Loading…

How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study

Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-01, Vol.16 (11), p.e0256585
Main Authors: Helene Hoffmann, Christoph Baldow, Thomas Zerjatke, Andrea Gottschalk, Sebastian Wagner, Elena Karg, Sebastian Niehaus, Ingo Roeder, Ingmar Glauche, Nico Scherf
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0256585
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Helene Hoffmann
Christoph Baldow
Thomas Zerjatke
Andrea Gottschalk
Sebastian Wagner
Elena Karg
Sebastian Niehaus
Ingo Roeder
Ingmar Glauche
Nico Scherf
description Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0256585
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjMtKxDAUQIMgOD7-wMX9galp0qQz7kSUcT8Ld-U2uR1uTZuSpMr8vTD4Ca4OHDhHiMdaVrVu66cxrmnGUC1xpkoqY83OXIlNvddqa5XUN-I251FKo3fWbsTnIf5AibAk8uwKJAq4ZAKeIdD6RRMjrJnnExSeCDIlpgweCz7DC7g4LZiw8PelyBzYRchl9ed7cT1gyPTwxzvx8f52fD1sfcSxWxJPmM5dRO4uIqZTh6mwC9QNvXKqli0NTdugUei9ROol2qH3fbPX__n6BbKMZPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Helene Hoffmann ; Christoph Baldow ; Thomas Zerjatke ; Andrea Gottschalk ; Sebastian Wagner ; Elena Karg ; Sebastian Niehaus ; Ingo Roeder ; Ingmar Glauche ; Nico Scherf</creator><creatorcontrib>Helene Hoffmann ; Christoph Baldow ; Thomas Zerjatke ; Andrea Gottschalk ; Sebastian Wagner ; Elena Karg ; Sebastian Niehaus ; Ingo Roeder ; Ingmar Glauche ; Nico Scherf</creatorcontrib><description>Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</publisher><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (11), p.e0256585</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Helene Hoffmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoph Baldow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Zerjatke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea Gottschalk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elena Karg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Niehaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingo Roeder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingmar Glauche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nico Scherf</creatorcontrib><title>How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjMtKxDAUQIMgOD7-wMX9galp0qQz7kSUcT8Ld-U2uR1uTZuSpMr8vTD4Ca4OHDhHiMdaVrVu66cxrmnGUC1xpkoqY83OXIlNvddqa5XUN-I251FKo3fWbsTnIf5AibAk8uwKJAq4ZAKeIdD6RRMjrJnnExSeCDIlpgweCz7DC7g4LZiw8PelyBzYRchl9ed7cT1gyPTwxzvx8f52fD1sfcSxWxJPmM5dRO4uIqZTh6mwC9QNvXKqli0NTdugUei9ROol2qH3fbPX__n6BbKMZPo</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Helene Hoffmann</creator><creator>Christoph Baldow</creator><creator>Thomas Zerjatke</creator><creator>Andrea Gottschalk</creator><creator>Sebastian Wagner</creator><creator>Elena Karg</creator><creator>Sebastian Niehaus</creator><creator>Ingo Roeder</creator><creator>Ingmar Glauche</creator><creator>Nico Scherf</creator><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study</title><author>Helene Hoffmann ; Christoph Baldow ; Thomas Zerjatke ; Andrea Gottschalk ; Sebastian Wagner ; Elena Karg ; Sebastian Niehaus ; Ingo Roeder ; Ingmar Glauche ; Nico Scherf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Helene Hoffmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoph Baldow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Zerjatke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea Gottschalk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elena Karg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Niehaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingo Roeder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingmar Glauche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nico Scherf</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Helene Hoffmann</au><au>Christoph Baldow</au><au>Thomas Zerjatke</au><au>Andrea Gottschalk</au><au>Sebastian Wagner</au><au>Elena Karg</au><au>Sebastian Niehaus</au><au>Ingo Roeder</au><au>Ingmar Glauche</au><au>Nico Scherf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0256585</spage><pages>e0256585-</pages><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Risk stratification and treatment decisions for leukemia patients are regularly based on clinical markers determined at diagnosis, while measurements on system dynamics are often neglected. However, there is increasing evidence that linking quantitative time-course information to disease outcomes can improve the predictions for patient-specific treatment responses. We designed a synthetic experiment simulating response kinetics of 5,000 patients to compare different computational methods with respect to their ability to accurately predict relapse for chronic and acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Technically, we used clinical reference data to first fit a model and then generate de novo model simulations of individual patients' time courses for which we can systematically tune data quality (i.e. measurement error) and quantity (i.e. number of measurements). Based hereon, we compared the prediction accuracy of three different computational methods, namely mechanistic models, generalized linear models, and deep neural networks that have been fitted to the reference data. Reaching prediction accuracies between 60 and close to 100%, our results indicate that data quality has a higher impact on prediction accuracy than the specific choice of the particular method. We further show that adapted treatment and measurement schemes can considerably improve the prediction accuracy by 10 to 20%. Our proof-of-principle study highlights how computational methods and optimized data acquisition strategies can improve risk assessment and treatment of leukemia patients.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0256585</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (11), p.e0256585
issn 1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
title How to predict relapse in leukemia using time series data: A comparative in silico study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20predict%20relapse%20in%20leukemia%20using%20time%20series%20data:%20A%20comparative%20in%20silico%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Helene%20Hoffmann&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0256585&rft.pages=e0256585-&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0256585&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb49%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fb2c2107ef474a52add0aeb0a6fbdb493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true