Transmission of Rickettsia raoultii and Rickettsia massiliae DNA by Dermacentor reticulatus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.) ticks during artificial feeding

• Published in: Parasites & vectors 2018-09, Vol.11 (1), p.494-494, Article 494
• Main Authors: Olivieri, Emanuela, Wijnveld, Michiel, Bonga, Marise, Berger, Laura, Manfredi, Maria T, Veronesi, Fabrizia, Jongejan, Frans
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Arachnids; Artificial feeding; Attachment; Blood; Blood - metabolism; Blood - microbiology; Blood Chemical Analysis - methods; Capacity; Cattle; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Dermacentor - microbiology; Dermacentor reticulatus; Detection; Disease transmission; DNA; DNA, Bacterial - blood; DNA, Bacterial - genetics; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification; Dynamics; Feeding; Feeding Behavior; Female; Fever; Genetic aspects; Genotypes; Hard ticks; Health aspects; Health risks; Humans; Humidity; In vitro feeding; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Membranes; Membranes - chemistry; Membranes - microbiology; Nucleotide sequence; Parasitic diseases; Pathogens; PCR; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Rhipicephalus sanguineus; Rhipicephalus sanguineus - microbiology; Rickettsia - genetics; Rickettsia Infections - microbiology; Rickettsia Infections - transmission; Rickettsia massiliae; Rickettsia raoultii; Rickettsiae; Sheep; Silicones; Tick Infestations - veterinary; Ticks; Transmission; Vectors
• ISSN: 1756-3305; 1756-3305
• DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3075-2

Tick-borne rickettsial pathogens are emerging worldwide and pose an increased health risk to both humans and animals. A plethora of rickettsial species has been identified in ticks recovered from human and animal patients. However, the detection of rickettsial DNA in ticks does not necessarily mean that these ticks can act as vectors for these pathogens. Here, we used artificial feeding of ticks to confirm transmission of Rickettsia massiliae and Rickettsia raoultii by Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu lato) and Dermacentor reticulatus ticks, respectively. The speed of transmission was also determined. An artificial feeding system based on silicone membranes were used to feed adult R. sanguineus (s.l.) and D. reticulatus ticks. Blood samples from in vitro feeding units were analysed for the presence of rickettsial DNA using PCR and reverse line blot hybridisation. The attachment rate of R. sanguineus (s.l.) ticks were 40.4% at 8 h post-application, increasing to 70.2% at 72 h. Rickettsia massiliae was detected in blood samples collected 8 h after the R. sanguineus (s.l.) ticks were placed into the in vitro feeding units. D. reticulatus ticks were pre-fed on sheep and subsequently transferred to the in vitro feeding system. The attachment rate was 29.1 % at 24 h post-application, increasing to 43.6 % at 96 h. Rickettsia raoultii was detected in blood collected 24 h after D. reticulatus was placed into the feeding units. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.) and D. reticulatus ticks are vectors of R. massiliae and R. raoultii, respectively. The transmission of R. massiliae as early as 8 h after tick attachment emphasises the importance of removing ticks as soon as possible to minimise transmission. This study highlights the relevance of in vitro feeding systems to provide insight into the vectorial capacity of ticks and the dynamics of tick-borne pathogen transmission.