Employment status at transplant influences ethnic disparities in outcomes after deceased donor kidney transplantation

• Published in: BMC nephrology 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.6-6, Article 6
• Main Authors: Divers, Jasmin, Mohan, Sumit, Brown, W Mark, Pastan, Stephen O, Israni, Ajay K, Gaston, Robert S, Bray, Robert, Islam, Shahidul, Sakhovskaya, Natalia V, Mena-Gutierrez, Alejandra M, Reeves-Daniel, Amber M, Julian, Bruce A, Freedman, Barry I
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; African Americans - psychology; Allograft failure; Creatinine; Cultural differences; Cytomegalovirus; Deceased donor kidney transplantation; Employment; Employment status; Ethnicity; Female; Forecasts and trends; Graft Survival; Health care disparities; Humans; Influence; Kidney Failure, Chronic - ethnology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality; Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery; Kidney recipient mortality; Kidney Transplantation; Kidney transplants; Kidneys; Male; Middle Aged; Minority & ethnic groups; Mortality; Nephrology; Organ donors; Outcome disparity; Proportional Hazards Models; Race; Race Factors; Socioeconomic factors; Tissue Donors; Transplantation; Transplantation, Homologous; United States - epidemiology; Variables
• ISSN: 1471-2369; 1471-2369
• DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02631-4

African American (AA) recipients of deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplants (KT) have shorter allograft survival than recipients of other ethnic groups. Reasons for this disparity encompass complex interactions between donors and recipients characteristics. Outcomes from 3872 AA and 19,719 European American (EA) DDs who had one kidney transplanted in an AA recipient and one in an EA recipient were analyzed. Four donor/recipient pair groups (DRP) were studied, AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Survival random forests and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to rank and evaluate modifying effects of DRP on variables associated with allograft survival. These analyses sought to identify factors contributing to the observed disparities in transplant outcomes among AA and EA DDKT recipients. Transplant era, discharge serum creatinine, delayed graft function, and DRP were among the top predictors of allograft survival and mortality among DDKT recipients. Interaction effects between DRP with the kidney donor risk index and transplant era showed significant improvement in allograft survival over time in EA recipients. However, AA recipients appeared to have similar or poorer outcomes for DDKT performed after 2010 versus before 2001; allograft survival hazard ratios (95% CI) were 1.15 (0.74, 1.76) and 1.07 (0.8, 1.45) for AA/AA and EA/AA, compared to 0.62 (0.54, 0.71) and 0.5 (0.41, 0.62) for EA/EA and AA/EA DRP, respectively. Recipient mortality improved over time among all DRP, except unemployed AA/AAs. Relative to DDKT performed pre-2001, employed AA/AAs had HR = 0.37 (0.2, 0.69) versus 0.59 (0.31, 1.11) for unemployed AA/AA after 2010. Relative to DDKT performed before 2001, similar or worse overall DCAS was observed among AA/AAs, while EA/EAs experienced considerable improvement regardless of employment status, KDRI, and EPTS. AA recipients of an AA DDKT, especially if unemployed, had worse allograft survival and mortality and did not appear to benefit from advances in care over the past 20 years.