Loading…

Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use

U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contraception: X 2024-01, Vol.6, p.100107, Article 100107
Main Authors: Taylor, Douglas J., Kapp, Nathalie, Steiner, Markus J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-7a13c09b49df03b7d9bcd6b19f2ee089317b6c8ec144e5e9bd998f059fbc2733
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100107
container_title Contraception: X
container_volume 6
creator Taylor, Douglas J.
Kapp, Nathalie
Steiner, Markus J.
description U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if it were taken up to a few hours before unprotected sex. We expanded on an existing mathematical model for the maximum attainable effectiveness of LNG-EC, assuming it exclusively works to disrupt ovulation, and compared results with point estimates from nine studies when it was taken up to 72 hours after sex. We then modelled how effectiveness might have improved if subjects had taken LNG-EC up to 3 hours before sex. Taking LNG-EC immediately after sex could potentially reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy by 91%. However, population-average maximum attainable effectiveness levels ranged from just 49% to 67% when accounting for the distributions of postcoital treatment delays in the example studies. If half the subjects had taken it 3 hours before sex, then maximum effectiveness levels would have ranged from 70% to 81%. At the individual level, taking LNG-EC a few hours before sex is a logical extension of Selected Practice Recommendations regarding an advanced supply of EC and, based on our modeling, should be advocated for people who can reasonably anticipate an unprotected sex act. In the absence of more clinical data, however, people should not routinely rely on precoital use of LNG-EC to prevent pregnancy unless modern, effective contraceptives are inaccessible to them. Based on mathematical modeling, individuals who anticipate needing to take LNG-EC for an impending unprotected act of sex could further reduce their chance of an undesired pregnancy by taking it a few hours in advance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f855257110fb41199f59dceb54efa08b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590151624000042</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f855257110fb41199f59dceb54efa08b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3074727993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-7a13c09b49df03b7d9bcd6b19f2ee089317b6c8ec144e5e9bd998f059fbc2733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAPnLZxePE6wxCQqjiT6UiLnu3bGe89SqJFzu7ankanoUnw-mWqr1wsj3zzc8z81XVa-BL4LB6t126ON4sBRdNCXDg6ll1KiTyBUhYPX90P6nOc95yzkUNTQvqZXVStyiFUnhajd_NTRjCrzBu2HRNjLwnN4UDjZQzi57BUv75PWxYT4c4xrShPCXqmY-J0UDlPbpbVlqZknG0m0Ic37N1ATmT6U61S-RimEzP9pleVS-86TOd359n1frL5_XFt8XVj6-XF5-uFq5uW7VQBmrH0TbYeV5b1aF13coCekHEW6xB2ZVryUHTkCS0HWLruURvnVB1fVZdHrFdNFu9S2Ew6VZHE_RdoIyhTZqC60n7VkohFQD3tgFA9BI7R1Y25A1vbWF9PLJ2eztQSc2j9k-gTzNjuNabeNAAAhpEXghv7wkp_tyXBeohZEd9b0aK-6xrrholFOLcuDhKXYo5J_IP_wDXs-96q2ff9ey7Pvpeit487vCh5J_LRfDhKKCy8kOgpLMLxTjqQjFnKksJ_-P_BTrfwXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074727993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Taylor, Douglas J. ; Kapp, Nathalie ; Steiner, Markus J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Douglas J. ; Kapp, Nathalie ; Steiner, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><description>U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if it were taken up to a few hours before unprotected sex. We expanded on an existing mathematical model for the maximum attainable effectiveness of LNG-EC, assuming it exclusively works to disrupt ovulation, and compared results with point estimates from nine studies when it was taken up to 72 hours after sex. We then modelled how effectiveness might have improved if subjects had taken LNG-EC up to 3 hours before sex. Taking LNG-EC immediately after sex could potentially reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy by 91%. However, population-average maximum attainable effectiveness levels ranged from just 49% to 67% when accounting for the distributions of postcoital treatment delays in the example studies. If half the subjects had taken it 3 hours before sex, then maximum effectiveness levels would have ranged from 70% to 81%. At the individual level, taking LNG-EC a few hours before sex is a logical extension of Selected Practice Recommendations regarding an advanced supply of EC and, based on our modeling, should be advocated for people who can reasonably anticipate an unprotected sex act. In the absence of more clinical data, however, people should not routinely rely on precoital use of LNG-EC to prevent pregnancy unless modern, effective contraceptives are inaccessible to them. Based on mathematical modeling, individuals who anticipate needing to take LNG-EC for an impending unprotected act of sex could further reduce their chance of an undesired pregnancy by taking it a few hours in advance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-1516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-1516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38952779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Emergency contraception ; Levonorgestrel ; Mathematical modeling ; Original Research ; Unintended pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Contraception: X, 2024-01, Vol.6, p.100107, Article 100107</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-7a13c09b49df03b7d9bcd6b19f2ee089317b6c8ec144e5e9bd998f059fbc2733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4658-5369</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214990/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151624000042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38952779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapp, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><title>Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use</title><title>Contraception: X</title><addtitle>Contracept X</addtitle><description>U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if it were taken up to a few hours before unprotected sex. We expanded on an existing mathematical model for the maximum attainable effectiveness of LNG-EC, assuming it exclusively works to disrupt ovulation, and compared results with point estimates from nine studies when it was taken up to 72 hours after sex. We then modelled how effectiveness might have improved if subjects had taken LNG-EC up to 3 hours before sex. Taking LNG-EC immediately after sex could potentially reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy by 91%. However, population-average maximum attainable effectiveness levels ranged from just 49% to 67% when accounting for the distributions of postcoital treatment delays in the example studies. If half the subjects had taken it 3 hours before sex, then maximum effectiveness levels would have ranged from 70% to 81%. At the individual level, taking LNG-EC a few hours before sex is a logical extension of Selected Practice Recommendations regarding an advanced supply of EC and, based on our modeling, should be advocated for people who can reasonably anticipate an unprotected sex act. In the absence of more clinical data, however, people should not routinely rely on precoital use of LNG-EC to prevent pregnancy unless modern, effective contraceptives are inaccessible to them. Based on mathematical modeling, individuals who anticipate needing to take LNG-EC for an impending unprotected act of sex could further reduce their chance of an undesired pregnancy by taking it a few hours in advance.</description><subject>Emergency contraception</subject><subject>Levonorgestrel</subject><subject>Mathematical modeling</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Unintended pregnancy</subject><issn>2590-1516</issn><issn>2590-1516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAPnLZxePE6wxCQqjiT6UiLnu3bGe89SqJFzu7ankanoUnw-mWqr1wsj3zzc8z81XVa-BL4LB6t126ON4sBRdNCXDg6ll1KiTyBUhYPX90P6nOc95yzkUNTQvqZXVStyiFUnhajd_NTRjCrzBu2HRNjLwnN4UDjZQzi57BUv75PWxYT4c4xrShPCXqmY-J0UDlPbpbVlqZknG0m0Ic37N1ATmT6U61S-RimEzP9pleVS-86TOd359n1frL5_XFt8XVj6-XF5-uFq5uW7VQBmrH0TbYeV5b1aF13coCekHEW6xB2ZVryUHTkCS0HWLruURvnVB1fVZdHrFdNFu9S2Ew6VZHE_RdoIyhTZqC60n7VkohFQD3tgFA9BI7R1Y25A1vbWF9PLJ2eztQSc2j9k-gTzNjuNabeNAAAhpEXghv7wkp_tyXBeohZEd9b0aK-6xrrholFOLcuDhKXYo5J_IP_wDXs-96q2ff9ey7Pvpeit487vCh5J_LRfDhKKCy8kOgpLMLxTjqQjFnKksJ_-P_BTrfwXY</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Taylor, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Kapp, Nathalie</creator><creator>Steiner, Markus J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-5369</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use</title><author>Taylor, Douglas J. ; Kapp, Nathalie ; Steiner, Markus J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-7a13c09b49df03b7d9bcd6b19f2ee089317b6c8ec144e5e9bd998f059fbc2733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Emergency contraception</topic><topic>Levonorgestrel</topic><topic>Mathematical modeling</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Unintended pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapp, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Contraception: X</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Douglas J.</au><au>Kapp, Nathalie</au><au>Steiner, Markus J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use</atitle><jtitle>Contraception: X</jtitle><addtitle>Contracept X</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>100107</spage><pages>100107-</pages><artnum>100107</artnum><issn>2590-1516</issn><eissn>2590-1516</eissn><abstract>U.S. and World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use state people may have an advanced supply of emergency contraception (EC) to minimize treatment delays. We sought to characterize the potential improvement in effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) if it were taken up to a few hours before unprotected sex. We expanded on an existing mathematical model for the maximum attainable effectiveness of LNG-EC, assuming it exclusively works to disrupt ovulation, and compared results with point estimates from nine studies when it was taken up to 72 hours after sex. We then modelled how effectiveness might have improved if subjects had taken LNG-EC up to 3 hours before sex. Taking LNG-EC immediately after sex could potentially reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy by 91%. However, population-average maximum attainable effectiveness levels ranged from just 49% to 67% when accounting for the distributions of postcoital treatment delays in the example studies. If half the subjects had taken it 3 hours before sex, then maximum effectiveness levels would have ranged from 70% to 81%. At the individual level, taking LNG-EC a few hours before sex is a logical extension of Selected Practice Recommendations regarding an advanced supply of EC and, based on our modeling, should be advocated for people who can reasonably anticipate an unprotected sex act. In the absence of more clinical data, however, people should not routinely rely on precoital use of LNG-EC to prevent pregnancy unless modern, effective contraceptives are inaccessible to them. Based on mathematical modeling, individuals who anticipate needing to take LNG-EC for an impending unprotected act of sex could further reduce their chance of an undesired pregnancy by taking it a few hours in advance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38952779</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.conx.2024.100107</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-5369</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-1516
ispartof Contraception: X, 2024-01, Vol.6, p.100107, Article 100107
issn 2590-1516
2590-1516
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f855257110fb41199f59dceb54efa08b
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel
Mathematical modeling
Original Research
Unintended pregnancy
title Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximizing%20the%20effectiveness%20of%201.5%C2%A0mg%20levonorgestrel%20for%20emergency%20contraception:%20The%20case%20for%20precoital%20use&rft.jtitle=Contraception:%20X&rft.au=Taylor,%20Douglas%20J.&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=100107&rft.pages=100107-&rft.artnum=100107&rft.issn=2590-1516&rft.eissn=2590-1516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conx.2024.100107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3074727993%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-7a13c09b49df03b7d9bcd6b19f2ee089317b6c8ec144e5e9bd998f059fbc2733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074727993&rft_id=info:pmid/38952779&rfr_iscdi=true