Loading…
Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults
ObjectiveTo assess public perceptions of the effectiveness of e-cigarette regulations in minimising use among adolescents and those who have never smoked. Specifically, we explored (1) perceived effectiveness of current regulations relating to e-cigarettes and (2) ideas for further regulations that...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2024-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e081032-e081032 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-6376b772a1840518ed79c2c09b52837ccd99bc70a8cf9c61a67190ae93e98a713 |
container_end_page | e081032 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e081032 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Brierley, Mary-Ellen E Yaw, Sean J L Jongenelis, Michelle I |
description | ObjectiveTo assess public perceptions of the effectiveness of e-cigarette regulations in minimising use among adolescents and those who have never smoked. Specifically, we explored (1) perceived effectiveness of current regulations relating to e-cigarettes and (2) ideas for further regulations that could reduce use.Design and participantsFocus groups (n=16) were conducted with Australian adolescents (14–17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults (25–39 years). Groups were stratified by age, gender and e-cigarette use status. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFocus groups were conducted in-person in two major Australian cities.ResultsGroups lacked a comprehensive understanding of e-cigarette regulations in Australia. When informed of these regulations, half of the groups considered the prescription model for nicotine e-cigarette products to be effective when enforced appropriately. Almost all groups considered access to non-nicotine products problematic. All groups suggested a range of demand reduction regulations, including plain packaging, health warnings, flavour restrictions and increased vape-free areas. Most groups (predominantly those who had never vaped) also recommended supply reduction regulations such as banning all e-cigarettes. The need for supply reduction measures to include addiction and mental health supports was discussed.ConclusionsThe regulations recommended by participants largely align with those that are to be introduced in Australia, indicating that these reforms are likely to be accepted by the public. Ensuring these reforms are complemented by formal supports for young people experiencing nicotine dependence and related mental health concerns is critical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081032 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f782313fad2c4b5f8f2ca2321f69b0e9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f782313fad2c4b5f8f2ca2321f69b0e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2922241888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-6376b772a1840518ed79c2c09b52837ccd99bc70a8cf9c61a67190ae93e98a713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEotWhT4CEIrFhE-pL4gsbVFVcKlWCBaytiS-HHCXxqS-VumPNG_B6PAlOcygtC7yxx_7mH3v8V9VzjF5jTNlpP-383s4NQYQ2SGBEyaPqmKC2bRjqusf31kfVSYw7VEbbya4jT6sjKihmnWTH1Y_PNmi7T4OfY-1dfZZjCjAO8Ov7z1jbRg9bCDYlWwe7zSOsIMymxNpPk53NYc_5ULuccljQEkzxTQ31VS5iqSDXto4pm5ulCBg_2qjtnFYpMHlM8Vn1xMEY7clh3lRf37_7cv6xufz04eL87LLpW4lSwyhnPecEsGhRh4U1XGqikew7IijX2kjZa45AaCc1w8A4lgispFYK4JhuqotV13jYqX0YJgg3ysOgbjd82CoIadCjVY4LQjF1YIhu-84JRzQQSrBjskdFclO9XbX2uZ-sWZ5UuvdA9OHJPHxTW3-tMBKs_Mhym1cHheCvso1JTUNpzTjCbH2OikhCZCu4WIq9_Afd-Rzm0qtbirRYCFEoulI6-BjLV9zdBiO1eEcdvKMW76jVOyXrxf2H3OX8cUoBTlegZP-t-z_J3-zN1EI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922241888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>BMJ journals single titles</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E ; Yaw, Sean J L ; Jongenelis, Michelle I</creator><creatorcontrib>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E ; Yaw, Sean J L ; Jongenelis, Michelle I</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo assess public perceptions of the effectiveness of e-cigarette regulations in minimising use among adolescents and those who have never smoked. Specifically, we explored (1) perceived effectiveness of current regulations relating to e-cigarettes and (2) ideas for further regulations that could reduce use.Design and participantsFocus groups (n=16) were conducted with Australian adolescents (14–17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults (25–39 years). Groups were stratified by age, gender and e-cigarette use status. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFocus groups were conducted in-person in two major Australian cities.ResultsGroups lacked a comprehensive understanding of e-cigarette regulations in Australia. When informed of these regulations, half of the groups considered the prescription model for nicotine e-cigarette products to be effective when enforced appropriately. Almost all groups considered access to non-nicotine products problematic. All groups suggested a range of demand reduction regulations, including plain packaging, health warnings, flavour restrictions and increased vape-free areas. Most groups (predominantly those who had never vaped) also recommended supply reduction regulations such as banning all e-cigarettes. The need for supply reduction measures to include addiction and mental health supports was discussed.ConclusionsThe regulations recommended by participants largely align with those that are to be introduced in Australia, indicating that these reforms are likely to be accepted by the public. Ensuring these reforms are complemented by formal supports for young people experiencing nicotine dependence and related mental health concerns is critical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38316596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Age ; Australia ; Caregivers ; Electronic cigarettes ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ; Focus groups ; Gender ; Health policy ; Humans ; Nicotine ; Perceptions ; Public Health ; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ; Regulation ; Smoking ; Teenagers ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Products ; Tobacco Use Disorder ; Vaping ; Women ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2024-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e081032-e081032</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-6376b772a1840518ed79c2c09b52837ccd99bc70a8cf9c61a67190ae93e98a713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0717-1692 ; 0000-0003-1732-2260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2922241888/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2922241888?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3194,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,55341,55350,75126,77596,77597,77660,77686</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38316596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaw, Sean J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jongenelis, Michelle I</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo assess public perceptions of the effectiveness of e-cigarette regulations in minimising use among adolescents and those who have never smoked. Specifically, we explored (1) perceived effectiveness of current regulations relating to e-cigarettes and (2) ideas for further regulations that could reduce use.Design and participantsFocus groups (n=16) were conducted with Australian adolescents (14–17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults (25–39 years). Groups were stratified by age, gender and e-cigarette use status. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFocus groups were conducted in-person in two major Australian cities.ResultsGroups lacked a comprehensive understanding of e-cigarette regulations in Australia. When informed of these regulations, half of the groups considered the prescription model for nicotine e-cigarette products to be effective when enforced appropriately. Almost all groups considered access to non-nicotine products problematic. All groups suggested a range of demand reduction regulations, including plain packaging, health warnings, flavour restrictions and increased vape-free areas. Most groups (predominantly those who had never vaped) also recommended supply reduction regulations such as banning all e-cigarettes. The need for supply reduction measures to include addiction and mental health supports was discussed.ConclusionsThe regulations recommended by participants largely align with those that are to be introduced in Australia, indicating that these reforms are likely to be accepted by the public. Ensuring these reforms are complemented by formal supports for young people experiencing nicotine dependence and related mental health concerns is critical.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Electronic cigarettes</subject><subject>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>QUALITATIVE RESEARCH</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Products</subject><subject>Tobacco Use Disorder</subject><subject>Vaping</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEotWhT4CEIrFhE-pL4gsbVFVcKlWCBaytiS-HHCXxqS-VumPNG_B6PAlOcygtC7yxx_7mH3v8V9VzjF5jTNlpP-383s4NQYQ2SGBEyaPqmKC2bRjqusf31kfVSYw7VEbbya4jT6sjKihmnWTH1Y_PNmi7T4OfY-1dfZZjCjAO8Ov7z1jbRg9bCDYlWwe7zSOsIMymxNpPk53NYc_5ULuccljQEkzxTQ31VS5iqSDXto4pm5ulCBg_2qjtnFYpMHlM8Vn1xMEY7clh3lRf37_7cv6xufz04eL87LLpW4lSwyhnPecEsGhRh4U1XGqikew7IijX2kjZa45AaCc1w8A4lgispFYK4JhuqotV13jYqX0YJgg3ysOgbjd82CoIadCjVY4LQjF1YIhu-84JRzQQSrBjskdFclO9XbX2uZ-sWZ5UuvdA9OHJPHxTW3-tMBKs_Mhym1cHheCvso1JTUNpzTjCbH2OikhCZCu4WIq9_Afd-Rzm0qtbirRYCFEoulI6-BjLV9zdBiO1eEcdvKMW76jVOyXrxf2H3OX8cUoBTlegZP-t-z_J3-zN1EI</recordid><startdate>20240205</startdate><enddate>20240205</enddate><creator>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E</creator><creator>Yaw, Sean J L</creator><creator>Jongenelis, Michelle I</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-1692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-2260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240205</creationdate><title>Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults</title><author>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E ; Yaw, Sean J L ; Jongenelis, Michelle I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-6376b772a1840518ed79c2c09b52837ccd99bc70a8cf9c61a67190ae93e98a713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Electronic cigarettes</topic><topic>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>QUALITATIVE RESEARCH</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Products</topic><topic>Tobacco Use Disorder</topic><topic>Vaping</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaw, Sean J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jongenelis, Michelle I</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brierley, Mary-Ellen E</au><au>Yaw, Sean J L</au><au>Jongenelis, Michelle I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open</stitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2024-02-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e081032</spage><epage>e081032</epage><pages>e081032-e081032</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo assess public perceptions of the effectiveness of e-cigarette regulations in minimising use among adolescents and those who have never smoked. Specifically, we explored (1) perceived effectiveness of current regulations relating to e-cigarettes and (2) ideas for further regulations that could reduce use.Design and participantsFocus groups (n=16) were conducted with Australian adolescents (14–17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults (25–39 years). Groups were stratified by age, gender and e-cigarette use status. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFocus groups were conducted in-person in two major Australian cities.ResultsGroups lacked a comprehensive understanding of e-cigarette regulations in Australia. When informed of these regulations, half of the groups considered the prescription model for nicotine e-cigarette products to be effective when enforced appropriately. Almost all groups considered access to non-nicotine products problematic. All groups suggested a range of demand reduction regulations, including plain packaging, health warnings, flavour restrictions and increased vape-free areas. Most groups (predominantly those who had never vaped) also recommended supply reduction regulations such as banning all e-cigarettes. The need for supply reduction measures to include addiction and mental health supports was discussed.ConclusionsThe regulations recommended by participants largely align with those that are to be introduced in Australia, indicating that these reforms are likely to be accepted by the public. Ensuring these reforms are complemented by formal supports for young people experiencing nicotine dependence and related mental health concerns is critical.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>38316596</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081032</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-1692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-2260</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2024-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e081032-e081032 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f782313fad2c4b5f8f2ca2321f69b0e9 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; BMJ journals single titles; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Age Australia Caregivers Electronic cigarettes Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Focus groups Gender Health policy Humans Nicotine Perceptions Public Health QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Regulation Smoking Teenagers Tobacco Tobacco Products Tobacco Use Disorder Vaping Women Young Adult Young adults |
title | Perceptions of Australia’s e-cigarette regulations and recommendations for future reforms: a qualitative study of adolescents and adults |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A58%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20Australia%E2%80%99s%20e-cigarette%20regulations%20and%20recommendations%20for%20future%20reforms:%20a%20qualitative%20study%20of%20adolescents%20and%20adults&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Brierley,%20Mary-Ellen%20E&rft.date=2024-02-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e081032&rft.epage=e081032&rft.pages=e081032-e081032&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2922241888%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-6376b772a1840518ed79c2c09b52837ccd99bc70a8cf9c61a67190ae93e98a713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922241888&rft_id=info:pmid/38316596&rfr_iscdi=true |