Evaluation of artificial intelligence model for crowding categorization and extraction diagnosis using intraoral photographs

• Published in: Scientific reports 2023-03, Vol.13 (1), p.5177-5177, Article 5177
• Main Authors: Ryu, Jiho, Kim, Ye-Hyun, Kim, Tae-Woo, Jung, Seok-Ki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 639/705/117; 692/699/3020; Artificial Intelligence; Decision making; Deep learning; Diagnosis; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Malocclusion - diagnosis; Malocclusion - therapy; Maxilla; multidisciplinary; Neural networks; Orthodontics; Performance evaluation; Photography, Dental; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Teeth; Tooth; Tooth Extraction; Tooth extractions
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32514-7

Determining the severity of dental crowding and the necessity of tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment planning are time-consuming processes and there are no firm criteria. Thus, automated assistance would be useful to clinicians. This study aimed to construct and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist with such treatment planning. A total of 3,136 orthodontic occlusal photographs with annotations by two orthodontists were obtained. Four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, were adopted for the AI process. Using the intraoral photographs as input, the crowding group and the necessity of tooth extraction were obtained. Arch length discrepancy analysis with AI-detected landmarks was used for crowding categorization. Various statistical and visual analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance. The maxillary and mandibular VGG19 models showed minimum mean errors of 0.84 mm and 1.06 mm for teeth landmark detection, respectively. Analysis of Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficient indicated that crowding categorization performance was best in VGG19 (0.73), decreasing in the order of VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50. For tooth extraction, the maxillary VGG19 model showed the highest accuracy (0.922) and AUC (0.961). By utilizing deep learning with orthodontic photographs, dental crowding categorization and diagnosis of orthodontic extraction were successfully determined. This suggests that AI can assist clinicians in the diagnosis and decision making of treatment plans.