Loading…
Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices
Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 4792 |
container_title | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Änäkkälä, Mikael Lajunen, Antti Hakojärvi, Mikko Alakukku, Laura |
description | Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rs14194792 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2724304770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1LA0EMhhdRsGgv_oIFb0J1PtKd5lhKqwsVL-p1mJ3J1C3bnTqzK_jv3VpRc0ny8uRNIFl2xdmtlMjuYuLAERSKk2wkmBITEChO_9Xn2TilLRtCSo4MRhktP0zTm64ObR583r1RXra-6am1dBBWNTUuX4TW1Qcm5QM3p1ibJn_sm65Oe7JdHLpyZzaUctO6_JU21B0ty2HOUrrMzrxpEo1_8kX2slo-Lx4m66f7cjFfT6wseDexAGCwqJgXgNxOnTeucqgM2qqYAVivwFcKgQplwTPBC49obMV55Wbo5UVWHn1dMFu9j_XOxE8dTK2_hRA32sSutg1pr5iytnBSSABkWAFWHGlKhbSumB28ro9e-xjee0qd3oY-tsP5WigBkoFSbKBujpSNIaVI_ncrZ_rwFf33FfkF83t_Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724304770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs14194792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>aerial imaging ; Agricultural production ; Cameras ; Coefficient of variation ; Crop fields ; drone ; Drones ; Evaluation ; field conditions ; Influence ; Machine learning ; Mathematical analysis ; multispectral images ; Neural networks ; Normalized difference vegetative index ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; Sensors ; Software ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Variation ; Vegetation ; vegetation index</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4327-9852 ; 0000-0002-2175-7833 ; 0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724304770/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724304770?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</description><subject>aerial imaging</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>drone</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>field conditions</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>multispectral images</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Normalized difference vegetative index</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation index</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1LA0EMhhdRsGgv_oIFb0J1PtKd5lhKqwsVL-p1mJ3J1C3bnTqzK_jv3VpRc0ny8uRNIFl2xdmtlMjuYuLAERSKk2wkmBITEChO_9Xn2TilLRtCSo4MRhktP0zTm64ObR583r1RXra-6am1dBBWNTUuX4TW1Qcm5QM3p1ibJn_sm65Oe7JdHLpyZzaUctO6_JU21B0ty2HOUrrMzrxpEo1_8kX2slo-Lx4m66f7cjFfT6wseDexAGCwqJgXgNxOnTeucqgM2qqYAVivwFcKgQplwTPBC49obMV55Wbo5UVWHn1dMFu9j_XOxE8dTK2_hRA32sSutg1pr5iytnBSSABkWAFWHGlKhbSumB28ro9e-xjee0qd3oY-tsP5WigBkoFSbKBujpSNIaVI_ncrZ_rwFf33FfkF83t_Og</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creator><creator>Lajunen, Antti</creator><creator>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creator><creator>Alakukku, Laura</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-7833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><author>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aerial imaging</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>drone</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>field conditions</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>multispectral images</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Normalized difference vegetative index</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Änäkkälä, Mikael</au><au>Lajunen, Antti</au><au>Hakojärvi, Mikko</au><au>Alakukku, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4792</spage><pages>4792-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs14194792</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-7833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-4292 |
ispartof | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792 |
issn | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | aerial imaging Agricultural production Cameras Coefficient of variation Crop fields drone Drones Evaluation field conditions Influence Machine learning Mathematical analysis multispectral images Neural networks Normalized difference vegetative index Remote sensing Satellites Sensors Software Unmanned aerial vehicles Variation Vegetation vegetation index |
title | Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Influence%20of%20Field%20Conditions%20on%20Aerial%20Multispectral%20Images%20and%20Vegetation%20Indices&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=%C3%84n%C3%A4kk%C3%A4l%C3%A4,%20Mikael&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4792&rft.pages=4792-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs14194792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2724304770%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724304770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |