The Impact of Prehospital Point of Care Ultrasounds on Emergency Patients Length of Stay in Thailand

Globally, emergency departments (ED) are faced with an overcrowding problem. This issue is further compounded due to the multitude of contributing factors. Point of Care ultrasound (POCUS), especially when performed in prehospital care, that is before the patient is admitted to the ED has a high pot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 2023-01, Vol.16, p.219-226
Main Authors: Ienghong, Kamonwon, Cheung, Lap Woon, Tiamkao, Somsak, Bhudhisawasdi, Vajarabhongsa, Apiratwarakul, Korakot
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdomen
Clinical outcomes
crowding
emergency departments
Emergency medical care
Emergency medicine
Emergency services
Hospitals
Laboratories
Length of stay
Medical records
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Original Research
Overcrowding
Patients
Physicians
prehospital emergency care
Training
Ultrasonic imaging
ultrasonography
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Globally, emergency departments (ED) are faced with an overcrowding problem. This issue is further compounded due to the multitude of contributing factors. Point of Care ultrasound (POCUS), especially when performed in prehospital care, that is before the patient is admitted to the ED has a high potential to reduce time of diagnosis and time of investigation which leads to shorter ED length of stay (LOS). The primary focus was on variances in ED LOS between the prehospital POCUS group and the standard care group. A cross-sectional study was conducted on prehospital patients who were admitted to the ED at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand, from January to December 2021. We divided patients into two groups including patients who obtained prehospital POCUS (the prehospital POCUS group) and patients who received standard care treatment in which there was no prehospital POCUS performed (the standard care group). POCUS and ED medical records were documented and submitted for analysis. Of 1348 prehospital patients, 840 were enrolled in this study: 169 with prehospital POCUS and 671 with standard care. Median LOS in the prehospital POCUS group was 159 min (IQR 89,289) versus 165 (IQR 102,330) in the standard care group (p = 0.125). Further imaging diagnostic test which affected ED LOS more than four hours was lower in the prehospital POCUS group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.729-1.666) than in the standard care group. The factor associated with increased odds of ED LOS more than four hour in the prehospital POCUS group was admission to hospital (adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI, 1.230-2.239). Patients evaluated with prehospital POCUS had a shorter LOS than the only standard care treatment without statistical significance.
ISSN:1178-2390
1178-2390
DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S396986