Loading…
How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish
Resource quality is an important concept in ecology and evolution that attempts to capture the fitness benefits a resource affords to an organism. Yet “quality” is a multivariate concept, potentially affected by many variables pertaining to the resource, its surroundings, and the resource chooser. R...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and evolution 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e70146-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4826-73b4965ecc1d9ca82b2c028f808de16dd801e5dd17d13fc4c4d1decadc2f21333 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e70146 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Bose, Aneesh P. H. Brodin, Tomas Katongo, Cyprian Mabo, Lwabanya Jordan, Alex |
description | Resource quality is an important concept in ecology and evolution that attempts to capture the fitness benefits a resource affords to an organism. Yet “quality” is a multivariate concept, potentially affected by many variables pertaining to the resource, its surroundings, and the resource chooser. Researchers often use a small number of proxy variables to simplify their estimation of resource quality, but without vetting their proxies against a wider set of potential quality estimators this approach risks overlooking potentially important characteristics that can explain patterns of resource use in their study systems. Here we used Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish that utilizes empty snail shells as shelter resources, to examine how shells were used by, and partitioned among, group members in relation to a range of attributes, including shell size, intactness, texture, spatial position, and usage by heterospecifics. This approach generated a comprehensive picture of what characteristics contribute to the attractiveness and quality of each shell resource, confirming the importance of two previously proposed shell characteristics, size and intactness, but highlighting the influences of other unexplored variables, including shell spatial position and usage by heterospecifics. We also present a generally applicable “resource attractiveness index” as a means to estimate resource quality based on resource choice data. This index incorporates information from any number of resource characteristics and is of particular use when researchers wish to quantify resource value, but many characteristics jointly contribute to the value and attractiveness of the resource.
Resource quality is an important but difficult‐to‐quantify concept in ecology and evolution. Here we generate a comprehensive picture of the characteristics that contribute to the attractiveness and quality of shelter resources used by Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish. We highlight how multiple resource traits can jointly determine the quality and attractiveness of a resource, and we provide a generally applicable approach to quantifying resource quality that can be used in many study systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.70146 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fc8b79dfa993479fae4eb604612ca3d5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fc8b79dfa993479fae4eb604612ca3d5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3092367299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4826-73b4965ecc1d9ca82b2c028f808de16dd801e5dd17d13fc4c4d1decadc2f21333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9v0zAUgCMEYlPZhT8AWeKCkFr8K3FymlApbNIkLnC2HPu5deXGm50Q9b_HWbZq5YAvz3r-3qdn-xXFe4JXBGP6BTSwlcCEV6-KS4p5uRSirF-_2F8UVyntcV4VphyLt8UFawgrBRWXxXgTRqRVh0ZAB1BpiIAipDBEDehhUN71RzTuoDtlEzLOWojIdeigunyqjukafQMdutTHQfeu26K0A99n6FmRYYVS0E55ZF3avSveWOUTXD3FRfH7--bX-mZ59_PH7frr3VLzmlZLwVreVCVoTUyjVU1bqjGtbY1rA6QypsYESmOIMIRZzTU3xIBWRlNLCWNsUdzOXhPUXt5Hd1DxKINy8jER4laq2DvtQVpdt6IxVjUN46KxCji0FeYVoVoxU2bXanalEe6H9syW_NCqOAWZQBJGBMe54HouyPQBjIauj8qf1Z2fdG4nt-GPJFlQY1plw6cnQwwPA6ReHlzS4L3qIAxJMtxQVgmaW14UH_9B9_m_uvy4E1WTimIy3eHzTOkYUopgT90QLKeBktNAyceByvCHl_2f0OfxyQCZgdF5OP5HJTfrDZulfwH5_9f1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098162015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Bose, Aneesh P. H. ; Brodin, Tomas ; Katongo, Cyprian ; Mabo, Lwabanya ; Jordan, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Bose, Aneesh P. H. ; Brodin, Tomas ; Katongo, Cyprian ; Mabo, Lwabanya ; Jordan, Alex ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Resource quality is an important concept in ecology and evolution that attempts to capture the fitness benefits a resource affords to an organism. Yet “quality” is a multivariate concept, potentially affected by many variables pertaining to the resource, its surroundings, and the resource chooser. Researchers often use a small number of proxy variables to simplify their estimation of resource quality, but without vetting their proxies against a wider set of potential quality estimators this approach risks overlooking potentially important characteristics that can explain patterns of resource use in their study systems. Here we used Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish that utilizes empty snail shells as shelter resources, to examine how shells were used by, and partitioned among, group members in relation to a range of attributes, including shell size, intactness, texture, spatial position, and usage by heterospecifics. This approach generated a comprehensive picture of what characteristics contribute to the attractiveness and quality of each shell resource, confirming the importance of two previously proposed shell characteristics, size and intactness, but highlighting the influences of other unexplored variables, including shell spatial position and usage by heterospecifics. We also present a generally applicable “resource attractiveness index” as a means to estimate resource quality based on resource choice data. This index incorporates information from any number of resource characteristics and is of particular use when researchers wish to quantify resource value, but many characteristics jointly contribute to the value and attractiveness of the resource.
Resource quality is an important but difficult‐to‐quantify concept in ecology and evolution. Here we generate a comprehensive picture of the characteristics that contribute to the attractiveness and quality of shelter resources used by Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish. We highlight how multiple resource traits can jointly determine the quality and attractiveness of a resource, and we provide a generally applicable approach to quantifying resource quality that can be used in many study systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39135727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Attraction ; Behavioural Ecology ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Evolutionary Biology ; Evolutionary Ecology ; Evolutionsbiologi ; Fish ; Food quality ; Males ; niche partitioning ; Preferences ; Proxies ; resource competition ; shell dwelling ; Shells ; shelter architecture ; shelter choice ; Shelters ; social status ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e70146-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4826-73b4965ecc1d9ca82b2c028f808de16dd801e5dd17d13fc4c4d1decadc2f21333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5716-0097</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3098162015/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3098162015?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39135727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/131740$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bose, Aneesh P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodin, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katongo, Cyprian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabo, Lwabanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Resource quality is an important concept in ecology and evolution that attempts to capture the fitness benefits a resource affords to an organism. Yet “quality” is a multivariate concept, potentially affected by many variables pertaining to the resource, its surroundings, and the resource chooser. Researchers often use a small number of proxy variables to simplify their estimation of resource quality, but without vetting their proxies against a wider set of potential quality estimators this approach risks overlooking potentially important characteristics that can explain patterns of resource use in their study systems. Here we used Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish that utilizes empty snail shells as shelter resources, to examine how shells were used by, and partitioned among, group members in relation to a range of attributes, including shell size, intactness, texture, spatial position, and usage by heterospecifics. This approach generated a comprehensive picture of what characteristics contribute to the attractiveness and quality of each shell resource, confirming the importance of two previously proposed shell characteristics, size and intactness, but highlighting the influences of other unexplored variables, including shell spatial position and usage by heterospecifics. We also present a generally applicable “resource attractiveness index” as a means to estimate resource quality based on resource choice data. This index incorporates information from any number of resource characteristics and is of particular use when researchers wish to quantify resource value, but many characteristics jointly contribute to the value and attractiveness of the resource.
Resource quality is an important but difficult‐to‐quantify concept in ecology and evolution. Here we generate a comprehensive picture of the characteristics that contribute to the attractiveness and quality of shelter resources used by Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish. We highlight how multiple resource traits can jointly determine the quality and attractiveness of a resource, and we provide a generally applicable approach to quantifying resource quality that can be used in many study systems.</description><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Behavioural Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Evolutionary Ecology</subject><subject>Evolutionsbiologi</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>niche partitioning</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>resource competition</subject><subject>shell dwelling</subject><subject>Shells</subject><subject>shelter architecture</subject><subject>shelter choice</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>social status</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9v0zAUgCMEYlPZhT8AWeKCkFr8K3FymlApbNIkLnC2HPu5deXGm50Q9b_HWbZq5YAvz3r-3qdn-xXFe4JXBGP6BTSwlcCEV6-KS4p5uRSirF-_2F8UVyntcV4VphyLt8UFawgrBRWXxXgTRqRVh0ZAB1BpiIAipDBEDehhUN71RzTuoDtlEzLOWojIdeigunyqjukafQMdutTHQfeu26K0A99n6FmRYYVS0E55ZF3avSveWOUTXD3FRfH7--bX-mZ59_PH7frr3VLzmlZLwVreVCVoTUyjVU1bqjGtbY1rA6QypsYESmOIMIRZzTU3xIBWRlNLCWNsUdzOXhPUXt5Hd1DxKINy8jER4laq2DvtQVpdt6IxVjUN46KxCji0FeYVoVoxU2bXanalEe6H9syW_NCqOAWZQBJGBMe54HouyPQBjIauj8qf1Z2fdG4nt-GPJFlQY1plw6cnQwwPA6ReHlzS4L3qIAxJMtxQVgmaW14UH_9B9_m_uvy4E1WTimIy3eHzTOkYUopgT90QLKeBktNAyceByvCHl_2f0OfxyQCZgdF5OP5HJTfrDZulfwH5_9f1</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Bose, Aneesh P. H.</creator><creator>Brodin, Tomas</creator><creator>Katongo, Cyprian</creator><creator>Mabo, Lwabanya</creator><creator>Jordan, Alex</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-0097</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish</title><author>Bose, Aneesh P. H. ; Brodin, Tomas ; Katongo, Cyprian ; Mabo, Lwabanya ; Jordan, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4826-73b4965ecc1d9ca82b2c028f808de16dd801e5dd17d13fc4c4d1decadc2f21333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Behavioural Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Evolutionary Ecology</topic><topic>Evolutionsbiologi</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>niche partitioning</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>resource competition</topic><topic>shell dwelling</topic><topic>Shells</topic><topic>shelter architecture</topic><topic>shelter choice</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>social status</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bose, Aneesh P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodin, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katongo, Cyprian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabo, Lwabanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bose, Aneesh P. H.</au><au>Brodin, Tomas</au><au>Katongo, Cyprian</au><au>Mabo, Lwabanya</au><au>Jordan, Alex</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e70146</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70146-n/a</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Resource quality is an important concept in ecology and evolution that attempts to capture the fitness benefits a resource affords to an organism. Yet “quality” is a multivariate concept, potentially affected by many variables pertaining to the resource, its surroundings, and the resource chooser. Researchers often use a small number of proxy variables to simplify their estimation of resource quality, but without vetting their proxies against a wider set of potential quality estimators this approach risks overlooking potentially important characteristics that can explain patterns of resource use in their study systems. Here we used Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish that utilizes empty snail shells as shelter resources, to examine how shells were used by, and partitioned among, group members in relation to a range of attributes, including shell size, intactness, texture, spatial position, and usage by heterospecifics. This approach generated a comprehensive picture of what characteristics contribute to the attractiveness and quality of each shell resource, confirming the importance of two previously proposed shell characteristics, size and intactness, but highlighting the influences of other unexplored variables, including shell spatial position and usage by heterospecifics. We also present a generally applicable “resource attractiveness index” as a means to estimate resource quality based on resource choice data. This index incorporates information from any number of resource characteristics and is of particular use when researchers wish to quantify resource value, but many characteristics jointly contribute to the value and attractiveness of the resource.
Resource quality is an important but difficult‐to‐quantify concept in ecology and evolution. Here we generate a comprehensive picture of the characteristics that contribute to the attractiveness and quality of shelter resources used by Neolamprologus multifasciatus, a group‐living cichlid fish. We highlight how multiple resource traits can jointly determine the quality and attractiveness of a resource, and we provide a generally applicable approach to quantifying resource quality that can be used in many study systems.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39135727</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.70146</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-0097</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e70146-n/a |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fc8b79dfa993479fae4eb604612ca3d5 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Attraction Behavioural Ecology Ecology Ekologi Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Ecology Evolutionsbiologi Fish Food quality Males niche partitioning Preferences Proxies resource competition shell dwelling Shells shelter architecture shelter choice Shelters social status Zoology |
title | How can we measure resource quality when resources differ in many ways? Deconstructing shelter quality in a social fish |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A40%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20can%20we%20measure%20resource%20quality%20when%20resources%20differ%20in%20many%20ways?%20Deconstructing%20shelter%20quality%20in%20a%20social%20fish&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Bose,%20Aneesh%20P.%20H.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e70146&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70146-n/a&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.70146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3092367299%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4826-73b4965ecc1d9ca82b2c028f808de16dd801e5dd17d13fc4c4d1decadc2f21333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098162015&rft_id=info:pmid/39135727&rfr_iscdi=true |