Loading…

Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model

Assessing the emission-peaking process of agricultural land use provides valuable insights for mitigating global warming. This study calculated agricultural land-use carbon emissions (ALUCEs) in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the peaking process based on quantitative criteria. Further, we appl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land (Basel) 2024-05, Vol.13 (5), p.585
Main Authors: Wu, Haoyue, Ding, Bangwen, Liu, Lu, Zhou, Lei, Meng, Yue, Zheng, Xiangjiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6a71ed74906e5c8a0a7233655aa3400969c1046b01e1d1829dfd5d3db160de653
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 585
container_title Land (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Wu, Haoyue
Ding, Bangwen
Liu, Lu
Zhou, Lei
Meng, Yue
Zheng, Xiangjiang
description Assessing the emission-peaking process of agricultural land use provides valuable insights for mitigating global warming. This study calculated agricultural land-use carbon emissions (ALUCEs) in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the peaking process based on quantitative criteria. Further, we applied the Tapio decoupling index and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model to discuss the robustness of the peaking process. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, China’s average ALUCEs were 368.1 Mt C-eq (1349.7 CO2-eq), peaking at 396.9 Mt C-eq (1455.3 Mt CO2-eq) in 2015 before plateauing. Emissions from agricultural materials and soil management had entered the declining period, while those from rice cultivation were in the peaking period, those from straw burning were still rising, and those from livestock breeding remained at the plateauing phase. (2) The provinces of Beijing, Tianjin, and nine others saw a decline in ALUCEs, while Hainan, Guizhou, and another nine provinces observed plateauing, and Ningxia, Qinghai, and six other provinces experienced peaking. (3) Decoupling analysis confirmed that emission-peaking states remained stable even with agricultural growth. Instead of an inverted U-shaped relationship, we found an N-shaped relationship between ALUCEs and agricultural GDP. The spatial EKC model indicated that the peaking process had spillover effects between provinces. It is recommended that China accelerate ALUCE mitigation based on the source and phase of emissions, considering the peaking process and magnitude.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/land13050585
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f5f144e34e374d57bb6ffb1d0e56f1c1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A795387979</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f5f144e34e374d57bb6ffb1d0e56f1c1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A795387979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6a71ed74906e5c8a0a7233655aa3400969c1046b01e1d1829dfd5d3db160de653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkd2KFDEQhRtRcFn3zgcIeGuvyeSnO1cytqO7OKLgLngXqpPKbMaeZEy6hXl7oyOyyYEUxamPVFXTvGT0mnNN30wQHeNUUtnLJ83Fina8FUJ-f_ooft5clbKn9WjGeyEvmtMN_EKy3uVgl2leMkxkW0HtfUEyQB5TJJtDKCWkWEiIZHgIEchXhB_o3pJ1rILpVEIh76CgI9X_Hm1ajlOIO3L3gCmfSAWSb0eYQ6VvPg3kc3I4vWieeZgKXv17L5v7D5u74abdfvl4O6y3reWKz62CjqHrhKYKpe2BQrfiXEkJwEXtQ2nLqFAjZcgc61faeScddyNT1KGS_LK5PXNdgr055nCAfDIJgvmbSHlnIM_BTmi89EwI5FWdcLIbR-X9yBxFqTyzrLJenVnHnH4uWGazT0uuEyimTl5LvaqqruuzawcVGqJPcwZbr8NDsCmiDzW_7rTkfac7XQtenwtsTqVk9P-_yaj5s1zzeLn8N7-2lYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059592592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Wu, Haoyue ; Ding, Bangwen ; Liu, Lu ; Zhou, Lei ; Meng, Yue ; Zheng, Xiangjiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haoyue ; Ding, Bangwen ; Liu, Lu ; Zhou, Lei ; Meng, Yue ; Zheng, Xiangjiang</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the emission-peaking process of agricultural land use provides valuable insights for mitigating global warming. This study calculated agricultural land-use carbon emissions (ALUCEs) in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the peaking process based on quantitative criteria. Further, we applied the Tapio decoupling index and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model to discuss the robustness of the peaking process. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, China’s average ALUCEs were 368.1 Mt C-eq (1349.7 CO2-eq), peaking at 396.9 Mt C-eq (1455.3 Mt CO2-eq) in 2015 before plateauing. Emissions from agricultural materials and soil management had entered the declining period, while those from rice cultivation were in the peaking period, those from straw burning were still rising, and those from livestock breeding remained at the plateauing phase. (2) The provinces of Beijing, Tianjin, and nine others saw a decline in ALUCEs, while Hainan, Guizhou, and another nine provinces observed plateauing, and Ningxia, Qinghai, and six other provinces experienced peaking. (3) Decoupling analysis confirmed that emission-peaking states remained stable even with agricultural growth. Instead of an inverted U-shaped relationship, we found an N-shaped relationship between ALUCEs and agricultural GDP. The spatial EKC model indicated that the peaking process had spillover effects between provinces. It is recommended that China accelerate ALUCE mitigation based on the source and phase of emissions, considering the peaking process and magnitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/land13050585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural land ; agricultural land-use carbon emissions ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Carbon dioxide ; China ; Climate change ; Crops ; Cultivation ; Decoupling ; Diesel fuels ; Economic development ; emission peak ; Emissions ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Energy consumption ; Environmental Kuznets curve ; Global warming ; Grain cultivation ; greenhouse gas emissions ; Greenhouse gases ; Land use ; Livestock ; Livestock breeding ; Pesticides ; Rice ; Soil management ; spatial Durbin model ; Tapio decoupling index</subject><ispartof>Land (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.13 (5), p.585</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6a71ed74906e5c8a0a7233655aa3400969c1046b01e1d1829dfd5d3db160de653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9296-4303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059592592/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059592592?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Bangwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiangjiang</creatorcontrib><title>Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model</title><title>Land (Basel)</title><description>Assessing the emission-peaking process of agricultural land use provides valuable insights for mitigating global warming. This study calculated agricultural land-use carbon emissions (ALUCEs) in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the peaking process based on quantitative criteria. Further, we applied the Tapio decoupling index and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model to discuss the robustness of the peaking process. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, China’s average ALUCEs were 368.1 Mt C-eq (1349.7 CO2-eq), peaking at 396.9 Mt C-eq (1455.3 Mt CO2-eq) in 2015 before plateauing. Emissions from agricultural materials and soil management had entered the declining period, while those from rice cultivation were in the peaking period, those from straw burning were still rising, and those from livestock breeding remained at the plateauing phase. (2) The provinces of Beijing, Tianjin, and nine others saw a decline in ALUCEs, while Hainan, Guizhou, and another nine provinces observed plateauing, and Ningxia, Qinghai, and six other provinces experienced peaking. (3) Decoupling analysis confirmed that emission-peaking states remained stable even with agricultural growth. Instead of an inverted U-shaped relationship, we found an N-shaped relationship between ALUCEs and agricultural GDP. The spatial EKC model indicated that the peaking process had spillover effects between provinces. It is recommended that China accelerate ALUCE mitigation based on the source and phase of emissions, considering the peaking process and magnitude.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>agricultural land-use carbon emissions</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Decoupling</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>emission peak</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental Kuznets curve</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Grain cultivation</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock breeding</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>spatial Durbin model</subject><subject>Tapio decoupling index</subject><issn>2073-445X</issn><issn>2073-445X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkd2KFDEQhRtRcFn3zgcIeGuvyeSnO1cytqO7OKLgLngXqpPKbMaeZEy6hXl7oyOyyYEUxamPVFXTvGT0mnNN30wQHeNUUtnLJ83Fina8FUJ-f_ooft5clbKn9WjGeyEvmtMN_EKy3uVgl2leMkxkW0HtfUEyQB5TJJtDKCWkWEiIZHgIEchXhB_o3pJ1rILpVEIh76CgI9X_Hm1ajlOIO3L3gCmfSAWSb0eYQ6VvPg3kc3I4vWieeZgKXv17L5v7D5u74abdfvl4O6y3reWKz62CjqHrhKYKpe2BQrfiXEkJwEXtQ2nLqFAjZcgc61faeScddyNT1KGS_LK5PXNdgr055nCAfDIJgvmbSHlnIM_BTmi89EwI5FWdcLIbR-X9yBxFqTyzrLJenVnHnH4uWGazT0uuEyimTl5LvaqqruuzawcVGqJPcwZbr8NDsCmiDzW_7rTkfac7XQtenwtsTqVk9P-_yaj5s1zzeLn8N7-2lYw</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Wu, Haoyue</creator><creator>Ding, Bangwen</creator><creator>Liu, Lu</creator><creator>Zhou, Lei</creator><creator>Meng, Yue</creator><creator>Zheng, Xiangjiang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-4303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model</title><author>Wu, Haoyue ; Ding, Bangwen ; Liu, Lu ; Zhou, Lei ; Meng, Yue ; Zheng, Xiangjiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6a71ed74906e5c8a0a7233655aa3400969c1046b01e1d1829dfd5d3db160de653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>agricultural land-use carbon emissions</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Decoupling</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>emission peak</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental Kuznets curve</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Grain cultivation</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock breeding</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>spatial Durbin model</topic><topic>Tapio decoupling index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Bangwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiangjiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Haoyue</au><au>Ding, Bangwen</au><au>Liu, Lu</au><au>Zhou, Lei</au><au>Meng, Yue</au><au>Zheng, Xiangjiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model</atitle><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>585</spage><pages>585-</pages><issn>2073-445X</issn><eissn>2073-445X</eissn><abstract>Assessing the emission-peaking process of agricultural land use provides valuable insights for mitigating global warming. This study calculated agricultural land-use carbon emissions (ALUCEs) in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the peaking process based on quantitative criteria. Further, we applied the Tapio decoupling index and environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model to discuss the robustness of the peaking process. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2020, China’s average ALUCEs were 368.1 Mt C-eq (1349.7 CO2-eq), peaking at 396.9 Mt C-eq (1455.3 Mt CO2-eq) in 2015 before plateauing. Emissions from agricultural materials and soil management had entered the declining period, while those from rice cultivation were in the peaking period, those from straw burning were still rising, and those from livestock breeding remained at the plateauing phase. (2) The provinces of Beijing, Tianjin, and nine others saw a decline in ALUCEs, while Hainan, Guizhou, and another nine provinces observed plateauing, and Ningxia, Qinghai, and six other provinces experienced peaking. (3) Decoupling analysis confirmed that emission-peaking states remained stable even with agricultural growth. Instead of an inverted U-shaped relationship, we found an N-shaped relationship between ALUCEs and agricultural GDP. The spatial EKC model indicated that the peaking process had spillover effects between provinces. It is recommended that China accelerate ALUCE mitigation based on the source and phase of emissions, considering the peaking process and magnitude.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/land13050585</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-4303</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-445X
ispartof Land (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.13 (5), p.585
issn 2073-445X
2073-445X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f5f144e34e374d57bb6ffb1d0e56f1c1
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Agricultural industry
Agricultural land
agricultural land-use carbon emissions
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Analysis
Carbon dioxide
China
Climate change
Crops
Cultivation
Decoupling
Diesel fuels
Economic development
emission peak
Emissions
Emissions (Pollution)
Energy consumption
Environmental Kuznets curve
Global warming
Grain cultivation
greenhouse gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Land use
Livestock
Livestock breeding
Pesticides
Rice
Soil management
spatial Durbin model
Tapio decoupling index
title Have Agricultural Land-Use Carbon Emissions in China Peaked? An Analysis Based on Decoupling Theory and Spatial EKC Model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Have%20Agricultural%20Land-Use%20Carbon%20Emissions%20in%20China%20Peaked?%20An%20Analysis%20Based%20on%20Decoupling%20Theory%20and%20Spatial%20EKC%20Model&rft.jtitle=Land%20(Basel)&rft.au=Wu,%20Haoyue&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=585&rft.pages=585-&rft.issn=2073-445X&rft.eissn=2073-445X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/land13050585&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA795387979%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6a71ed74906e5c8a0a7233655aa3400969c1046b01e1d1829dfd5d3db160de653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059592592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A795387979&rfr_iscdi=true