Loading…

Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework

Due to theoretical shortcomings, most of the literature that examines the impact of religion on economic well-being fails to distinguish between the religion and the religion constituents. Moreover, the current framework has a narrow focus on economic well-being, does not facilitate for empirical te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Humanities & social sciences communications 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.241-15, Article 241
Main Author: Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 241
container_title Humanities & social sciences communications
container_volume 10
creator Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq
description Due to theoretical shortcomings, most of the literature that examines the impact of religion on economic well-being fails to distinguish between the religion and the religion constituents. Moreover, the current framework has a narrow focus on economic well-being, does not facilitate for empirical testing, and is troubled by the problem of endogeneity. This paper introduces a framework for the empirical and descriptive study of the impact of religion on socio-economic development. The framework introduced facilitates for the adoption of both inductive and deductive approaches, allowing one to operationalize and analyze the religion itself, to test whether it embodies any principles that might hinder development by facilitating for the construction of a quantitative measure, which seeks to differentiate between the religion and the behavior of its constituents, as well as facilitate for a descriptive study of the religion itself. An example of how to utilize the framework developed is provided for the case of Islam, where the concept of Mafsada, public harm, in the Maqasid of Shariah, the purpose of Islamic jurisprudence, is operationalized, alongside Adam Smith’s Worthless Fellow in the Theory of Moral Sentiments, to develop a composite measure whose corollaries represent behavior a worthless fellow might engage in and would subsequently lead to societal harm. These corollaries can also be adopted in an empirical study as independent variables. Moreover, Ibn Khuldon’s Theory of Development is also utilized along with Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic to facilitate for the study as to why Muslim countries are underdeveloped, and whether their poor development is attributable to Islam, or due to factors relating to culture, justice, politics, and others. This study utilizes a causal research design as it facilitates for better understanding the nature and the extent of the relationship between variables in poorly understood phenomena—behavior, religion, and how, and whether, they can impact development.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41599-023-01702-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7cd15cbfe734ab296de2c543f3f6161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f7cd15cbfe734ab296de2c543f3f6161</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2813782137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhYMoKLV_wNWAW0fznsSdio-C4EZxGTLJTU2dTmoyVuqvd7Qibu49XA7nHvgQOiL4lGDRnBVOhNY1pqzGpMG0JjvogEpJa6013f2n99G0lAXGmApCOVUH6PkSXuw6pnxSZejiPKb-pLK9r0pyMdXgUp-W0VUe1tCl1RL64byyVdn0wwuU-Am-GkXKMERnuypku4SPlF8P0V6wXYHp756gp5vrx6u7-v7hdnZ1cV87psRQc4FxE4TUQSkvWqdbKqxzvmGaQKMU4zxQDt5LpzgFzDUo1noQ3jIbpGQTNNvm-mQXZpXj0uaNSTaan0PKc2Pz2K0DExrniXBtgIZx21ItPVAnOAssSCLJmHW8zVrl9PYOZTCL9J77sb6hirBG0XGMLrp1uZxKyRD-vhJsvnmYLQ8z8jA_PAxhXy6TfkU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2813782137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</creatorcontrib><description>Due to theoretical shortcomings, most of the literature that examines the impact of religion on economic well-being fails to distinguish between the religion and the religion constituents. Moreover, the current framework has a narrow focus on economic well-being, does not facilitate for empirical testing, and is troubled by the problem of endogeneity. This paper introduces a framework for the empirical and descriptive study of the impact of religion on socio-economic development. The framework introduced facilitates for the adoption of both inductive and deductive approaches, allowing one to operationalize and analyze the religion itself, to test whether it embodies any principles that might hinder development by facilitating for the construction of a quantitative measure, which seeks to differentiate between the religion and the behavior of its constituents, as well as facilitate for a descriptive study of the religion itself. An example of how to utilize the framework developed is provided for the case of Islam, where the concept of Mafsada, public harm, in the Maqasid of Shariah, the purpose of Islamic jurisprudence, is operationalized, alongside Adam Smith’s Worthless Fellow in the Theory of Moral Sentiments, to develop a composite measure whose corollaries represent behavior a worthless fellow might engage in and would subsequently lead to societal harm. These corollaries can also be adopted in an empirical study as independent variables. Moreover, Ibn Khuldon’s Theory of Development is also utilized along with Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic to facilitate for the study as to why Muslim countries are underdeveloped, and whether their poor development is attributable to Islam, or due to factors relating to culture, justice, politics, and others. This study utilizes a causal research design as it facilitates for better understanding the nature and the extent of the relationship between variables in poorly understood phenomena—behavior, religion, and how, and whether, they can impact development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-9992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-9992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01702-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Capitalism ; Cultural change ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic theory ; Economic well being ; Hypotheses ; Independent variables ; Islam ; Jurisprudence ; LDCs ; Measures ; Protestant ethic ; Protestant Reformation ; Protestantism ; Religion ; Research design ; Sociocultural factors ; Socioeconomic development ; Variables ; Weber, Max (1864-1920) ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Humanities &amp; social sciences communications, 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.241-15, Article 241</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7730-0074</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2813782137/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2813782137?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,25731,27321,27901,27902,33588,33751,36989,43709,44566,73964,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework</title><title>Humanities &amp; social sciences communications</title><description>Due to theoretical shortcomings, most of the literature that examines the impact of religion on economic well-being fails to distinguish between the religion and the religion constituents. Moreover, the current framework has a narrow focus on economic well-being, does not facilitate for empirical testing, and is troubled by the problem of endogeneity. This paper introduces a framework for the empirical and descriptive study of the impact of religion on socio-economic development. The framework introduced facilitates for the adoption of both inductive and deductive approaches, allowing one to operationalize and analyze the religion itself, to test whether it embodies any principles that might hinder development by facilitating for the construction of a quantitative measure, which seeks to differentiate between the religion and the behavior of its constituents, as well as facilitate for a descriptive study of the religion itself. An example of how to utilize the framework developed is provided for the case of Islam, where the concept of Mafsada, public harm, in the Maqasid of Shariah, the purpose of Islamic jurisprudence, is operationalized, alongside Adam Smith’s Worthless Fellow in the Theory of Moral Sentiments, to develop a composite measure whose corollaries represent behavior a worthless fellow might engage in and would subsequently lead to societal harm. These corollaries can also be adopted in an empirical study as independent variables. Moreover, Ibn Khuldon’s Theory of Development is also utilized along with Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic to facilitate for the study as to why Muslim countries are underdeveloped, and whether their poor development is attributable to Islam, or due to factors relating to culture, justice, politics, and others. This study utilizes a causal research design as it facilitates for better understanding the nature and the extent of the relationship between variables in poorly understood phenomena—behavior, religion, and how, and whether, they can impact development.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic well being</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Protestant ethic</subject><subject>Protestant Reformation</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic development</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Weber, Max (1864-1920)</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>2662-9992</issn><issn>2662-9992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhYMoKLV_wNWAW0fznsSdio-C4EZxGTLJTU2dTmoyVuqvd7Qibu49XA7nHvgQOiL4lGDRnBVOhNY1pqzGpMG0JjvogEpJa6013f2n99G0lAXGmApCOVUH6PkSXuw6pnxSZejiPKb-pLK9r0pyMdXgUp-W0VUe1tCl1RL64byyVdn0wwuU-Am-GkXKMERnuypku4SPlF8P0V6wXYHp756gp5vrx6u7-v7hdnZ1cV87psRQc4FxE4TUQSkvWqdbKqxzvmGaQKMU4zxQDt5LpzgFzDUo1noQ3jIbpGQTNNvm-mQXZpXj0uaNSTaan0PKc2Pz2K0DExrniXBtgIZx21ItPVAnOAssSCLJmHW8zVrl9PYOZTCL9J77sb6hirBG0XGMLrp1uZxKyRD-vhJsvnmYLQ8z8jA_PAxhXy6TfkU</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><general>Springer Nature</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7730-0074</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework</title><author>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic well being</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Protestant ethic</topic><topic>Protestant Reformation</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic development</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Weber, Max (1864-1920)</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Humanities &amp; social sciences communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework</atitle><jtitle>Humanities &amp; social sciences communications</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>241-15</pages><artnum>241</artnum><issn>2662-9992</issn><eissn>2662-9992</eissn><abstract>Due to theoretical shortcomings, most of the literature that examines the impact of religion on economic well-being fails to distinguish between the religion and the religion constituents. Moreover, the current framework has a narrow focus on economic well-being, does not facilitate for empirical testing, and is troubled by the problem of endogeneity. This paper introduces a framework for the empirical and descriptive study of the impact of religion on socio-economic development. The framework introduced facilitates for the adoption of both inductive and deductive approaches, allowing one to operationalize and analyze the religion itself, to test whether it embodies any principles that might hinder development by facilitating for the construction of a quantitative measure, which seeks to differentiate between the religion and the behavior of its constituents, as well as facilitate for a descriptive study of the religion itself. An example of how to utilize the framework developed is provided for the case of Islam, where the concept of Mafsada, public harm, in the Maqasid of Shariah, the purpose of Islamic jurisprudence, is operationalized, alongside Adam Smith’s Worthless Fellow in the Theory of Moral Sentiments, to develop a composite measure whose corollaries represent behavior a worthless fellow might engage in and would subsequently lead to societal harm. These corollaries can also be adopted in an empirical study as independent variables. Moreover, Ibn Khuldon’s Theory of Development is also utilized along with Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic to facilitate for the study as to why Muslim countries are underdeveloped, and whether their poor development is attributable to Islam, or due to factors relating to culture, justice, politics, and others. This study utilizes a causal research design as it facilitates for better understanding the nature and the extent of the relationship between variables in poorly understood phenomena—behavior, religion, and how, and whether, they can impact development.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan</pub><doi>10.1057/s41599-023-01702-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7730-0074</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2662-9992
ispartof Humanities & social sciences communications, 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.241-15, Article 241
issn 2662-9992
2662-9992
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f7cd15cbfe734ab296de2c543f3f6161
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Behavior
Capitalism
Cultural change
Developing countries
Economic development
Economic growth
Economic theory
Economic well being
Hypotheses
Independent variables
Islam
Jurisprudence
LDCs
Measures
Protestant ethic
Protestant Reformation
Protestantism
Religion
Research design
Sociocultural factors
Socioeconomic development
Variables
Weber, Max (1864-1920)
Well being
title Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior,%20religion,%20and%20socio-economic%20development:%20a%20synthesized%20theoretical%20framework&rft.jtitle=Humanities%20&%20social%20sciences%20communications&rft.au=Al%20Fozaie,%20Mohammad%20Tariq&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=241-15&rft.artnum=241&rft.issn=2662-9992&rft.eissn=2662-9992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41599-023-01702-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2813782137%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-45007f569f88d5bc9b25accd7391e788344f24edd6c842e049e83bde5da3af663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2813782137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true