Loading…

Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex

Leptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC biology 2023-11, Vol.21 (1), p.1-247, Article 247
Main Authors: Gay, Elise J, Jacques, Noémie, Lapalu, Nicolas, Cruaud, Corinne, Laval, Valerie, Balesdent, Marie-Hélène, Rouxel, Thierry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633
container_end_page 247
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title BMC biology
container_volume 21
creator Gay, Elise J
Jacques, Noémie
Lapalu, Nicolas
Cruaud, Corinne
Laval, Valerie
Balesdent, Marie-Hélène
Rouxel, Thierry
description Leptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final necrotic stage at the stem base, and both perform sexual crossings on plant residues. L. biglobosa is suggested to be a potential biocontrol agent against Lmb, but there has been no mechanistic investigation of the different types of interactions that may occur between the plant and the two fungal species. We investigated the bi- or tripartite interaction mechanisms by (i) confronting Lmb and Lbb in culture conditions or during cotyledon infection, with different timing and/or spore concentration regimes, (ii) performing RNA-Seq experiments in vitro or on the kinetics of infection of cotyledons infected by Lmb and/or Lbb to evaluate the transcriptomic activity and the plant response when both fungal species are inoculated together. Lbb infection of B. napus cotyledons was typical of a necrotrophic behavior, with a very early setup of one pathogenicity program and very limited colonization of tissues. This contrasted with the complex succession of pathogenicity programs of the hemibiotroph Lmb. During simultaneous co-infection by both species, Lmb was strongly impacted in its growth and transcriptomic dynamics both in vitro and in planta, while Lbb was unaffected by the presence of Lmb. However, the drastic inhibition of Lmb growth by Lbb was ineffective in the case of delayed inoculation with Lbb or a lower amount of spores of Lbb compared to Lmb. Our data suggest that Lmb growth inhibition by Lbb is the result of a combination of factors that may include competition for trophic resources, the generation by Lbb of an environment unsuitable for the lifecycle of Lmb or/and the effect on Lmb of plant defense responses induced by Lbb. It indicates that growth inhibition occurs in very specific conditions (i.e., co-inoculation at the same place of an equal amount of inoculum) that are unlikely to occur in the field where their coexistence does not prevent any species from completing their life cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12915-023-01726-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2036cc7a9640ef96c4932db1111d0d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771961742</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb2036cc7a9640ef96c4932db1111d0d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A771961742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSNERUvhBVhZYkMXaW3HsePlqAI60kiV-NtajnOd8ZDEwfaU9u1xOggYxAJ7Yev6u0fyObcoXhF8SUjDryKhktQlplWJiaC8bJ4UZ0QwUgqMxdM_7qfF8xh3GNNaiOpZcVoJWXFSk7Pi-8YbnZyfkJ46lNzoph71_g7ChFJwsw7JJUBuShC0WcCIvEV2P_V6QPP2IflZp63vIT8sElsfU8ZR2gKKCUZk9PQVAoozGAcRGT_OA9y_KE6sHiK8_HmeF5_fvf10fVNubt-vr1eb0tSNSGUNjYWWGMKxbDvbAdPQMcmhNcJI0UItW0ZJo3kLprGNtpSRKjsiqWSMV9V5sT7odl7v1BzcqMOD8tqpx4IPvVq-aAZQtqW44sYILTnDYCU3TFa0a0leHe6y1sVBa6uHI6mb1UYtNcxoQzhhdySzbw7sHPy3PcSkRhcNDIOewO-jok0jmBBM4oy-_gvd-X2YsiuZkhjXvKLiN5V9B-Um61MOZBFVKyGI5DlsmqnLf1B5dzA64yewLtePGi6OGjKT4D71eh-jWn_88P_s7Zdjlh5YE3yMAewvwwhWy_Sqw_SqnJV6nF7VVD8AltTduA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890056327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gay, Elise J ; Jacques, Noémie ; Lapalu, Nicolas ; Cruaud, Corinne ; Laval, Valerie ; Balesdent, Marie-Hélène ; Rouxel, Thierry</creator><creatorcontrib>Gay, Elise J ; Jacques, Noémie ; Lapalu, Nicolas ; Cruaud, Corinne ; Laval, Valerie ; Balesdent, Marie-Hélène ; Rouxel, Thierry</creatorcontrib><description>Leptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final necrotic stage at the stem base, and both perform sexual crossings on plant residues. L. biglobosa is suggested to be a potential biocontrol agent against Lmb, but there has been no mechanistic investigation of the different types of interactions that may occur between the plant and the two fungal species. We investigated the bi- or tripartite interaction mechanisms by (i) confronting Lmb and Lbb in culture conditions or during cotyledon infection, with different timing and/or spore concentration regimes, (ii) performing RNA-Seq experiments in vitro or on the kinetics of infection of cotyledons infected by Lmb and/or Lbb to evaluate the transcriptomic activity and the plant response when both fungal species are inoculated together. Lbb infection of B. napus cotyledons was typical of a necrotrophic behavior, with a very early setup of one pathogenicity program and very limited colonization of tissues. This contrasted with the complex succession of pathogenicity programs of the hemibiotroph Lmb. During simultaneous co-infection by both species, Lmb was strongly impacted in its growth and transcriptomic dynamics both in vitro and in planta, while Lbb was unaffected by the presence of Lmb. However, the drastic inhibition of Lmb growth by Lbb was ineffective in the case of delayed inoculation with Lbb or a lower amount of spores of Lbb compared to Lmb. Our data suggest that Lmb growth inhibition by Lbb is the result of a combination of factors that may include competition for trophic resources, the generation by Lbb of an environment unsuitable for the lifecycle of Lmb or/and the effect on Lmb of plant defense responses induced by Lbb. It indicates that growth inhibition occurs in very specific conditions (i.e., co-inoculation at the same place of an equal amount of inoculum) that are unlikely to occur in the field where their coexistence does not prevent any species from completing their life cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-7007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-7007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01726-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37936151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Biological control ; Blackleg ; Brassica ; Brassica napus ; Coexistence ; Colonization ; Cotyledons ; Defense mechanisms ; Environmental Sciences ; Fungal biology ; Fungi ; Gene expression ; Health aspects ; Infection ; Infections ; Inoculation ; Inoculum ; Leaves ; Leptosphaeria biglobosa ; Leptosphaeria maculans ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycles ; Life Sciences ; Lifestyles ; Management ; Pathogenicity ; Pathogens ; Pests ; Plant diseases ; Prevention ; Rapeseed ; RNA ; RNA sequencing ; Species ; Spores ; Stem canker ; Stems ; Transcriptomics ; Tripartite interactions</subject><ispartof>BMC biology, 2023-11, Vol.21 (1), p.1-247, Article 247</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9563-1793 ; 0000-0002-4752-7278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890056327/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890056327?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04281614$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gay, Elise J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapalu, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruaud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balesdent, Marie-Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouxel, Thierry</creatorcontrib><title>Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex</title><title>BMC biology</title><description>Leptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final necrotic stage at the stem base, and both perform sexual crossings on plant residues. L. biglobosa is suggested to be a potential biocontrol agent against Lmb, but there has been no mechanistic investigation of the different types of interactions that may occur between the plant and the two fungal species. We investigated the bi- or tripartite interaction mechanisms by (i) confronting Lmb and Lbb in culture conditions or during cotyledon infection, with different timing and/or spore concentration regimes, (ii) performing RNA-Seq experiments in vitro or on the kinetics of infection of cotyledons infected by Lmb and/or Lbb to evaluate the transcriptomic activity and the plant response when both fungal species are inoculated together. Lbb infection of B. napus cotyledons was typical of a necrotrophic behavior, with a very early setup of one pathogenicity program and very limited colonization of tissues. This contrasted with the complex succession of pathogenicity programs of the hemibiotroph Lmb. During simultaneous co-infection by both species, Lmb was strongly impacted in its growth and transcriptomic dynamics both in vitro and in planta, while Lbb was unaffected by the presence of Lmb. However, the drastic inhibition of Lmb growth by Lbb was ineffective in the case of delayed inoculation with Lbb or a lower amount of spores of Lbb compared to Lmb. Our data suggest that Lmb growth inhibition by Lbb is the result of a combination of factors that may include competition for trophic resources, the generation by Lbb of an environment unsuitable for the lifecycle of Lmb or/and the effect on Lmb of plant defense responses induced by Lbb. It indicates that growth inhibition occurs in very specific conditions (i.e., co-inoculation at the same place of an equal amount of inoculum) that are unlikely to occur in the field where their coexistence does not prevent any species from completing their life cycle.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Blackleg</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cotyledons</subject><subject>Defense mechanisms</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fungal biology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Leptosphaeria biglobosa</subject><subject>Leptosphaeria maculans</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Pathogenicity</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Rapeseed</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA sequencing</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Spores</subject><subject>Stem canker</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Transcriptomics</subject><subject>Tripartite interactions</subject><issn>1741-7007</issn><issn>1741-7007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSNERUvhBVhZYkMXaW3HsePlqAI60kiV-NtajnOd8ZDEwfaU9u1xOggYxAJ7Yev6u0fyObcoXhF8SUjDryKhktQlplWJiaC8bJ4UZ0QwUgqMxdM_7qfF8xh3GNNaiOpZcVoJWXFSk7Pi-8YbnZyfkJ46lNzoph71_g7ChFJwsw7JJUBuShC0WcCIvEV2P_V6QPP2IflZp63vIT8sElsfU8ZR2gKKCUZk9PQVAoozGAcRGT_OA9y_KE6sHiK8_HmeF5_fvf10fVNubt-vr1eb0tSNSGUNjYWWGMKxbDvbAdPQMcmhNcJI0UItW0ZJo3kLprGNtpSRKjsiqWSMV9V5sT7odl7v1BzcqMOD8tqpx4IPvVq-aAZQtqW44sYILTnDYCU3TFa0a0leHe6y1sVBa6uHI6mb1UYtNcxoQzhhdySzbw7sHPy3PcSkRhcNDIOewO-jok0jmBBM4oy-_gvd-X2YsiuZkhjXvKLiN5V9B-Um61MOZBFVKyGI5DlsmqnLf1B5dzA64yewLtePGi6OGjKT4D71eh-jWn_88P_s7Zdjlh5YE3yMAewvwwhWy_Sqw_SqnJV6nF7VVD8AltTduA</recordid><startdate>20231107</startdate><enddate>20231107</enddate><creator>Gay, Elise J</creator><creator>Jacques, Noémie</creator><creator>Lapalu, Nicolas</creator><creator>Cruaud, Corinne</creator><creator>Laval, Valerie</creator><creator>Balesdent, Marie-Hélène</creator><creator>Rouxel, Thierry</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-1793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231107</creationdate><title>Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex</title><author>Gay, Elise J ; Jacques, Noémie ; Lapalu, Nicolas ; Cruaud, Corinne ; Laval, Valerie ; Balesdent, Marie-Hélène ; Rouxel, Thierry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Blackleg</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cotyledons</topic><topic>Defense mechanisms</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fungal biology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Leptosphaeria biglobosa</topic><topic>Leptosphaeria maculans</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Pathogenicity</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Rapeseed</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA sequencing</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Spores</topic><topic>Stem canker</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Transcriptomics</topic><topic>Tripartite interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gay, Elise J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapalu, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruaud, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balesdent, Marie-Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouxel, Thierry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gay, Elise J</au><au>Jacques, Noémie</au><au>Lapalu, Nicolas</au><au>Cruaud, Corinne</au><au>Laval, Valerie</au><au>Balesdent, Marie-Hélène</au><au>Rouxel, Thierry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex</atitle><jtitle>BMC biology</jtitle><date>2023-11-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>1-247</pages><artnum>247</artnum><issn>1741-7007</issn><eissn>1741-7007</eissn><abstract>Leptosphaeria maculans "brassicae" (Lmb) and Leptosphaeria biglobosa "brassicae" (Lbb) make up a species complex involved in the stem canker (blackleg) disease of rapeseed (Brassica napus). They coinfect rapeseed together, from the early stage of infection on leaves to the final necrotic stage at the stem base, and both perform sexual crossings on plant residues. L. biglobosa is suggested to be a potential biocontrol agent against Lmb, but there has been no mechanistic investigation of the different types of interactions that may occur between the plant and the two fungal species. We investigated the bi- or tripartite interaction mechanisms by (i) confronting Lmb and Lbb in culture conditions or during cotyledon infection, with different timing and/or spore concentration regimes, (ii) performing RNA-Seq experiments in vitro or on the kinetics of infection of cotyledons infected by Lmb and/or Lbb to evaluate the transcriptomic activity and the plant response when both fungal species are inoculated together. Lbb infection of B. napus cotyledons was typical of a necrotrophic behavior, with a very early setup of one pathogenicity program and very limited colonization of tissues. This contrasted with the complex succession of pathogenicity programs of the hemibiotroph Lmb. During simultaneous co-infection by both species, Lmb was strongly impacted in its growth and transcriptomic dynamics both in vitro and in planta, while Lbb was unaffected by the presence of Lmb. However, the drastic inhibition of Lmb growth by Lbb was ineffective in the case of delayed inoculation with Lbb or a lower amount of spores of Lbb compared to Lmb. Our data suggest that Lmb growth inhibition by Lbb is the result of a combination of factors that may include competition for trophic resources, the generation by Lbb of an environment unsuitable for the lifecycle of Lmb or/and the effect on Lmb of plant defense responses induced by Lbb. It indicates that growth inhibition occurs in very specific conditions (i.e., co-inoculation at the same place of an equal amount of inoculum) that are unlikely to occur in the field where their coexistence does not prevent any species from completing their life cycle.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>37936151</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12915-023-01726-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-1793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7278</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-7007
ispartof BMC biology, 2023-11, Vol.21 (1), p.1-247, Article 247
issn 1741-7007
1741-7007
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2036cc7a9640ef96c4932db1111d0d
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Agricultural land
Biological control
Blackleg
Brassica
Brassica napus
Coexistence
Colonization
Cotyledons
Defense mechanisms
Environmental Sciences
Fungal biology
Fungi
Gene expression
Health aspects
Infection
Infections
Inoculation
Inoculum
Leaves
Leptosphaeria biglobosa
Leptosphaeria maculans
Life cycle analysis
Life cycles
Life Sciences
Lifestyles
Management
Pathogenicity
Pathogens
Pests
Plant diseases
Prevention
Rapeseed
RNA
RNA sequencing
Species
Spores
Stem canker
Stems
Transcriptomics
Tripartite interactions
title Location and timing govern tripartite interactions of fungal phytopathogens and host in the stem canker species complex
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Location%20and%20timing%20govern%20tripartite%20interactions%20of%20fungal%20phytopathogens%20and%20host%20in%20the%20stem%20canker%20species%20complex&rft.jtitle=BMC%20biology&rft.au=Gay,%20Elise%20J&rft.date=2023-11-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=1-247&rft.artnum=247&rft.issn=1741-7007&rft.eissn=1741-7007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12915-023-01726-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA771961742%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-5e8feb1c1609bdfde4aed496ebc7c97be59b4218a6bec8f8af241302392944633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890056327&rft_id=info:pmid/37936151&rft_galeid=A771961742&rfr_iscdi=true