Loading…

A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms

Lack of cost information is a barrier to acceptance of 3D woven preforms as reinforcements for composite materials, compared with 2D preforms. A parametric, resource-based technical cost model (TCM) was developed for 3D woven preforms based on a novel relationship equating manufacturing time and 3D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of composites science 2022-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18
Main Authors: Clarke, James, McIlhagger, Alistair, Dixon, Dorian, Archer, Edward, Stewart, Glenda, Brelsford, Roy, Summerscales, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Journal of composites science
container_volume 6
creator Clarke, James
McIlhagger, Alistair
Dixon, Dorian
Archer, Edward
Stewart, Glenda
Brelsford, Roy
Summerscales, John
description Lack of cost information is a barrier to acceptance of 3D woven preforms as reinforcements for composite materials, compared with 2D preforms. A parametric, resource-based technical cost model (TCM) was developed for 3D woven preforms based on a novel relationship equating manufacturing time and 3D preform complexity. Manufacturing time, and therefore cost, was found to scale with complexity for seventeen bespoke manufactured 3D preforms. Two sub-models were derived for a Weavebird loom and a Jacquard loom. For each loom, there was a strong correlation between preform complexity and manufacturing time. For a large, highly complex preform, the Jacquard loom is more efficient, so preform cost will be much lower than for the Weavebird. Provided production is continuous, learning, either by human agency or an autonomous loom control algorithm, can reduce preform cost for one or both looms to a commercially acceptable level. The TCM cost model framework could incorporate appropriate learning curves with digital twin/multi-variate analysis so that cost per preform of bespoke 3D woven fabrics for customised products with low production rates may be predicted with greater accuracy. A more accurate model could highlight resources such as tooling, labour and material for targeted cost reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcs6010018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7c17911b28c4ba1925c9fc346a21009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f7c17911b28c4ba1925c9fc346a21009</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2621297842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGo3_oJBd8Lozc1rsiz1VajoQtFdSDOJdGibmkwF_73Rirq6Dw7fPfcQckzhnDENF53LEigAbfbIAAXwmiv1sv-vPySjnDsAQKU5aDYgJ-NqEnNf3cXWL6sQU8Uuq-f47tfVQ_JlXuUjchDsMvvRTx2Sp-urx8ltPbu_mU7Gs9oxSfuaN5yJNsy1dQjUOaetB9AiSK6kkkE16FohJdVoBVD0DTKU3jOlGgkg2JBMd9w22s5s0mJl04eJdmG-FzG9Gpv6hVt6E5SjSlM6x8bxuS1I4XRwjEuLJQBdWKc71ibFt63PveniNq2LfYMSKWrVcCyqs53KpZhzeff3KgXzFan5i5R9Aut4Y8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621297842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Clarke, James ; McIlhagger, Alistair ; Dixon, Dorian ; Archer, Edward ; Stewart, Glenda ; Brelsford, Roy ; Summerscales, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, James ; McIlhagger, Alistair ; Dixon, Dorian ; Archer, Edward ; Stewart, Glenda ; Brelsford, Roy ; Summerscales, John</creatorcontrib><description>Lack of cost information is a barrier to acceptance of 3D woven preforms as reinforcements for composite materials, compared with 2D preforms. A parametric, resource-based technical cost model (TCM) was developed for 3D woven preforms based on a novel relationship equating manufacturing time and 3D preform complexity. Manufacturing time, and therefore cost, was found to scale with complexity for seventeen bespoke manufactured 3D preforms. Two sub-models were derived for a Weavebird loom and a Jacquard loom. For each loom, there was a strong correlation between preform complexity and manufacturing time. For a large, highly complex preform, the Jacquard loom is more efficient, so preform cost will be much lower than for the Weavebird. Provided production is continuous, learning, either by human agency or an autonomous loom control algorithm, can reduce preform cost for one or both looms to a commercially acceptable level. The TCM cost model framework could incorporate appropriate learning curves with digital twin/multi-variate analysis so that cost per preform of bespoke 3D woven fabrics for customised products with low production rates may be predicted with greater accuracy. A more accurate model could highlight resources such as tooling, labour and material for targeted cost reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2504-477X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2504-477X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcs6010018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>3D woven fabrics ; Aeronautics ; Algorithms ; Capital costs ; Complexity ; Composite materials ; Control algorithms ; Control theory ; Cost analysis ; cost model ; Customization ; Design ; learning ; Learning curves ; Machine learning ; Manufacturing ; preform ; Preforms ; Textiles ; Three dimensional models ; Tooling ; Two dimensional models ; Weavebird ; Weaving</subject><ispartof>Journal of composites science, 2022-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1017-1500 ; 0000-0002-3557-0404</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621297842/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621297842?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIlhagger, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Dorian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Glenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brelsford, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerscales, John</creatorcontrib><title>A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms</title><title>Journal of composites science</title><description>Lack of cost information is a barrier to acceptance of 3D woven preforms as reinforcements for composite materials, compared with 2D preforms. A parametric, resource-based technical cost model (TCM) was developed for 3D woven preforms based on a novel relationship equating manufacturing time and 3D preform complexity. Manufacturing time, and therefore cost, was found to scale with complexity for seventeen bespoke manufactured 3D preforms. Two sub-models were derived for a Weavebird loom and a Jacquard loom. For each loom, there was a strong correlation between preform complexity and manufacturing time. For a large, highly complex preform, the Jacquard loom is more efficient, so preform cost will be much lower than for the Weavebird. Provided production is continuous, learning, either by human agency or an autonomous loom control algorithm, can reduce preform cost for one or both looms to a commercially acceptable level. The TCM cost model framework could incorporate appropriate learning curves with digital twin/multi-variate analysis so that cost per preform of bespoke 3D woven fabrics for customised products with low production rates may be predicted with greater accuracy. A more accurate model could highlight resources such as tooling, labour and material for targeted cost reduction.</description><subject>3D woven fabrics</subject><subject>Aeronautics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Control algorithms</subject><subject>Control theory</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>cost model</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>learning</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>preform</subject><subject>Preforms</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Tooling</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><subject>Weavebird</subject><subject>Weaving</subject><issn>2504-477X</issn><issn>2504-477X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGo3_oJBd8Lozc1rsiz1VajoQtFdSDOJdGibmkwF_73Rirq6Dw7fPfcQckzhnDENF53LEigAbfbIAAXwmiv1sv-vPySjnDsAQKU5aDYgJ-NqEnNf3cXWL6sQU8Uuq-f47tfVQ_JlXuUjchDsMvvRTx2Sp-urx8ltPbu_mU7Gs9oxSfuaN5yJNsy1dQjUOaetB9AiSK6kkkE16FohJdVoBVD0DTKU3jOlGgkg2JBMd9w22s5s0mJl04eJdmG-FzG9Gpv6hVt6E5SjSlM6x8bxuS1I4XRwjEuLJQBdWKc71ibFt63PveniNq2LfYMSKWrVcCyqs53KpZhzeff3KgXzFan5i5R9Aut4Y8s</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Clarke, James</creator><creator>McIlhagger, Alistair</creator><creator>Dixon, Dorian</creator><creator>Archer, Edward</creator><creator>Stewart, Glenda</creator><creator>Brelsford, Roy</creator><creator>Summerscales, John</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-1500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-0404</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms</title><author>Clarke, James ; McIlhagger, Alistair ; Dixon, Dorian ; Archer, Edward ; Stewart, Glenda ; Brelsford, Roy ; Summerscales, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>3D woven fabrics</topic><topic>Aeronautics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Control algorithms</topic><topic>Control theory</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>cost model</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>learning</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>preform</topic><topic>Preforms</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Tooling</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><topic>Weavebird</topic><topic>Weaving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIlhagger, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Dorian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Glenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brelsford, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerscales, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of composites science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, James</au><au>McIlhagger, Alistair</au><au>Dixon, Dorian</au><au>Archer, Edward</au><au>Stewart, Glenda</au><au>Brelsford, Roy</au><au>Summerscales, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of composites science</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><pages>18-</pages><issn>2504-477X</issn><eissn>2504-477X</eissn><abstract>Lack of cost information is a barrier to acceptance of 3D woven preforms as reinforcements for composite materials, compared with 2D preforms. A parametric, resource-based technical cost model (TCM) was developed for 3D woven preforms based on a novel relationship equating manufacturing time and 3D preform complexity. Manufacturing time, and therefore cost, was found to scale with complexity for seventeen bespoke manufactured 3D preforms. Two sub-models were derived for a Weavebird loom and a Jacquard loom. For each loom, there was a strong correlation between preform complexity and manufacturing time. For a large, highly complex preform, the Jacquard loom is more efficient, so preform cost will be much lower than for the Weavebird. Provided production is continuous, learning, either by human agency or an autonomous loom control algorithm, can reduce preform cost for one or both looms to a commercially acceptable level. The TCM cost model framework could incorporate appropriate learning curves with digital twin/multi-variate analysis so that cost per preform of bespoke 3D woven fabrics for customised products with low production rates may be predicted with greater accuracy. A more accurate model could highlight resources such as tooling, labour and material for targeted cost reduction.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jcs6010018</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-1500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-0404</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2504-477X
ispartof Journal of composites science, 2022-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18
issn 2504-477X
2504-477X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7c17911b28c4ba1925c9fc346a21009
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects 3D woven fabrics
Aeronautics
Algorithms
Capital costs
Complexity
Composite materials
Control algorithms
Control theory
Cost analysis
cost model
Customization
Design
learning
Learning curves
Machine learning
Manufacturing
preform
Preforms
Textiles
Three dimensional models
Tooling
Two dimensional models
Weavebird
Weaving
title A Cost Model for 3D Woven Preforms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cost%20Model%20for%203D%20Woven%20Preforms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20composites%20science&rft.au=Clarke,%20James&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.pages=18-&rft.issn=2504-477X&rft.eissn=2504-477X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcs6010018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2621297842%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-48435dfb9ac201ccc9ae0095f647676f782cd566192a5012e82326ee377860053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621297842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true