Differences between two populations of bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with variable measurements of laboratory susceptibilities to Bt toxins exposed to non-Bt and Bt cottons in large field cages

• Published in: PloS one 2019-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e0212567-e0212567
• Main Authors: Little, Nathan S, Elkins, Blake H, Mullen, R Michelle, Perera, Omaththage P, Parys, Katherine A, Allen, K Clint, Boykin, Deborah L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Animals; Bacterial Proteins - biosynthesis; Bacterial Proteins - genetics; Biology and Life Sciences; Containers; Crystalline lens; Endotoxins - biosynthesis; Endotoxins - genetics; Genetically modified crops; Gossypium - genetics; Gossypium - metabolism; Gossypium - parasitology; Insects; Lepidoptera - growth & development; Measurement; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pest Control, Biological; Plants, Genetically Modified - genetics; Plants, Genetically Modified - metabolism; Plants, Genetically Modified - parasitology; Zea mays - genetics; Zea mays - metabolism; Zea mays - parasitology
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212567

Interpreting variable laboratory measurements of Helicoverpa zea Boddie susceptibility to toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) has been challenging due to a lack of clear evidence to document declining field control. Research that links laboratory measurements of susceptibility to survival on Bt crops is vital for accurate characterization and any subsequent response to the occurrence of an implied H. zea resistance event. In this study, H. zea survival and the resultant damage to plant fruiting structures of non-Bt, Bollgard II, and Bollgard III cottons from two insect colonies with differing levels of laboratory susceptibility to Bt toxins were evaluated in large field cages. Laboratory bioassays revealed resistance ratios of 2.04 and 622.14 between the two H. zea colonies for Dipel DF and Cry1Ac, respectively. Differences between the two H. zea colonies measured via bioassays with Bollgard II and Bollgard III cotton leaf tissue in the laboratory were not statistically discernable. However, there was 17.6% and 5.3% lower larval mortality in Bollgard II and Bollgard III for the feral relative to the laboratory colony of H. zea, respectively. Although H. zea larval numbers in cages infested with the laboratory susceptible colony did not differ between the two Bt cottons, there were fewer larvae per 25 plants in Bollgard III than in Bollgard II cotton in cages containing tolerant insects. Cages infested with tolerant H. zea moths had higher numbers of total larvae than those containing the laboratory susceptible colony in both Bollgard II and Bollgard III cottons. Bollgard II and Bollgard III cottons received 77.4% and 82.7% more total damage to total plant fruiting structures in cages infested with tolerant insects relative to those containing the laboratory susceptible colony. The damage inflicted to fruiting structures on Bollgard III cotton by a feral H. zea colony with decreased measurements of laboratory susceptibility to Dipel DF and Cry1Ac indicate that the addition of Vip3A to third generation Bt cottons may not provide sufficient control in situations where infestations levels are high.