Innovative procedure for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction from 18F-FDG first-pass ultra-sensitive digital PET/CT images: evaluation with an anthropomorphic heart phantom

• Published in: EJNMMI physics 2021-05, Vol.8 (1), p.42-42, Article 42
• Main Authors: Verrecchia-Ramos, Emilie, Morel, Olivier, Retif, Paul, Ben Mahmoud, Sinan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angiography; Anthropomorphism; Applied and Technical Physics; Automation; Bioengineering; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis; Computed tomography; Datasets; Diastole; Diffusion rate; Digital imaging; Digital PET/CT; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; Engineering; First-pass; Heart phantom; Holes; Image acquisition; Image quality; Image segmentation; Imaging; Life Sciences; LVEF; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mathematical analysis; Medical imaging; Medical Physics; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Original Research; Photon emission; Physics; Positron emission; Radioactive tracers; Radioisotopes; Radiology; Systole; Three dimensional printing; Tomography; “Pseudo-planar” PET
• ISSN: 2197-7364; 2197-7364
• DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00387-2

Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is usually measured by cine-cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), planar and single-photon emission-computerized tomography (SPECT) equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA), and echocardiography. It would be clinically useful to measure LVEF from first-pass positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radionuclide angiography, but this approach has been limited by fast radiotracer diffusion. Ultra-sensitive digital PET systems can produce high-quality images within 3-s acquisition times. This study determined whether digital PET/CT accurately measured LVEF in an anthropomorphic heart phantom under conditions mimicking radiotracer first-pass into the cardiac cavities. Methods Heart phantoms in end-diastole and end-systole were 3D-printed from a patient’s MRI dataset. Reference left ventricle end-diastole volume (EDV), end-systole volume (ESV), and LVEF were determined by phantom weights before/after water filling. PET/CT (3-s acquisitions), MRI, and planar and SPECT ERNA were performed. EDV, ESV, and/or LVEF were measured by manual and automated cardiac cavity delineation, using clinical segmentation softwares. LVEF was also measured from PET images converted to 2D “pseudo-planar” images along the short axis and horizontal long axis. LVEF was also calculated for planar ERNA images. All LVEF, ESV and EDV values were compared to the reference values assessed by weighing. Results Manually calculated 3D-PET-CT-based EDV, ESV, and LVEF were close to MRI and reference values. Automated calculations on the 3D-PET-CT dataset were unreliable, suggesting that the SPECT-based tool used for this calculation is not well adapted for PET acquisitions. Manual and automated LVEF estimations from “pseudo-planar” PET images were very close/identical to MRI and reference values. Conclusions First-pass “pseudo-planar” PET may be a promising method for estimating LVEF, easy to use in clinical practice. Processing 3D PET images is also a valid method but to date suffers from a lack of well-suited software for automated LV segmentation.