Loading…
Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients
Introduction A care conundrum for low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients in which they face financial burden after not qualifying for an inpatient stay of 3 days or more has been noted in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that lead to inpatient length of stay (IP LO...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation 2023-11, Vol.14, p.21514593231216390-21514593231216390 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ee916d729aa50cda7b608c8e91f68dd122a513af1dbfc4fd9e0153ed280675923 |
container_end_page | 21514593231216390 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 21514593231216390 |
container_title | Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Abernathy, Bailey R. Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A. Rivard, Rachael L. Schroder, Lisa K. Switzer, Julie A. |
description | Introduction
A care conundrum for low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients in which they face financial burden after not qualifying for an inpatient stay of 3 days or more has been noted in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that lead to inpatient length of stay (IP LOS) ≥3 days in older adults with nonoperative pelvic ring fragility fractures and to highlight the challenging financial decision-making of those with IP LOS |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/21514593231216390 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff8da576bbdd4f4abe4b83cf7846af12</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21514593231216390</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ff8da576bbdd4f4abe4b83cf7846af12</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2920194525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ee916d729aa50cda7b608c8e91f68dd122a513af1dbfc4fd9e0153ed280675923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgdRsNT-AO8C3ngzbb4_vFuWrRYWWopeh0xysmaZnazJTGv_vTNdUVHMxUl4ed735HCa5i3Bl4QodUWJIFwYRhmhRDKDXzRni9Yu4ss_3q-bi1r3eD5cMibUWZM234-5pmGHxq-A1q7MJQ_TEMp0QDmibX5sNwOU3RO6g_4heXS_wNfF-XEqUFEa0G0foKBVmPqxfkArdA8PCR4XN6MU3bkxwTDWN82r6PoKFz_v8-bL9ebz-lO7vf14s15tW8-xHFsAQ2RQ1DgnsA9OdRJrr2c1Sh0CodQJwlwkoYuex2AAE8EgUI2lEoay8-bmlBuy29tjSQdXnmx2yT4LueysK2PyPdgYdXBCya4LgUfuOuCdZj4qzeXcYcl6f8o6lvxtgjraQ6oe-t4NkKdqqTZCYYI1mdF3f6H7PJVhntRSQzExXFAxU-RE-ZJrLRB_fZBgu-zS_rPL2XN58lS3g9-p_zf8ALdLnE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920194525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Abernathy, Bailey R. ; Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A. ; Rivard, Rachael L. ; Schroder, Lisa K. ; Switzer, Julie A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, Bailey R. ; Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A. ; Rivard, Rachael L. ; Schroder, Lisa K. ; Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
A care conundrum for low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients in which they face financial burden after not qualifying for an inpatient stay of 3 days or more has been noted in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that lead to inpatient length of stay (IP LOS) ≥3 days in older adults with nonoperative pelvic ring fragility fractures and to highlight the challenging financial decision-making of those with IP LOS <3 days in the context of the Medicare 3-day rule.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of 322 patients aged ≥65 presenting from March 2016 and February 2019 to either of 2 emergency departments (EDs) after a ground-level fall resulting in a pelvic ring fracture. Patient demographic, IP LOS, and mortality data were extracted. Case management notes were analyzed to summarize financial decision-making for patients with IP LOS <3 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that predicted IP LOS ≥3 days and mortality.
Results
IP LOS ≥3 days was associated with presentation to level I hospital (OR .30 [.19, 0.50]) and being single (OR 2.50 [1.10, 5.68]). 70.3% required a post-acute skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay. Of patients with LOS <3 days, 25.0% were financially responsible for their SNF stay, while 7.9% elected home care due to financial reasons. Overall 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.5%, 8.1%, and 20.8%, respectively. For patients with LOS <3 days, returning to assisted living compared to discharging to a SNF increased 90-day mortality risk (HR 8.529, P = .0451). Having Medicare trended towards increased 90-day mortality risk compared to commercial insurance (HR 4.556, P = .0544).
Conclusion
The current system is failing older adult patients who sustain nonoperative low-energy pelvic ring fractures in terms of financial coverage of necessary post-acute treatment. This care conundrum has yet to be solved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4593</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21514593231216390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Medicare ; Mortality ; Older people</subject><ispartof>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2023-11, Vol.14, p.21514593231216390-21514593231216390</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ee916d729aa50cda7b608c8e91f68dd122a513af1dbfc4fd9e0153ed280675923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21514593231216390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920194525?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,44945,45333</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, Bailey R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Rachael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Lisa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients</title><title>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation</title><description>Introduction
A care conundrum for low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients in which they face financial burden after not qualifying for an inpatient stay of 3 days or more has been noted in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that lead to inpatient length of stay (IP LOS) ≥3 days in older adults with nonoperative pelvic ring fragility fractures and to highlight the challenging financial decision-making of those with IP LOS <3 days in the context of the Medicare 3-day rule.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of 322 patients aged ≥65 presenting from March 2016 and February 2019 to either of 2 emergency departments (EDs) after a ground-level fall resulting in a pelvic ring fracture. Patient demographic, IP LOS, and mortality data were extracted. Case management notes were analyzed to summarize financial decision-making for patients with IP LOS <3 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that predicted IP LOS ≥3 days and mortality.
Results
IP LOS ≥3 days was associated with presentation to level I hospital (OR .30 [.19, 0.50]) and being single (OR 2.50 [1.10, 5.68]). 70.3% required a post-acute skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay. Of patients with LOS <3 days, 25.0% were financially responsible for their SNF stay, while 7.9% elected home care due to financial reasons. Overall 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.5%, 8.1%, and 20.8%, respectively. For patients with LOS <3 days, returning to assisted living compared to discharging to a SNF increased 90-day mortality risk (HR 8.529, P = .0451). Having Medicare trended towards increased 90-day mortality risk compared to commercial insurance (HR 4.556, P = .0544).
Conclusion
The current system is failing older adult patients who sustain nonoperative low-energy pelvic ring fractures in terms of financial coverage of necessary post-acute treatment. This care conundrum has yet to be solved.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Older people</subject><issn>2151-4593</issn><issn>2151-4585</issn><issn>2151-4593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgdRsNT-AO8C3ngzbb4_vFuWrRYWWopeh0xysmaZnazJTGv_vTNdUVHMxUl4ed735HCa5i3Bl4QodUWJIFwYRhmhRDKDXzRni9Yu4ss_3q-bi1r3eD5cMibUWZM234-5pmGHxq-A1q7MJQ_TEMp0QDmibX5sNwOU3RO6g_4heXS_wNfF-XEqUFEa0G0foKBVmPqxfkArdA8PCR4XN6MU3bkxwTDWN82r6PoKFz_v8-bL9ebz-lO7vf14s15tW8-xHFsAQ2RQ1DgnsA9OdRJrr2c1Sh0CodQJwlwkoYuex2AAE8EgUI2lEoay8-bmlBuy29tjSQdXnmx2yT4LueysK2PyPdgYdXBCya4LgUfuOuCdZj4qzeXcYcl6f8o6lvxtgjraQ6oe-t4NkKdqqTZCYYI1mdF3f6H7PJVhntRSQzExXFAxU-RE-ZJrLRB_fZBgu-zS_rPL2XN58lS3g9-p_zf8ALdLnE8</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Abernathy, Bailey R.</creator><creator>Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A.</creator><creator>Rivard, Rachael L.</creator><creator>Schroder, Lisa K.</creator><creator>Switzer, Julie A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients</title><author>Abernathy, Bailey R. ; Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A. ; Rivard, Rachael L. ; Schroder, Lisa K. ; Switzer, Julie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ee916d729aa50cda7b608c8e91f68dd122a513af1dbfc4fd9e0153ed280675923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Older people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, Bailey R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, Rachael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Lisa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abernathy, Bailey R.</au><au>Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A.</au><au>Rivard, Rachael L.</au><au>Schroder, Lisa K.</au><au>Switzer, Julie A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients</atitle><jtitle>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>21514593231216390</spage><epage>21514593231216390</epage><pages>21514593231216390-21514593231216390</pages><issn>2151-4593</issn><issn>2151-4585</issn><eissn>2151-4593</eissn><abstract>Introduction
A care conundrum for low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients in which they face financial burden after not qualifying for an inpatient stay of 3 days or more has been noted in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that lead to inpatient length of stay (IP LOS) ≥3 days in older adults with nonoperative pelvic ring fragility fractures and to highlight the challenging financial decision-making of those with IP LOS <3 days in the context of the Medicare 3-day rule.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of 322 patients aged ≥65 presenting from March 2016 and February 2019 to either of 2 emergency departments (EDs) after a ground-level fall resulting in a pelvic ring fracture. Patient demographic, IP LOS, and mortality data were extracted. Case management notes were analyzed to summarize financial decision-making for patients with IP LOS <3 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that predicted IP LOS ≥3 days and mortality.
Results
IP LOS ≥3 days was associated with presentation to level I hospital (OR .30 [.19, 0.50]) and being single (OR 2.50 [1.10, 5.68]). 70.3% required a post-acute skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay. Of patients with LOS <3 days, 25.0% were financially responsible for their SNF stay, while 7.9% elected home care due to financial reasons. Overall 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.5%, 8.1%, and 20.8%, respectively. For patients with LOS <3 days, returning to assisted living compared to discharging to a SNF increased 90-day mortality risk (HR 8.529, P = .0451). Having Medicare trended towards increased 90-day mortality risk compared to commercial insurance (HR 4.556, P = .0544).
Conclusion
The current system is failing older adult patients who sustain nonoperative low-energy pelvic ring fractures in terms of financial coverage of necessary post-acute treatment. This care conundrum has yet to be solved.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/21514593231216390</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-1643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2151-4593 |
ispartof | Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2023-11, Vol.14, p.21514593231216390-21514593231216390 |
issn | 2151-4593 2151-4585 2151-4593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff8da576bbdd4f4abe4b83cf7846af12 |
source | PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Decision making Medicare Mortality Older people |
title | Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposing%20the%20Care%20Conundrum%20of%20Low-Energy%20Pelvic%20Ring%20Fractures%20in%20Older%20Adults:%20A%20Review%20of%20322%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Geriatric%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Abernathy,%20Bailey%20R.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=21514593231216390&rft.epage=21514593231216390&rft.pages=21514593231216390-21514593231216390&rft.issn=2151-4593&rft.eissn=2151-4593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21514593231216390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2920194525%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ee916d729aa50cda7b608c8e91f68dd122a513af1dbfc4fd9e0153ed280675923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920194525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21514593231216390&rfr_iscdi=true |