Loading…

Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices

Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792
Main Authors: Änäkkälä, Mikael, Lajunen, Antti, Hakojärvi, Mikko, Alakukku, Laura
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 4792
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 14
creator Änäkkälä, Mikael
Lajunen, Antti
Hakojärvi, Mikko
Alakukku, Laura
description Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs14194792
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2724304770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1LA0EMhhdRsGgv_oIFb0J1PtKd5lhKqwsVL-p1mJ3J1C3bnTqzK_jv3VpRc0ny8uRNIFl2xdmtlMjuYuLAERSKk2wkmBITEChO_9Xn2TilLRtCSo4MRhktP0zTm64ObR583r1RXra-6am1dBBWNTUuX4TW1Qcm5QM3p1ibJn_sm65Oe7JdHLpyZzaUctO6_JU21B0ty2HOUrrMzrxpEo1_8kX2slo-Lx4m66f7cjFfT6wseDexAGCwqJgXgNxOnTeucqgM2qqYAVivwFcKgQplwTPBC49obMV55Wbo5UVWHn1dMFu9j_XOxE8dTK2_hRA32sSutg1pr5iytnBSSABkWAFWHGlKhbSumB28ro9e-xjee0qd3oY-tsP5WigBkoFSbKBujpSNIaVI_ncrZ_rwFf33FfkF83t_Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724304770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs14194792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>aerial imaging ; Agricultural production ; Cameras ; Coefficient of variation ; Crop fields ; drone ; Drones ; Evaluation ; field conditions ; Influence ; Machine learning ; Mathematical analysis ; multispectral images ; Neural networks ; Normalized difference vegetative index ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; Sensors ; Software ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Variation ; Vegetation ; vegetation index</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4327-9852 ; 0000-0002-2175-7833 ; 0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724304770/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2724304770?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</description><subject>aerial imaging</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>drone</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>field conditions</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>multispectral images</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Normalized difference vegetative index</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation index</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1LA0EMhhdRsGgv_oIFb0J1PtKd5lhKqwsVL-p1mJ3J1C3bnTqzK_jv3VpRc0ny8uRNIFl2xdmtlMjuYuLAERSKk2wkmBITEChO_9Xn2TilLRtCSo4MRhktP0zTm64ObR583r1RXra-6am1dBBWNTUuX4TW1Qcm5QM3p1ibJn_sm65Oe7JdHLpyZzaUctO6_JU21B0ty2HOUrrMzrxpEo1_8kX2slo-Lx4m66f7cjFfT6wseDexAGCwqJgXgNxOnTeucqgM2qqYAVivwFcKgQplwTPBC49obMV55Wbo5UVWHn1dMFu9j_XOxE8dTK2_hRA32sSutg1pr5iytnBSSABkWAFWHGlKhbSumB28ro9e-xjee0qd3oY-tsP5WigBkoFSbKBujpSNIaVI_ncrZ_rwFf33FfkF83t_Og</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creator><creator>Lajunen, Antti</creator><creator>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creator><creator>Alakukku, Laura</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-7833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</title><author>Änäkkälä, Mikael ; Lajunen, Antti ; Hakojärvi, Mikko ; Alakukku, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aerial imaging</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>drone</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>field conditions</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>multispectral images</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Normalized difference vegetative index</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Änäkkälä, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakojärvi, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alakukku, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Änäkkälä, Mikael</au><au>Lajunen, Antti</au><au>Hakojärvi, Mikko</au><au>Alakukku, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4792</spage><pages>4792-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>Remote sensing is a method used for monitoring and measuring agricultural crop fields. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are used to effectively monitor crops via different camera technologies. Even though aerial imaging can be considered a rather straightforward process, more focus should be given to data quality and processing. This research focuses on evaluating the influences of field conditions on raw data quality and commonly used vegetation indices. The aerial images were taken with a custom-built UAV by using a multispectral camera at four different times of the day and during multiple times of the season. Measurements were carried out in the summer seasons of 2019 and 2020. The imaging data were processed with different software to calculate vegetation indices for 10 reference areas inside the fields. The results clearly show that NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) was the least affected vegetation index by the field conditions. The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined to evaluate the variations in vegetation index values within a day. Vegetation index TVI (transformed vegetation index) and NDVI had coefficient of variation values under 5%, whereas with GNDVI (green normalized difference vegetation index), the value was under 10%. Overall, the vegetation indices that include near-infrared (NIR) bands are less affected by field condition changes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs14194792</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-9852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-7833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (19), p.4792
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f707cc6d32344909b49b19e5e63cd68f
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects aerial imaging
Agricultural production
Cameras
Coefficient of variation
Crop fields
drone
Drones
Evaluation
field conditions
Influence
Machine learning
Mathematical analysis
multispectral images
Neural networks
Normalized difference vegetative index
Remote sensing
Satellites
Sensors
Software
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Variation
Vegetation
vegetation index
title Evaluation of the Influence of Field Conditions on Aerial Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Influence%20of%20Field%20Conditions%20on%20Aerial%20Multispectral%20Images%20and%20Vegetation%20Indices&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=%C3%84n%C3%A4kk%C3%A4l%C3%A4,%20Mikael&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4792&rft.pages=4792-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs14194792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2724304770%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c444a96b0f2491c5dfadbd97a9cb6844cf74fb794e67c4f0216f99acb11bd89f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724304770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true