Loading…

Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology

Physicians have an ethical duty to keep up-to-date with current knowledge. Professional medical associations such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support these obligations. In Europe, the costs of continuing medical education (CME) are insufficiently supported from governments and employ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista portuguesa de cardiologia 2012-07, Vol.31 (7-8), p.529-538
Main Author: ESC Board
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3
container_end_page 538
container_issue 7-8
container_start_page 529
container_title Revista portuguesa de cardiologia
container_volume 31
creator ESC Board
description Physicians have an ethical duty to keep up-to-date with current knowledge. Professional medical associations such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support these obligations. In Europe, the costs of continuing medical education (CME) are insufficiently supported from governments and employers; however, medical associations have been criticized for accepting alternative financial support from industry. Medical education and training in research include learning how to assess the quality and reliability of any information. There is some risk of bias in any form of scientific communication including intellectual, professional, and financial and it is essential that in particular, the latter must be acknowledged by full disclosure. It is essential that there is strong collaboration between basic and clinical researchers from academic institutions on the one hand, with engineers and scientists from the research divisions of device and pharmaceutical companies on the other. This is vital so that new diagnostic methods and treatments are developed. Promotion of advances by industry may accelerate their implementation into clinical practice. Universities now frequently exhort their academic staff to protect their intellectual property or commercialize their research. Thus, it is not commercial activity or links per se that have become the target for criticism but the perceived influence of commercial enterprises on clinical decision-making or on messages conveyed by professional medical organizations. This document offers the perspective of the ESC on the current debate, and it recommends how to minimize bias in scientific communications and CME and how to ensure proper ethical standards and transparency in relations between the medical profession and industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff087be3073d4d51898a3c899af0fd22</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0870255112001631</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ff087be3073d4d51898a3c899af0fd22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1024478859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CAfORAgv_s2ruIC4oKVKoEonC2JvZs4mjXDra3KA_JO-FN0h7xZaTR7_tsz3xV9ZrRJaNMvt8tI-7NklPGl1QuKVXPqkvOVL3gVNDn1SVtFV3wpmEX1XVKO1qOpKwT8mV1wblSsqbisvr7AwfILvhE1pj_IHqyj6HHlEoPBjKidaZUSCkYdybBW7JFGPLWQETivJ1Sjod3xARvMHrnNyQZhz673pnSHcfJF5tZfRQXLjs_zdzjBWinE_CBAPkeBmcO5D5DxrHYkD6GkeQtkpsphj2CJ_flOZgPJPRkBdG6MITN4VX1ooch4fW5XlW_Pt_8XH1d3H37crv6dLcwomVq0XTArW3tGjkC6xQaBe1aSEmh7WTDpVIgmDFMNvW6pyhmzhpLa5SikVZcVbcnXxtgp_fRjRAPOoDTx0aIGw0xOzOg7vuyiDUKqoStbcPargVh2q6DnvaW8-L19uRV5v57wpT16JLBYQCPYUqaUV7Xqm2brqD8hJoYUorYP13NqJ5ToXd6ToWeU6Gp1CUVRfTm7D-ty7CfJI8ZKMDHE4BlYg8Ooz7uzpTFRDS5fMn9z_8f5b3OpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024478859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>ESC Board</creator><creatorcontrib>ESC Board ; ESC Board</creatorcontrib><description>Physicians have an ethical duty to keep up-to-date with current knowledge. Professional medical associations such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support these obligations. In Europe, the costs of continuing medical education (CME) are insufficiently supported from governments and employers; however, medical associations have been criticized for accepting alternative financial support from industry. Medical education and training in research include learning how to assess the quality and reliability of any information. There is some risk of bias in any form of scientific communication including intellectual, professional, and financial and it is essential that in particular, the latter must be acknowledged by full disclosure. It is essential that there is strong collaboration between basic and clinical researchers from academic institutions on the one hand, with engineers and scientists from the research divisions of device and pharmaceutical companies on the other. This is vital so that new diagnostic methods and treatments are developed. Promotion of advances by industry may accelerate their implementation into clinical practice. Universities now frequently exhort their academic staff to protect their intellectual property or commercialize their research. Thus, it is not commercial activity or links per se that have become the target for criticism but the perceived influence of commercial enterprises on clinical decision-making or on messages conveyed by professional medical organizations. This document offers the perspective of the ESC on the current debate, and it recommends how to minimize bias in scientific communications and CME and how to ensure proper ethical standards and transparency in relations between the medical profession and industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0870-2551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2174-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22776403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Portugal: Elsevier España</publisher><subject>CME ; Communication ; Education, Medical, Continuing - standards ; Europe ; Health Care Sector ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Scientific communications</subject><ispartof>Revista portuguesa de cardiologia, 2012-07, Vol.31 (7-8), p.529-538</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier España.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255112001631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ESC Board</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESC Board</creatorcontrib><title>Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology</title><title>Revista portuguesa de cardiologia</title><addtitle>Rev Port Cardiol</addtitle><description>Physicians have an ethical duty to keep up-to-date with current knowledge. Professional medical associations such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support these obligations. In Europe, the costs of continuing medical education (CME) are insufficiently supported from governments and employers; however, medical associations have been criticized for accepting alternative financial support from industry. Medical education and training in research include learning how to assess the quality and reliability of any information. There is some risk of bias in any form of scientific communication including intellectual, professional, and financial and it is essential that in particular, the latter must be acknowledged by full disclosure. It is essential that there is strong collaboration between basic and clinical researchers from academic institutions on the one hand, with engineers and scientists from the research divisions of device and pharmaceutical companies on the other. This is vital so that new diagnostic methods and treatments are developed. Promotion of advances by industry may accelerate their implementation into clinical practice. Universities now frequently exhort their academic staff to protect their intellectual property or commercialize their research. Thus, it is not commercial activity or links per se that have become the target for criticism but the perceived influence of commercial enterprises on clinical decision-making or on messages conveyed by professional medical organizations. This document offers the perspective of the ESC on the current debate, and it recommends how to minimize bias in scientific communications and CME and how to ensure proper ethical standards and transparency in relations between the medical profession and industry.</description><subject>CME</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing - standards</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Health Care Sector</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Scientific communications</subject><issn>0870-2551</issn><issn>2174-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CAfORAgv_s2ruIC4oKVKoEonC2JvZs4mjXDra3KA_JO-FN0h7xZaTR7_tsz3xV9ZrRJaNMvt8tI-7NklPGl1QuKVXPqkvOVL3gVNDn1SVtFV3wpmEX1XVKO1qOpKwT8mV1wblSsqbisvr7AwfILvhE1pj_IHqyj6HHlEoPBjKidaZUSCkYdybBW7JFGPLWQETivJ1Sjod3xARvMHrnNyQZhz673pnSHcfJF5tZfRQXLjs_zdzjBWinE_CBAPkeBmcO5D5DxrHYkD6GkeQtkpsphj2CJ_flOZgPJPRkBdG6MITN4VX1ooch4fW5XlW_Pt_8XH1d3H37crv6dLcwomVq0XTArW3tGjkC6xQaBe1aSEmh7WTDpVIgmDFMNvW6pyhmzhpLa5SikVZcVbcnXxtgp_fRjRAPOoDTx0aIGw0xOzOg7vuyiDUKqoStbcPargVh2q6DnvaW8-L19uRV5v57wpT16JLBYQCPYUqaUV7Xqm2brqD8hJoYUorYP13NqJ5ToXd6ToWeU6Gp1CUVRfTm7D-ty7CfJI8ZKMDHE4BlYg8Ooz7uzpTFRDS5fMn9z_8f5b3OpQ</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>ESC Board</creator><general>Elsevier España</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology</title><author>ESC Board</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>CME</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing - standards</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Health Care Sector</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Scientific communications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ESC Board</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESC Board</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista portuguesa de cardiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ESC Board</au><aucorp>ESC Board</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology</atitle><jtitle>Revista portuguesa de cardiologia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Port Cardiol</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>529-538</pages><issn>0870-2551</issn><eissn>2174-2030</eissn><abstract>Physicians have an ethical duty to keep up-to-date with current knowledge. Professional medical associations such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support these obligations. In Europe, the costs of continuing medical education (CME) are insufficiently supported from governments and employers; however, medical associations have been criticized for accepting alternative financial support from industry. Medical education and training in research include learning how to assess the quality and reliability of any information. There is some risk of bias in any form of scientific communication including intellectual, professional, and financial and it is essential that in particular, the latter must be acknowledged by full disclosure. It is essential that there is strong collaboration between basic and clinical researchers from academic institutions on the one hand, with engineers and scientists from the research divisions of device and pharmaceutical companies on the other. This is vital so that new diagnostic methods and treatments are developed. Promotion of advances by industry may accelerate their implementation into clinical practice. Universities now frequently exhort their academic staff to protect their intellectual property or commercialize their research. Thus, it is not commercial activity or links per se that have become the target for criticism but the perceived influence of commercial enterprises on clinical decision-making or on messages conveyed by professional medical organizations. This document offers the perspective of the ESC on the current debate, and it recommends how to minimize bias in scientific communications and CME and how to ensure proper ethical standards and transparency in relations between the medical profession and industry.</abstract><cop>Portugal</cop><pub>Elsevier España</pub><pmid>22776403</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0870-2551
ispartof Revista portuguesa de cardiologia, 2012-07, Vol.31 (7-8), p.529-538
issn 0870-2551
2174-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff087be3073d4d51898a3c899af0fd22
source ScienceDirect
subjects CME
Communication
Education, Medical, Continuing - standards
Europe
Health Care Sector
Humans
Interprofessional Relations
Scientific communications
title Relations between professional medical associations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuing medical education: a Policy Statement from the European Society of Cardiology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T03%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relations%20between%20professional%20medical%20associations%20and%20healthcare%20industry,%20concerning%20scientific%20communication%20and%20continuing%20medical%20education:%20a%20Policy%20Statement%20from%20the%20European%20Society%20of%20Cardiology&rft.jtitle=Revista%20portuguesa%20de%20cardiologia&rft.au=ESC%20Board&rft.aucorp=ESC%20Board&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=529-538&rft.issn=0870-2551&rft.eissn=2174-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1024478859%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3817-59a2dd8dbe2ea197ec7a8b3660a89652677a31cc1654bf0e3e2eadcd04e6356d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024478859&rft_id=info:pmid/22776403&rfr_iscdi=true