Loading…

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility

Teat disinfection is a recommended preventive tool to improve udder health and to prevent new intramammary infections. However, side effects are discussed, such as bacterial selection of less-susceptible bacteria with the application of certain teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2022-01, Vol.105 (1), p.734-747
Main Authors: Schwenker, J.A., Schotte, U., Hölzel, C.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143
container_end_page 747
container_issue 1
container_start_page 734
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 105
creator Schwenker, J.A.
Schotte, U.
Hölzel, C.S.
description Teat disinfection is a recommended preventive tool to improve udder health and to prevent new intramammary infections. However, side effects are discussed, such as bacterial selection of less-susceptible bacteria with the application of certain teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to assess the species composition and bacterial in vitro susceptibility by means of an interventive trial. For this purpose, 3 different postmilking teat treatments (disinfection with 0.215% chlorhexidine or 3.5% lactic acid, or control group with no dipping) were applied to 28 cows in a 6-d intervention approach using a split-udder design. Milk samples were taken before and after intervention. Bacteria were cultured and differentiated to species or genus level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined, and MIC changes over time were recorded. Susceptibilities to chlorhexidine and lactic acid were compared between species of the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and others. Species composition changed during the intervention. Under the treatment of chlorhexidine and lactic acid, the proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) decreased. An increased proportion of species belonging to the genus Corynebacterium was observed especially under the application of lactic acid. Although both teat disinfectants were basically effective, isolates differed in their susceptibility to both teat disinfectants. Populations of CNS, Staphylococcus aureus, and Corynebacterium spp. showed significantly lower absolute MIC values for chlorhexidine. Compared with other species, Corynebacterium spp. showed the lowest susceptibility for chlorhexidine as well as for lactic acid. A significant increase in MIC values after 6 d of intervention was observed with the lactic acid treatment in all isolates, as well as in CNS. This increase can be interpreted as either adaptation of isolates or displacement of more-susceptible species by less-susceptible species. Further studies using long-term intervention might reveal more pronounced effects on MIC values and species composition.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2021-20824
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f56b0d32d5134320a0fe8111fbdfa75b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030221009802</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f56b0d32d5134320a0fe8111fbdfa75b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2596013991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhlcIRNPClSPykcsGf-4Ht6oCWqmIC5wtrz1uHO3awXYq8n_4oUyS0hsny6NnHnvmbZp3jK4F64aPW1fWnHLWcjpw-aJZMcVVK9g4vGxWlHLeUkH5RXNZyhavjFP1urkQsledlGrV_PkWYlj2CwlxE6ZQUz4Qm6KFWLOpIcVCkid2M6e8gd_BhQgtMdGR2dgaLDE2uHYyBRypYCpxoYTowVYTa_lEriOKK-RH9KGM1BzMTEwpUJB7IBNa4FQrMGPXkTnay75Y2FX80Rzq4U3zypu5wNun86r5-eXzj5vb9v7717ub6_vWSkVrq-jknOvcRGnfg3MgYPS8B2ZHyUcGvJsYgKMD7mHwxknpTd_LQYAfnGBSXDV3Z69LZqt3OSwmH3QyQZ8KKT9ok3HqGbRX3USd4E4xIQWnhnoYGGN-cihVE7o-nF27nH7toVS9BJxpnk2EtC-aq7GjTIwjQ3R9Rm1OpWTwz08zqo8pa0xZH1PWp5Sx4f2Tez8t4J7xf7EiMJwBwG09Bsi62ACYqgsZt4zjhP-5_wKN47rE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596013991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schwenker, J.A. ; Schotte, U. ; Hölzel, C.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwenker, J.A. ; Schotte, U. ; Hölzel, C.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Teat disinfection is a recommended preventive tool to improve udder health and to prevent new intramammary infections. However, side effects are discussed, such as bacterial selection of less-susceptible bacteria with the application of certain teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to assess the species composition and bacterial in vitro susceptibility by means of an interventive trial. For this purpose, 3 different postmilking teat treatments (disinfection with 0.215% chlorhexidine or 3.5% lactic acid, or control group with no dipping) were applied to 28 cows in a 6-d intervention approach using a split-udder design. Milk samples were taken before and after intervention. Bacteria were cultured and differentiated to species or genus level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined, and MIC changes over time were recorded. Susceptibilities to chlorhexidine and lactic acid were compared between species of the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and others. Species composition changed during the intervention. Under the treatment of chlorhexidine and lactic acid, the proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) decreased. An increased proportion of species belonging to the genus Corynebacterium was observed especially under the application of lactic acid. Although both teat disinfectants were basically effective, isolates differed in their susceptibility to both teat disinfectants. Populations of CNS, Staphylococcus aureus, and Corynebacterium spp. showed significantly lower absolute MIC values for chlorhexidine. Compared with other species, Corynebacterium spp. showed the lowest susceptibility for chlorhexidine as well as for lactic acid. A significant increase in MIC values after 6 d of intervention was observed with the lactic acid treatment in all isolates, as well as in CNS. This increase can be interpreted as either adaptation of isolates or displacement of more-susceptible species by less-susceptible species. Further studies using long-term intervention might reveal more pronounced effects on MIC values and species composition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34756445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases ; chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - pharmacology ; Disinfectants ; Female ; Lactic Acid ; Mammary Glands, Animal ; mastitis pathogens ; Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control ; MIC ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - veterinary ; Milk ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary ; Staphylococcus ; teat disinfection</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2022-01, Vol.105 (1), p.734-747</ispartof><rights>2022 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2022, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030221009802$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34756445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwenker, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotte, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzel, C.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Teat disinfection is a recommended preventive tool to improve udder health and to prevent new intramammary infections. However, side effects are discussed, such as bacterial selection of less-susceptible bacteria with the application of certain teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to assess the species composition and bacterial in vitro susceptibility by means of an interventive trial. For this purpose, 3 different postmilking teat treatments (disinfection with 0.215% chlorhexidine or 3.5% lactic acid, or control group with no dipping) were applied to 28 cows in a 6-d intervention approach using a split-udder design. Milk samples were taken before and after intervention. Bacteria were cultured and differentiated to species or genus level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined, and MIC changes over time were recorded. Susceptibilities to chlorhexidine and lactic acid were compared between species of the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and others. Species composition changed during the intervention. Under the treatment of chlorhexidine and lactic acid, the proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) decreased. An increased proportion of species belonging to the genus Corynebacterium was observed especially under the application of lactic acid. Although both teat disinfectants were basically effective, isolates differed in their susceptibility to both teat disinfectants. Populations of CNS, Staphylococcus aureus, and Corynebacterium spp. showed significantly lower absolute MIC values for chlorhexidine. Compared with other species, Corynebacterium spp. showed the lowest susceptibility for chlorhexidine as well as for lactic acid. A significant increase in MIC values after 6 d of intervention was observed with the lactic acid treatment in all isolates, as well as in CNS. This increase can be interpreted as either adaptation of isolates or displacement of more-susceptible species by less-susceptible species. Further studies using long-term intervention might reveal more pronounced effects on MIC values and species composition.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases</subject><subject>chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Lactic Acid</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Animal</subject><subject>mastitis pathogens</subject><subject>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>MIC</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - veterinary</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>teat disinfection</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhlcIRNPClSPykcsGf-4Ht6oCWqmIC5wtrz1uHO3awXYq8n_4oUyS0hsny6NnHnvmbZp3jK4F64aPW1fWnHLWcjpw-aJZMcVVK9g4vGxWlHLeUkH5RXNZyhavjFP1urkQsledlGrV_PkWYlj2CwlxE6ZQUz4Qm6KFWLOpIcVCkid2M6e8gd_BhQgtMdGR2dgaLDE2uHYyBRypYCpxoYTowVYTa_lEriOKK-RH9KGM1BzMTEwpUJB7IBNa4FQrMGPXkTnay75Y2FX80Rzq4U3zypu5wNun86r5-eXzj5vb9v7717ub6_vWSkVrq-jknOvcRGnfg3MgYPS8B2ZHyUcGvJsYgKMD7mHwxknpTd_LQYAfnGBSXDV3Z69LZqt3OSwmH3QyQZ8KKT9ok3HqGbRX3USd4E4xIQWnhnoYGGN-cihVE7o-nF27nH7toVS9BJxpnk2EtC-aq7GjTIwjQ3R9Rm1OpWTwz08zqo8pa0xZH1PWp5Sx4f2Tez8t4J7xf7EiMJwBwG09Bsi62ACYqgsZt4zjhP-5_wKN47rE</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Schwenker, J.A.</creator><creator>Schotte, U.</creator><creator>Hölzel, C.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility</title><author>Schwenker, J.A. ; Schotte, U. ; Hölzel, C.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Lactic Acid</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Animal</topic><topic>mastitis pathogens</topic><topic>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>MIC</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - veterinary</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>teat disinfection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwenker, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotte, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzel, C.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwenker, J.A.</au><au>Schotte, U.</au><au>Hölzel, C.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>734</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>734-747</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Teat disinfection is a recommended preventive tool to improve udder health and to prevent new intramammary infections. However, side effects are discussed, such as bacterial selection of less-susceptible bacteria with the application of certain teat disinfectants. The objective of this study was to assess the species composition and bacterial in vitro susceptibility by means of an interventive trial. For this purpose, 3 different postmilking teat treatments (disinfection with 0.215% chlorhexidine or 3.5% lactic acid, or control group with no dipping) were applied to 28 cows in a 6-d intervention approach using a split-udder design. Milk samples were taken before and after intervention. Bacteria were cultured and differentiated to species or genus level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined, and MIC changes over time were recorded. Susceptibilities to chlorhexidine and lactic acid were compared between species of the genera Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and others. Species composition changed during the intervention. Under the treatment of chlorhexidine and lactic acid, the proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) decreased. An increased proportion of species belonging to the genus Corynebacterium was observed especially under the application of lactic acid. Although both teat disinfectants were basically effective, isolates differed in their susceptibility to both teat disinfectants. Populations of CNS, Staphylococcus aureus, and Corynebacterium spp. showed significantly lower absolute MIC values for chlorhexidine. Compared with other species, Corynebacterium spp. showed the lowest susceptibility for chlorhexidine as well as for lactic acid. A significant increase in MIC values after 6 d of intervention was observed with the lactic acid treatment in all isolates, as well as in CNS. This increase can be interpreted as either adaptation of isolates or displacement of more-susceptible species by less-susceptible species. Further studies using long-term intervention might reveal more pronounced effects on MIC values and species composition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34756445</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2021-20824</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2022-01, Vol.105 (1), p.734-747
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f56b0d32d5134320a0fe8111fbdfa75b
source ScienceDirect Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animals
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine - pharmacology
Disinfectants
Female
Lactic Acid
Mammary Glands, Animal
mastitis pathogens
Mastitis, Bovine - prevention & control
MIC
Microbial Sensitivity Tests - veterinary
Milk
Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control
Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary
Staphylococcus
teat disinfection
title Minimum inhibitory concentrations of chlorhexidine- and lactic acid-based teat disinfectants: An intervention trial assessing bacterial selection and susceptibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20inhibitory%20concentrations%20of%20chlorhexidine-%20and%20lactic%20acid-based%20teat%20disinfectants:%20An%20intervention%20trial%20assessing%20bacterial%20selection%20and%20susceptibility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Schwenker,%20J.A.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=734&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=734-747&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2021-20824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2596013991%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-50bddd6db0077edde3e9f27e1c94291e26b1eed080218fad44fa77483ef8d3143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596013991&rft_id=info:pmid/34756445&rfr_iscdi=true