Safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

• Published in: Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2024-03, Vol.19 (1), p.140-140, Article 140
• Main Authors: Gao, Yaxuan, Luo, Hanqing, Yang, Rong, Xie, Wei, Jiang, Yi, Wang, Dongjin, Cao, Hailong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ablation; Antiarrhythmics; Apixaban; Atrial fibrillation; Bias; Cardiac arrhythmia; Care and treatment; Catheters; Clinical trials; Collaboration; Cox-Maze procedure; Effectiveness; Fibrillation; Health aspects; Heart surgery; Implantation; Inclusion; Literature reviews; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meta-analysis; Mitral valve; Mitral valve surgery; Mortality; Pacemakers; Patients; Product development; Review; Rhythm; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Software; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Systematic review; Thromboembolism
• ISSN: 1749-8090; 1749-8090
• DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02622-0

Cox-Maze procedure is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the effectiveness of the Cox-Maze procedure after concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) are not well established. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure versus no-maze procedure n in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. A systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 02, 2017) databases were performed using three databases from their inception to March 2023, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Cox-Maze procedure versus no procedure in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints. Nine RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with 663 patients in total (341 concomitant Cox-Maze with MVS and 322 MVS alone). Across all studies with included AF patients undergoing MV surgery, the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure was associated with significantly higher sinus rhythm rate at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up when compared with the no-Maze group. Results indicated that there was no significant difference between the Cox-Maze and no-Maze groups in terms of 1 year all-cause mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism. Our systematic review suggested that RCTs have demonstrated the addition of the Cox-Maze procedure for AF leads to a significantly higher rate of sinus rhythm in mitral valve surgical patients, with no increase in the rates of mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism.