Loading…

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of molecular sciences 2023-10, Vol.24 (19), p.14562
Main Authors: Jamshidi, Parnian, Farsi, Yeganeh, Nariman, Zahra, Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza, Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin, Akbarialiabad, Hossein, Nasiri, Mohammad Javad, Sechi, Leonardo A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 14562
container_title International journal of molecular sciences
container_volume 24
creator Jamshidi, Parnian
Farsi, Yeganeh
Nariman, Zahra
Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza
Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin
Akbarialiabad, Hossein
Nasiri, Mohammad Javad
Sechi, Leonardo A
description Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients’ symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39–2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07–1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59–4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20–5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20–4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijms241914562
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f6ddfc424b08404aaa43edbdc03c5d9e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771809871</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f6ddfc424b08404aaa43edbdc03c5d9e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A771809871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIRD_gyN0SFy5b_Llec0EhohCpFVIJZ8trj4Oj3XWwN63ClT9ep6mAIOTDjMaP3_E7mqp6RfAFYwq_DeshU04U4aKhT6pTwimtMW7k07_yk-os5zXGlFGhnlcnTLaMY4JPq1-XYE2ProNNsQtxMmiZzJg3vRknM4U4ojCiRUphMl0P6EO8gx593Y0uxQHeoVnJ8wRDQS26gdsAd8iMDl3DZOrZaPpdDhlFj25KNQ7hJzg0j-OUYt-XdJmC6fOL6pkvAV4-xvPq2-XH5fxzffXl02I-u6qtoM1Ud0p2mBouhbdcKkq82pswRDBOse98KzovZOMVd2ChaYVUspWk8VaAlIydV4uDrotmrTcpDCbtdDRBPxRiWmmTipEetG-cK10o73DLMTfGcAaucxYzK5yCovX-oLXZdgM4C8WT6Y9Ej2_G8F2v4q0mWEiGiSoKbx4VUvyxhTzpIWQLfZk8xG3WtC1_lgpzUdDX_6DruE1lug9U04iWSPWHWpniIIw-lsZ2L6pnUpIWqzKMQl38hyrHwRBsHMGHUj96UB8elA3JOYH_bZJgvV9BfbSC7B4KLs3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876658179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Jamshidi, Parnian ; Farsi, Yeganeh ; Nariman, Zahra ; Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza ; Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin ; Akbarialiabad, Hossein ; Nasiri, Mohammad Javad ; Sechi, Leonardo A</creator><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Parnian ; Farsi, Yeganeh ; Nariman, Zahra ; Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza ; Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin ; Akbarialiabad, Hossein ; Nasiri, Mohammad Javad ; Sechi, Leonardo A</creatorcontrib><description>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients’ symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39–2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07–1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59–4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20–5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20–4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-6596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914562</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37834010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bias ; Clinical trials ; Colonoscopy ; fecal microbiota transplantation ; Feces ; gastrointestinal microbiome ; Infectious diseases ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; randomized controlled trial ; Review ; Systematic review ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>International journal of molecular sciences, 2023-10, Vol.24 (19), p.14562</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0566-2049 ; 0000-0003-4757-7563 ; 0000-0002-5070-8387 ; 0000-0002-2295-5081 ; 0000-0002-3279-0671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876658179/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876658179?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Parnian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farsi, Yeganeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nariman, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbarialiabad, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Mohammad Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sechi, Leonardo A</creatorcontrib><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><title>International journal of molecular sciences</title><description>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients’ symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39–2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07–1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59–4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20–5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20–4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>fecal microbiota transplantation</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>gastrointestinal microbiome</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIRD_gyN0SFy5b_Llec0EhohCpFVIJZ8trj4Oj3XWwN63ClT9ep6mAIOTDjMaP3_E7mqp6RfAFYwq_DeshU04U4aKhT6pTwimtMW7k07_yk-os5zXGlFGhnlcnTLaMY4JPq1-XYE2ProNNsQtxMmiZzJg3vRknM4U4ojCiRUphMl0P6EO8gx593Y0uxQHeoVnJ8wRDQS26gdsAd8iMDl3DZOrZaPpdDhlFj25KNQ7hJzg0j-OUYt-XdJmC6fOL6pkvAV4-xvPq2-XH5fxzffXl02I-u6qtoM1Ud0p2mBouhbdcKkq82pswRDBOse98KzovZOMVd2ChaYVUspWk8VaAlIydV4uDrotmrTcpDCbtdDRBPxRiWmmTipEetG-cK10o73DLMTfGcAaucxYzK5yCovX-oLXZdgM4C8WT6Y9Ej2_G8F2v4q0mWEiGiSoKbx4VUvyxhTzpIWQLfZk8xG3WtC1_lgpzUdDX_6DruE1lug9U04iWSPWHWpniIIw-lsZ2L6pnUpIWqzKMQl38hyrHwRBsHMGHUj96UB8elA3JOYH_bZJgvV9BfbSC7B4KLs3Q</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Jamshidi, Parnian</creator><creator>Farsi, Yeganeh</creator><creator>Nariman, Zahra</creator><creator>Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza</creator><creator>Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin</creator><creator>Akbarialiabad, Hossein</creator><creator>Nasiri, Mohammad Javad</creator><creator>Sechi, Leonardo A</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-2049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-7563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-8387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-5081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-0671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><author>Jamshidi, Parnian ; Farsi, Yeganeh ; Nariman, Zahra ; Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza ; Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin ; Akbarialiabad, Hossein ; Nasiri, Mohammad Javad ; Sechi, Leonardo A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>fecal microbiota transplantation</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>gastrointestinal microbiome</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Parnian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farsi, Yeganeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nariman, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbarialiabad, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiri, Mohammad Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sechi, Leonardo A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jamshidi, Parnian</au><au>Farsi, Yeganeh</au><au>Nariman, Zahra</au><au>Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza</au><au>Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin</au><au>Akbarialiabad, Hossein</au><au>Nasiri, Mohammad Javad</au><au>Sechi, Leonardo A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>14562</spage><pages>14562-</pages><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><eissn>1422-0067</eissn><abstract>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients’ symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39–2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07–1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59–4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20–5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20–4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37834010</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijms241914562</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-2049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-7563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-8387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-5081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-0671</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1422-0067
ispartof International journal of molecular sciences, 2023-10, Vol.24 (19), p.14562
issn 1422-0067
1661-6596
1422-0067
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f6ddfc424b08404aaa43edbdc03c5d9e
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Analysis
Bias
Clinical trials
Colonoscopy
fecal microbiota transplantation
Feces
gastrointestinal microbiome
Infectious diseases
Irritable bowel syndrome
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Patient satisfaction
Patients
randomized controlled trial
Review
Systematic review
Transplants & implants
title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A26%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fecal%20Microbiota%20Transplantation%20in%20Irritable%20Bowel%20Syndrome:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20molecular%20sciences&rft.au=Jamshidi,%20Parnian&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=14562&rft.pages=14562-&rft.issn=1422-0067&rft.eissn=1422-0067&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijms241914562&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA771809871%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-b97b02a475fc47921f93401a153420fbf85bf576f94dece6857978716fc5e7733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876658179&rft_id=info:pmid/37834010&rft_galeid=A771809871&rfr_iscdi=true