A More Targeted and Selective Use of Implantable Loop Recorders Improves the Effectiveness of Syncope Units: A Single-Center Experience

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.871
• Main Authors: Archontakis, Stefanos, Oikonomou, Evangelos, Sideris, Konstantinos, Dourvas, Panagiotis, Milaras, Nikias, Kostakis, Panagiotis, Klogkeri, Tzonatan, Triantafyllou, Epameinondas, Theofilis, Panagiotis, Ntalakouras, Ioannis, Arsenos, Petros, Gkika, Athanasia, Gatzoulis, Konstantinos, Sideris, Skevos, Tousoulis, Dimitris
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac stress tests; Cardiology; Diagnosis; Effectiveness; EKG; Electrocardiography; Emergency medical care; Fainting; Hospitals; implantable loop recorder; Ischemia; Patients; Recorders; Syncope; syncope unit; tilt table test; unexplained syncope; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life14070871

Syncope remains a common medical problem. Recently, the role of dedicated syncope units and implantable loop recorders has emerged in the investigation of unexplained syncope. This study aims to investigate the possibilities for a more rational and targeted use of various diagnostic tools. In this retrospective single-center study, 196 patients with unexplained syncope were included between March 2019 and February 2023. Various diagnostic tools were utilized during the investigation, according to clinical judgement. Patients were retrospectively allocated into Group A (including those who, among other tests, underwent loop recorder insertion) and Group B (including patients investigated without loop recorder implantation). Data were compared with Group C, including patients assessed prior to syncope unit establishment. There was no difference between Group A ( = 133) and Group B ( = 63) in the diagnostic yield (74% vs. 76%, = 0.22). There were significant differences between Groups A and B regarding age (67.3 ± 16.9 years vs. 48.3 ± 19.1 years, < 0.001) and cause of syncope (cardiogenic in 69% of Group A, reflex syncope in 77% of Group B, < 0.001). Electrocardiography-based diagnosis occurred in 55% and 19% of Groups A and B, respectively ( < 0.001). The time to diagnosis was 4.2 ± 2.7 months in Group A and 7.5 ± 5.6 months in Group B ( < 0.001). In Group C, the diagnostic yield was 57.9% and the electrocardiography-based diagnostic yield was 18.3%. A selective use of loop recorders according to clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics increases the effectiveness of the structured syncope unit approach and further preserves financial resources.