Loading…

Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient preference and adherence 2024-01, Vol.18, p.2455-2467
Main Authors: Zhao, Ming-Yu, Zeng, Wen, Chan, Sze Ngai, Du, Jianhao, Rao, Naman, Liu, Taoran, Ming, Wai-Kit
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1e70fe279f927c8143b8201a183065498089c5fdb6e89c5b04cdb89d3b7e13193
container_end_page 2467
container_issue
container_start_page 2455
container_title Patient preference and adherence
container_volume 18
creator Zhao, Ming-Yu
Zeng, Wen
Chan, Sze Ngai
Du, Jianhao
Rao, Naman
Liu, Taoran
Ming, Wai-Kit
description The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss. The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a "snowball" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility. 287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment. In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/PPA.S475061
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f9ae63a7cfbe415f98478b2f94cfccc8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f9ae63a7cfbe415f98478b2f94cfccc8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3146628460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1e70fe279f927c8143b8201a183065498089c5fdb6e89c5b04cdb89d3b7e13193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxVeIipbCiTvyjUoorb_iDy4oCgUqtSJSg8TN8nrHWVebdbCdCv57nCZU7WmeZp5-Y89rmncEn1PC5cViMTu_5XKKBXnRnBAi5UQp_evlE33cvM75DmPBBCWvmmOmhcCU8pOmX9gSYCz5A1ok8JBgdJCRjwmVHtAygS3rOkfRI4tuw7gaAN2EnKtCyxhLj8KI5n0Y7Sc0Q19CdgkK1E4MDtDlnw2ksAO8aY68HTK8PdTT5ufXy-X8--T6x7er-ex64hgTZUJAYg9Uaq-pdIpw1iqKiSWKYTHlWmGl3dR3rYCdaDF3Xat0x1oJhBHNTpurPbeL9s5s6nKb_ppog3loxLQyNpXgBjBeWxDMSudb4GTqteJStdRr7rxzTlXW5z1rs23X0Ln6jWSHZ9DnkzH0ZhXvDSGCaiFFJZwdCCn-3kIuZl0vBMNgR4jbbBjhQlDFBa7Wj3urSzHnmsXjHoLNLmhTgzaHoKv7_dOnPXr_J8v-ARHCpBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146628460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Zhao, Ming-Yu ; Zeng, Wen ; Chan, Sze Ngai ; Du, Jianhao ; Rao, Naman ; Liu, Taoran ; Ming, Wai-Kit</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ming-Yu ; Zeng, Wen ; Chan, Sze Ngai ; Du, Jianhao ; Rao, Naman ; Liu, Taoran ; Ming, Wai-Kit</creatorcontrib><description>The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss. The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a "snowball" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility. 287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment. In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S475061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39660224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove</publisher><subject>choice behavior ; discrete choice experiment ; Original Research ; patients’ preferences ; restoration treatment</subject><ispartof>Patient preference and adherence, 2024-01, Vol.18, p.2455-2467</ispartof><rights>2024 Zhao et al.</rights><rights>2024 Zhao et al. 2024 Zhao et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1e70fe279f927c8143b8201a183065498089c5fdb6e89c5b04cdb89d3b7e13193</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6680-4269 ; 0000-0003-3184-4487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629676/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629676/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39660224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ming-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Sze Ngai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Taoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Wai-Kit</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><title>Patient preference and adherence</title><addtitle>Patient Prefer Adherence</addtitle><description>The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss. The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a "snowball" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility. 287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment. In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.</description><subject>choice behavior</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>patients’ preferences</subject><subject>restoration treatment</subject><issn>1177-889X</issn><issn>1177-889X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxVeIipbCiTvyjUoorb_iDy4oCgUqtSJSg8TN8nrHWVebdbCdCv57nCZU7WmeZp5-Y89rmncEn1PC5cViMTu_5XKKBXnRnBAi5UQp_evlE33cvM75DmPBBCWvmmOmhcCU8pOmX9gSYCz5A1ok8JBgdJCRjwmVHtAygS3rOkfRI4tuw7gaAN2EnKtCyxhLj8KI5n0Y7Sc0Q19CdgkK1E4MDtDlnw2ksAO8aY68HTK8PdTT5ufXy-X8--T6x7er-ex64hgTZUJAYg9Uaq-pdIpw1iqKiSWKYTHlWmGl3dR3rYCdaDF3Xat0x1oJhBHNTpurPbeL9s5s6nKb_ppog3loxLQyNpXgBjBeWxDMSudb4GTqteJStdRr7rxzTlXW5z1rs23X0Ln6jWSHZ9DnkzH0ZhXvDSGCaiFFJZwdCCn-3kIuZl0vBMNgR4jbbBjhQlDFBa7Wj3urSzHnmsXjHoLNLmhTgzaHoKv7_dOnPXr_J8v-ARHCpBQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Zhao, Ming-Yu</creator><creator>Zeng, Wen</creator><creator>Chan, Sze Ngai</creator><creator>Du, Jianhao</creator><creator>Rao, Naman</creator><creator>Liu, Taoran</creator><creator>Ming, Wai-Kit</creator><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-4269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-4487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><author>Zhao, Ming-Yu ; Zeng, Wen ; Chan, Sze Ngai ; Du, Jianhao ; Rao, Naman ; Liu, Taoran ; Ming, Wai-Kit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1e70fe279f927c8143b8201a183065498089c5fdb6e89c5b04cdb89d3b7e13193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>choice behavior</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>patients’ preferences</topic><topic>restoration treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ming-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Sze Ngai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Naman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Taoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Wai-Kit</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Ming-Yu</au><au>Zeng, Wen</au><au>Chan, Sze Ngai</au><au>Du, Jianhao</au><au>Rao, Naman</au><au>Liu, Taoran</au><au>Ming, Wai-Kit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle><addtitle>Patient Prefer Adherence</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><spage>2455</spage><epage>2467</epage><pages>2455-2467</pages><issn>1177-889X</issn><eissn>1177-889X</eissn><abstract>The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss. The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a "snowball" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility. 287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment. In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove</pub><pmid>39660224</pmid><doi>10.2147/PPA.S475061</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-4269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-4487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1177-889X
ispartof Patient preference and adherence, 2024-01, Vol.18, p.2455-2467
issn 1177-889X
1177-889X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f9ae63a7cfbe415f98478b2f94cfccc8
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed
subjects choice behavior
discrete choice experiment
Original Research
patients’ preferences
restoration treatment
title Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20Preferences%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20a%20Single%20Missing%20Tooth%20in%20China:%20A%20Discrete%20Choice%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Patient%20preference%20and%20adherence&rft.au=Zhao,%20Ming-Yu&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=2455&rft.epage=2467&rft.pages=2455-2467&rft.issn=1177-889X&rft.eissn=1177-889X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/PPA.S475061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3146628460%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1e70fe279f927c8143b8201a183065498089c5fdb6e89c5b04cdb89d3b7e13193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146628460&rft_id=info:pmid/39660224&rfr_iscdi=true