Advancing health through evidence assisted decisions with health policy and systems research program: a qualitative evaluation of a national health research grant management process in the Philippines

• Published in: Health research policy and systems 2023-07, Vol.21 (1), p.73-73, Article 73
• Main Authors: Sales, Reneepearl Kim, Reyes-Ramos, Gladys Kaye, de Veyra, Chiqui, Gascon, Gabrielle, Barraca, Vianka, Garcia, Gillian, Yap, Maria Eufemia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accountability; Bureaucracy; Compliance; COVID-19; Data collection; Decision making; Decisions; Developing countries; Evaluation; Evaluation research; Financing, Organized; Focus Groups; Fraud; Funding; Government grants; Grant management; Grants-in-aid; Health care policy; Health Policy; Health policy and systems research; Health research; Humans; Information dissemination; LDCs; Life cycles; Management; Medical policy; Medical research; Mental health; Mental health services; Philippines; Policy making; Program evaluation; Proposals; R&D; Redesign; Research & development; Research & development expenditures; Research funding; Research governance; Research grants; Surveys; Tobacco
• ISSN: 1478-4505; 1478-4505
• DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01021-6

Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has influenced Philippine policies, including tobacco control, mental health, and COVID-19. The Department of Health (DOH) Philippines and Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD) launched the Advancing Health through Evidence-Assisted Decisions (AHEAD) with HPSR program in 2017, aiming to build a community of researchers and decision-makers committed to evidence production and utilization. Research systems employ grant management processes for transparency and accountability in research funding, preventing waste, fraud, and misuse of funds. This study evaluated AHEAD-HPSR's grant management using surveys, interviews, and focus groups to document (1) grant administration processes implemented by DOH and PCHRD, and (2) experiences of grantees, program managers, staff, and policymakers. Data were initially analyzed through the USA Grant Accountability Office's Federal Grant Life Cycle, with new themes created as they emerged. The study identified processes and gaps in the research grant life cycle stages: design/redesign, pre-award, award, implementation, closeout, and research dissemination and utilization. Identification of research areas for the grant are identified using national and departmental research priorities. While Calls for Proposals are posted publicly, researchers that have previously worked with policymakers are contacted directly to submit proposals. The evaluation found that research is delayed by bureaucracies in grant administration, particularly in financial reporting and ethics review processes. Complying with the terminal financial report was identified as the most challenging part of the grant process due to immense auditing requirements. Grantees recommend the simplification of bureaucracy for fund release to enable them to focus on research work. This study contributes to the limited literature on health research grant management in developing countries. Valuable information and recommendations were contributed by stakeholders in this evaluation. These are manifestations of a continuing interest and desire to make health policy and systems research in the Philippines more robust and relevant. It is imperative for the program to continually evolve and build systems most applicable to its multidisciplinary context.