20Fabi%C3%A1n&rft.date=2014-02-20&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=e274&rft.epage=e274&rft.pages=e274-e274&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.274&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543504597%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-290bcf7ef5655c7615b10f1491012760c52fc6b0fc41904f4818111747a245133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1958271143&rft_id=info:pmid/24688853&rft_galeid=A543504597&rfr_iscdi=true