Loading…
Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment with sandblasting and deproteinization with NaOCl on bond strength (SBS), in situ conversion degree (CD) of brackets in fluorotic enamel, and enamel etching pattern. Methods: A total of 90 non-carious maxillary premolars were used....
Saved in:
Published in: | Dental press journal of orthodontics 2020-08, Vol.25 (4), p.59-67 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83 |
container_end_page | 67 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Dental press journal of orthodontics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Huilcapi, Mariana Armas-Vega, Ana Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya Bandeca, Matheus Coelho Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Loguercio, Alessandro |
description | ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment with sandblasting and deproteinization with NaOCl on bond strength (SBS), in situ conversion degree (CD) of brackets in fluorotic enamel, and enamel etching pattern. Methods: A total of 90 non-carious maxillary premolars were used. The teeth were then assigned to six experimental groups according to: enamel surface (sound and fluorotic enamel); surface treatment (Regular etch with 37% phosphoric acid [RE]; 5.2% sodium hypochlorite + phosphoric acid [NaOCl + RE]; sandblasting + phosphoric acid [sandblasting + RE]). After storage in distilled water (37°C/24h), the specimens were tested at 1 mm/min until failure (SBS). Enamel-resin cement interfaces were evaluated for CD using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The enamel-etching pattern was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. Data from SBS and in situ CD values were analyzed using ANOVA two-away and Tukey test (α=0.05). The enamel etching pattern was evaluated only qualitatively. Results: For sound enamel, RE showed the highest SBS values, when compared to NaOCl + RE and Sandblasting + RE groups (p< 0.01). Regarding CD, only NaOCl + RE significantly compromised the mean DC, in comparison with other groups (p= 0.002). For fluorotic enamel, the Sandblasting + RE group significantly increased the mean SBS values, in comparison with RE group (p= 0.01) and no significant change was observed for CD (p> 0.52). Conclusions: The application of NaOCl or sandblasting associated to phosphoric acid improved the SBS of the brackets in fluorotic enamel without compromising the CD of the resin cement, with improving of enamel interprismatic conditioning.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade do pré-tratamento com jateamento e desproteinização com NaOCl na resistência de união (SBS), grau de conversão in situ (GC) dos braquetes metálicos ao esmalte fluorótico e o padrão de condicionamento do esmalte. Métodos: Foi utilizado um total de 90 pré-molares superiores livres de cárie. Os dentes foram divididos em seis grupos experimentais, de acordo com: superfície do esmalte (Esmalte Sadio e Fluorótico); tratamento de superfície (Condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% [ER]; Hipoclorito de sódio a 5,2% + ácido fosfórico [NaOCl + ER]; e jateamento + ácido fosfórico [Jateamento + ER]). Após armazenamento em água destilada (37oC/24 h), os espécimes foram testados a 1 mm/min até a falha (SBS). As interfaces esmalte-cimento foram avaliadas para GC usando espectr |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.059-067.oar |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7490998556146cea3a969c31a2af92f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S2176_94512020000400059</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f7490998556146cea3a969c31a2af92f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2445428075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUl1rFTEQXUSxpfY_LPriy675zsYHQUrVQsEH9TlOcie9e93dXJPdgv--2W65UAMhYeacw5nhVNVbSloqDfnAqNaN0sS0TLaiJdI0ROk2QnpRnZ-aLx__qjFC0rPqMucDKYcbIgx_XZ1xZpTkXXde_b4OAf1cx1DnJQXwWM8JYR5xmnMdp3reYw27Peb-HutjikdMc495JYw4wzD0vnYJ_B_c8GFYYopzqeIEIw5vqlcBhoyXT-9F9evL9c-rb83t9683V59vGy-pTo1ybueAOhkcgqDlcbtAmTEotBPOUO8UaAKGExpIsR86R4xzKmgWOuj4RXWz6e4iHOwx9SOkfzZCbx8LMd1ZKM79gDZoYYgxnZSKCuUROBhlPKfAIBgWila7aWXf4xDtIS5pKubtj3Wpdl0qI2zdqChXmkL4tBGOixtx58vyEgzPXDzvTP3e3sV7qyUlolsF3j8JpPh3wTzbsc8ehwEmjEu2TAgpWEe0LNB3_0FP9pg0kpfZKCuojxvKp5hzwnAyQ4ldg2TXrNg1K4VmhS1j2BKk4jXxB4THupw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595349012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huilcapi, Mariana ; Armas-Vega, Ana ; Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan ; Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues ; Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya ; Bandeca, Matheus Coelho ; Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de ; Loguercio, Alessandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Huilcapi, Mariana ; Armas-Vega, Ana ; Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan ; Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues ; Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya ; Bandeca, Matheus Coelho ; Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de ; Loguercio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment with sandblasting and deproteinization with NaOCl on bond strength (SBS), in situ conversion degree (CD) of brackets in fluorotic enamel, and enamel etching pattern. Methods: A total of 90 non-carious maxillary premolars were used. The teeth were then assigned to six experimental groups according to: enamel surface (sound and fluorotic enamel); surface treatment (Regular etch with 37% phosphoric acid [RE]; 5.2% sodium hypochlorite + phosphoric acid [NaOCl + RE]; sandblasting + phosphoric acid [sandblasting + RE]). After storage in distilled water (37°C/24h), the specimens were tested at 1 mm/min until failure (SBS). Enamel-resin cement interfaces were evaluated for CD using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The enamel-etching pattern was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. Data from SBS and in situ CD values were analyzed using ANOVA two-away and Tukey test (α=0.05). The enamel etching pattern was evaluated only qualitatively. Results: For sound enamel, RE showed the highest SBS values, when compared to NaOCl + RE and Sandblasting + RE groups (p< 0.01). Regarding CD, only NaOCl + RE significantly compromised the mean DC, in comparison with other groups (p= 0.002). For fluorotic enamel, the Sandblasting + RE group significantly increased the mean SBS values, in comparison with RE group (p= 0.01) and no significant change was observed for CD (p> 0.52). Conclusions: The application of NaOCl or sandblasting associated to phosphoric acid improved the SBS of the brackets in fluorotic enamel without compromising the CD of the resin cement, with improving of enamel interprismatic conditioning.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade do pré-tratamento com jateamento e desproteinização com NaOCl na resistência de união (SBS), grau de conversão in situ (GC) dos braquetes metálicos ao esmalte fluorótico e o padrão de condicionamento do esmalte. Métodos: Foi utilizado um total de 90 pré-molares superiores livres de cárie. Os dentes foram divididos em seis grupos experimentais, de acordo com: superfície do esmalte (Esmalte Sadio e Fluorótico); tratamento de superfície (Condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% [ER]; Hipoclorito de sódio a 5,2% + ácido fosfórico [NaOCl + ER]; e jateamento + ácido fosfórico [Jateamento + ER]). Após armazenamento em água destilada (37oC/24 h), os espécimes foram testados a 1 mm/min até a falha (SBS). As interfaces esmalte-cimento foram avaliadas para GC usando espectroscopia micro-Raman. O padrão do condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Os dados da SBS e GC foram analisados utilizando ANOVA dois fatores e teste de Tukey (α= 0,05). O padrão de condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado apenas qualitativamente. Resultados: Para o esmalte sadio, o ER apresentou os maiores valores de SBS, quando comparado aos grupos NaOCl + ER e Jateamento + ER (p< 0,01). Em relação ao GC, apenas a média do grupo NaOCl + ER foi comprometida significativamente em comparação aos outros grupos (p= 0,002). Para o esmalte fluorótico, Jateamento + ER aumentou significativamente a média dos valores de SBS, em comparação com o grupo ER (p= 0,01) e nenhuma mudança significativa foi observada no GC (p> 0,52). Conclusões: A aplicação de NaOCl ou jateamento associado ao ácido fosfórico melhorou a SBS dos braquetes no esmalte fluorótico sem comprometer o GC do cimento resinoso, com a melhoria do condicionamento interprismático do esmalte.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2176-9451</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2177-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.059-067.oar</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32965388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maringa: Dental Press International</publisher><subject>Acids ; Adhesives ; Bond strength ; Cement ; Conversion degree ; Dental fluorosis ; Dentistry ; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE ; Enamel ; Light ; Orthodontics ; Sodium hypochlorite ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2020-08, Vol.25 (4), p.59-67</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8492-8348 ; 0000-0001-5068-0284 ; 0000-0001-9880-4856 ; 0000-0002-1079-3476 ; 0000-0002-8099-8821 ; 0000-0003-3800-8166 ; 0000-0002-7434-3327 ; 0000-0003-1484-8136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2595349012/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2595349012?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,24150,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huilcapi, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armas-Vega, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeca, Matheus Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel</title><title>Dental press journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Dental Press J. Orthod</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment with sandblasting and deproteinization with NaOCl on bond strength (SBS), in situ conversion degree (CD) of brackets in fluorotic enamel, and enamel etching pattern. Methods: A total of 90 non-carious maxillary premolars were used. The teeth were then assigned to six experimental groups according to: enamel surface (sound and fluorotic enamel); surface treatment (Regular etch with 37% phosphoric acid [RE]; 5.2% sodium hypochlorite + phosphoric acid [NaOCl + RE]; sandblasting + phosphoric acid [sandblasting + RE]). After storage in distilled water (37°C/24h), the specimens were tested at 1 mm/min until failure (SBS). Enamel-resin cement interfaces were evaluated for CD using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The enamel-etching pattern was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. Data from SBS and in situ CD values were analyzed using ANOVA two-away and Tukey test (α=0.05). The enamel etching pattern was evaluated only qualitatively. Results: For sound enamel, RE showed the highest SBS values, when compared to NaOCl + RE and Sandblasting + RE groups (p< 0.01). Regarding CD, only NaOCl + RE significantly compromised the mean DC, in comparison with other groups (p= 0.002). For fluorotic enamel, the Sandblasting + RE group significantly increased the mean SBS values, in comparison with RE group (p= 0.01) and no significant change was observed for CD (p> 0.52). Conclusions: The application of NaOCl or sandblasting associated to phosphoric acid improved the SBS of the brackets in fluorotic enamel without compromising the CD of the resin cement, with improving of enamel interprismatic conditioning.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade do pré-tratamento com jateamento e desproteinização com NaOCl na resistência de união (SBS), grau de conversão in situ (GC) dos braquetes metálicos ao esmalte fluorótico e o padrão de condicionamento do esmalte. Métodos: Foi utilizado um total de 90 pré-molares superiores livres de cárie. Os dentes foram divididos em seis grupos experimentais, de acordo com: superfície do esmalte (Esmalte Sadio e Fluorótico); tratamento de superfície (Condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% [ER]; Hipoclorito de sódio a 5,2% + ácido fosfórico [NaOCl + ER]; e jateamento + ácido fosfórico [Jateamento + ER]). Após armazenamento em água destilada (37oC/24 h), os espécimes foram testados a 1 mm/min até a falha (SBS). As interfaces esmalte-cimento foram avaliadas para GC usando espectroscopia micro-Raman. O padrão do condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Os dados da SBS e GC foram analisados utilizando ANOVA dois fatores e teste de Tukey (α= 0,05). O padrão de condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado apenas qualitativamente. Resultados: Para o esmalte sadio, o ER apresentou os maiores valores de SBS, quando comparado aos grupos NaOCl + ER e Jateamento + ER (p< 0,01). Em relação ao GC, apenas a média do grupo NaOCl + ER foi comprometida significativamente em comparação aos outros grupos (p= 0,002). Para o esmalte fluorótico, Jateamento + ER aumentou significativamente a média dos valores de SBS, em comparação com o grupo ER (p= 0,01) e nenhuma mudança significativa foi observada no GC (p> 0,52). Conclusões: A aplicação de NaOCl ou jateamento associado ao ácido fosfórico melhorou a SBS dos braquetes no esmalte fluorótico sem comprometer o GC do cimento resinoso, com a melhoria do condicionamento interprismático do esmalte.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Conversion degree</subject><subject>Dental fluorosis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Sodium hypochlorite</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUl1rFTEQXUSxpfY_LPriy675zsYHQUrVQsEH9TlOcie9e93dXJPdgv--2W65UAMhYeacw5nhVNVbSloqDfnAqNaN0sS0TLaiJdI0ROk2QnpRnZ-aLx__qjFC0rPqMucDKYcbIgx_XZ1xZpTkXXde_b4OAf1cx1DnJQXwWM8JYR5xmnMdp3reYw27Peb-HutjikdMc495JYw4wzD0vnYJ_B_c8GFYYopzqeIEIw5vqlcBhoyXT-9F9evL9c-rb83t9683V59vGy-pTo1ybueAOhkcgqDlcbtAmTEotBPOUO8UaAKGExpIsR86R4xzKmgWOuj4RXWz6e4iHOwx9SOkfzZCbx8LMd1ZKM79gDZoYYgxnZSKCuUROBhlPKfAIBgWila7aWXf4xDtIS5pKubtj3Wpdl0qI2zdqChXmkL4tBGOixtx58vyEgzPXDzvTP3e3sV7qyUlolsF3j8JpPh3wTzbsc8ehwEmjEu2TAgpWEe0LNB3_0FP9pg0kpfZKCuojxvKp5hzwnAyQ4ldg2TXrNg1K4VmhS1j2BKk4jXxB4THupw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Huilcapi, Mariana</creator><creator>Armas-Vega, Ana</creator><creator>Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan</creator><creator>Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues</creator><creator>Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya</creator><creator>Bandeca, Matheus Coelho</creator><creator>Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de</creator><creator>Loguercio, Alessandro</creator><general>Dental Press International</general><general>Dental Press Editora</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-8348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-8821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3800-8166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-3327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-8136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel</title><author>Huilcapi, Mariana ; Armas-Vega, Ana ; Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan ; Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues ; Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya ; Bandeca, Matheus Coelho ; Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de ; Loguercio, Alessandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Conversion degree</topic><topic>Dental fluorosis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Sodium hypochlorite</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huilcapi, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armas-Vega, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandeca, Matheus Coelho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huilcapi, Mariana</au><au>Armas-Vega, Ana</au><au>Cardenas, Andres Felipe Millan</au><au>Araujo, Lucila Cristina Rodrigues</au><au>Ocampo, Jessica Bedoya</au><au>Bandeca, Matheus Coelho</au><au>Siqueira, Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de</au><au>Loguercio, Alessandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel</atitle><jtitle>Dental press journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Dental Press J. Orthod</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>2176-9451</issn><issn>2177-6709</issn><eissn>2177-6709</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the pretreatment with sandblasting and deproteinization with NaOCl on bond strength (SBS), in situ conversion degree (CD) of brackets in fluorotic enamel, and enamel etching pattern. Methods: A total of 90 non-carious maxillary premolars were used. The teeth were then assigned to six experimental groups according to: enamel surface (sound and fluorotic enamel); surface treatment (Regular etch with 37% phosphoric acid [RE]; 5.2% sodium hypochlorite + phosphoric acid [NaOCl + RE]; sandblasting + phosphoric acid [sandblasting + RE]). After storage in distilled water (37°C/24h), the specimens were tested at 1 mm/min until failure (SBS). Enamel-resin cement interfaces were evaluated for CD using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The enamel-etching pattern was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. Data from SBS and in situ CD values were analyzed using ANOVA two-away and Tukey test (α=0.05). The enamel etching pattern was evaluated only qualitatively. Results: For sound enamel, RE showed the highest SBS values, when compared to NaOCl + RE and Sandblasting + RE groups (p< 0.01). Regarding CD, only NaOCl + RE significantly compromised the mean DC, in comparison with other groups (p= 0.002). For fluorotic enamel, the Sandblasting + RE group significantly increased the mean SBS values, in comparison with RE group (p= 0.01) and no significant change was observed for CD (p> 0.52). Conclusions: The application of NaOCl or sandblasting associated to phosphoric acid improved the SBS of the brackets in fluorotic enamel without compromising the CD of the resin cement, with improving of enamel interprismatic conditioning.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade do pré-tratamento com jateamento e desproteinização com NaOCl na resistência de união (SBS), grau de conversão in situ (GC) dos braquetes metálicos ao esmalte fluorótico e o padrão de condicionamento do esmalte. Métodos: Foi utilizado um total de 90 pré-molares superiores livres de cárie. Os dentes foram divididos em seis grupos experimentais, de acordo com: superfície do esmalte (Esmalte Sadio e Fluorótico); tratamento de superfície (Condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% [ER]; Hipoclorito de sódio a 5,2% + ácido fosfórico [NaOCl + ER]; e jateamento + ácido fosfórico [Jateamento + ER]). Após armazenamento em água destilada (37oC/24 h), os espécimes foram testados a 1 mm/min até a falha (SBS). As interfaces esmalte-cimento foram avaliadas para GC usando espectroscopia micro-Raman. O padrão do condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado sob microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Os dados da SBS e GC foram analisados utilizando ANOVA dois fatores e teste de Tukey (α= 0,05). O padrão de condicionamento do esmalte foi avaliado apenas qualitativamente. Resultados: Para o esmalte sadio, o ER apresentou os maiores valores de SBS, quando comparado aos grupos NaOCl + ER e Jateamento + ER (p< 0,01). Em relação ao GC, apenas a média do grupo NaOCl + ER foi comprometida significativamente em comparação aos outros grupos (p= 0,002). Para o esmalte fluorótico, Jateamento + ER aumentou significativamente a média dos valores de SBS, em comparação com o grupo ER (p= 0,01) e nenhuma mudança significativa foi observada no GC (p> 0,52). Conclusões: A aplicação de NaOCl ou jateamento associado ao ácido fosfórico melhorou a SBS dos braquetes no esmalte fluorótico sem comprometer o GC do cimento resinoso, com a melhoria do condicionamento interprismático do esmalte.</abstract><cop>Maringa</cop><pub>Dental Press International</pub><pmid>32965388</pmid><doi>10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.059-067.oar</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-8348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-8821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3800-8166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-3327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-8136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2176-9451 |
ispartof | Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2020-08, Vol.25 (4), p.59-67 |
issn | 2176-9451 2177-6709 2177-6709 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7490998556146cea3a969c31a2af92f |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; SciELO; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acids Adhesives Bond strength Cement Conversion degree Dental fluorosis Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Enamel Light Orthodontics Sodium hypochlorite Teeth |
title | Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A00%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20surface%20treatments%20on%20the%20adhesive%20properties%20of%20metallic%20brackets%20on%20fluorotic%20enamel&rft.jtitle=Dental%20press%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Huilcapi,%20Mariana&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=2176-9451&rft.eissn=2177-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.059-067.oar&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2445428075%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517r-6bbdba1b5fbea415fbbdf1299e47b4b91cb6a70a9301f0296f8b09bb6f72f8a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595349012&rft_id=info:pmid/32965388&rft_scielo_id=S2176_94512020000400059&rfr_iscdi=true |