Loading…
The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa
Social capital has become a critical issue in agricultural development as it plays an important role in collective action, such as, management of common resources and collective marketing. Whilst literature exists on the role of social capital in the use and adoption of improved agricultural technol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and society 2008-12, Vol.13 (2), p.9, Article art9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7c8dd009fc24a6b9bb6a91bd18e20359399326dc34262a3ae22505baa39398423 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Ecology and society |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Njuki, Jemimah M. Mapila, Mariam T. Zingore, Shamie Delve, Robert |
description | Social capital has become a critical issue in agricultural development as it plays an important role in collective action, such as, management of common resources and collective marketing. Whilst literature exists on the role of social capital in the use and adoption of improved agricultural technology, such literature is fraught with issues of the measurement of social capital beyond membership of farmers in groups. We hypothesized that different types of social capital influence the adoption of soil management options differently. This study looked at the measurement of social capital, differentiating between the main types of social capital and employed factor analysis to aggregate indicators of social capital into bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Using logit analysis, the role of these types of capitals on influencing use of different soil management options was analyzed. The study found that bonding, bridging, and linking social capital all influence the adoption and use of different soil management options differently, a trend that might be similar for other agricultural technologies as well. The study recommends more research investments in understanding the differentiated outcomes of these forms of social capital on use and adoption of technologies to further guide agricultural interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5751/es-02539-130209 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff939567d73d4152b073d7c6e162eb3c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26267960</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ff939567d73d4152b073d7c6e162eb3c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>26267960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7c8dd009fc24a6b9bb6a91bd18e20359399326dc34262a3ae22505baa39398423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv3CAQha2qlZqmPfdUCfXQmxsYDJhjtE3blVLlkM0ZjTHeYHlhC_Zh_33YOIqqisOMmO89GL2q-szod6EEu3K5piC4rhmnQPWb6oIp2tacturtP_376kPOI6WgmxYuqtPu0ZEfp4AHbzOJA7mP1uNENnj0c6k-kG0YpsUF68OePGS3Qn4ifzDg3h1cmMndcfYx5DM9F7_Now8nDCOSXfIY9tOLaCnDFMj1kLzFj9W7AafsPr3Uy-rh581u87u-vfu13Vzf1rZRzVwr2_Y9pXqw0KDsdNdJ1KzrWeuAcqG51hxkb3kDEpCjAxBUdIi8jNoG-GW1XX37iKM5Jn_AdDIRvXm-iGlvMM3eTs4MQ9EIqXrF-4YJ6GhplJWOSXAdt8Xr2-p1TPHv4vJsDj5bN00YXFyyAdq0QsD50a__gWNcUih7GgAqoBxVoKsVsinmnNzw-jtGzTlTc3NvnjM1a6ZF8WVVjHmO6RUvm0ulJeVPHIicWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220525257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Njuki, Jemimah M. ; Mapila, Mariam T. ; Zingore, Shamie ; Delve, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Njuki, Jemimah M. ; Mapila, Mariam T. ; Zingore, Shamie ; Delve, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Social capital has become a critical issue in agricultural development as it plays an important role in collective action, such as, management of common resources and collective marketing. Whilst literature exists on the role of social capital in the use and adoption of improved agricultural technology, such literature is fraught with issues of the measurement of social capital beyond membership of farmers in groups. We hypothesized that different types of social capital influence the adoption of soil management options differently. This study looked at the measurement of social capital, differentiating between the main types of social capital and employed factor analysis to aggregate indicators of social capital into bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Using logit analysis, the role of these types of capitals on influencing use of different soil management options was analyzed. The study found that bonding, bridging, and linking social capital all influence the adoption and use of different soil management options differently, a trend that might be similar for other agricultural technologies as well. The study recommends more research investments in understanding the differentiated outcomes of these forms of social capital on use and adoption of technologies to further guide agricultural interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-3087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5751/es-02539-130209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Resilience Alliance</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agroecology ; Agroforestry ; Crop management ; Crop rotation ; Crops ; Environmental management ; Farmers ; gender ; smallholder farmers ; Social capital ; Soil fertility ; soil management ; Soil resource management ; Soils ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Ecology and society, 2008-12, Vol.13 (2), p.9, Article art9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Resilience Alliance 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7c8dd009fc24a6b9bb6a91bd18e20359399326dc34262a3ae22505baa39398423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26267960$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26267960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,25345,27857,27915,27916,54515,54521,58229,58462</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Njuki, Jemimah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapila, Mariam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zingore, Shamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delve, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa</title><title>Ecology and society</title><description>Social capital has become a critical issue in agricultural development as it plays an important role in collective action, such as, management of common resources and collective marketing. Whilst literature exists on the role of social capital in the use and adoption of improved agricultural technology, such literature is fraught with issues of the measurement of social capital beyond membership of farmers in groups. We hypothesized that different types of social capital influence the adoption of soil management options differently. This study looked at the measurement of social capital, differentiating between the main types of social capital and employed factor analysis to aggregate indicators of social capital into bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Using logit analysis, the role of these types of capitals on influencing use of different soil management options was analyzed. The study found that bonding, bridging, and linking social capital all influence the adoption and use of different soil management options differently, a trend that might be similar for other agricultural technologies as well. The study recommends more research investments in understanding the differentiated outcomes of these forms of social capital on use and adoption of technologies to further guide agricultural interventions.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>gender</subject><subject>smallholder farmers</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>soil management</subject><subject>Soil resource management</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1708-3087</issn><issn>1708-3087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv3CAQha2qlZqmPfdUCfXQmxsYDJhjtE3blVLlkM0ZjTHeYHlhC_Zh_33YOIqqisOMmO89GL2q-szod6EEu3K5piC4rhmnQPWb6oIp2tacturtP_376kPOI6WgmxYuqtPu0ZEfp4AHbzOJA7mP1uNENnj0c6k-kG0YpsUF68OePGS3Qn4ifzDg3h1cmMndcfYx5DM9F7_Now8nDCOSXfIY9tOLaCnDFMj1kLzFj9W7AafsPr3Uy-rh581u87u-vfu13Vzf1rZRzVwr2_Y9pXqw0KDsdNdJ1KzrWeuAcqG51hxkb3kDEpCjAxBUdIi8jNoG-GW1XX37iKM5Jn_AdDIRvXm-iGlvMM3eTs4MQ9EIqXrF-4YJ6GhplJWOSXAdt8Xr2-p1TPHv4vJsDj5bN00YXFyyAdq0QsD50a__gWNcUih7GgAqoBxVoKsVsinmnNzw-jtGzTlTc3NvnjM1a6ZF8WVVjHmO6RUvm0ulJeVPHIicWg</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Njuki, Jemimah M.</creator><creator>Mapila, Mariam T.</creator><creator>Zingore, Shamie</creator><creator>Delve, Robert</creator><general>Resilience Alliance</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>H9R</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa</title><author>Njuki, Jemimah M. ; Mapila, Mariam T. ; Zingore, Shamie ; Delve, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7c8dd009fc24a6b9bb6a91bd18e20359399326dc34262a3ae22505baa39398423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>gender</topic><topic>smallholder farmers</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>soil management</topic><topic>Soil resource management</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Njuki, Jemimah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapila, Mariam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zingore, Shamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delve, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Illustrata: Natural Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Njuki, Jemimah M.</au><au>Mapila, Mariam T.</au><au>Zingore, Shamie</au><au>Delve, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and society</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><artnum>art9</artnum><issn>1708-3087</issn><eissn>1708-3087</eissn><abstract>Social capital has become a critical issue in agricultural development as it plays an important role in collective action, such as, management of common resources and collective marketing. Whilst literature exists on the role of social capital in the use and adoption of improved agricultural technology, such literature is fraught with issues of the measurement of social capital beyond membership of farmers in groups. We hypothesized that different types of social capital influence the adoption of soil management options differently. This study looked at the measurement of social capital, differentiating between the main types of social capital and employed factor analysis to aggregate indicators of social capital into bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Using logit analysis, the role of these types of capitals on influencing use of different soil management options was analyzed. The study found that bonding, bridging, and linking social capital all influence the adoption and use of different soil management options differently, a trend that might be similar for other agricultural technologies as well. The study recommends more research investments in understanding the differentiated outcomes of these forms of social capital on use and adoption of technologies to further guide agricultural interventions.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Resilience Alliance</pub><doi>10.5751/es-02539-130209</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1708-3087 |
ispartof | Ecology and society, 2008-12, Vol.13 (2), p.9, Article art9 |
issn | 1708-3087 1708-3087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff939567d73d4152b073d7c6e162eb3c |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Agricultural land Agriculture Agroecology Agroforestry Crop management Crop rotation Crops Environmental management Farmers gender smallholder farmers Social capital Soil fertility soil management Soil resource management Soils Sustainable agriculture |
title | The Dynamics of Social Capital in Influencing Use of Soil Management Options in the Chinyanja Triangle of Southern Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Dynamics%20of%20Social%20Capital%20in%20Influencing%20Use%20of%20Soil%20Management%20Options%20in%20the%20Chinyanja%20Triangle%20of%20Southern%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20society&rft.au=Njuki,%20Jemimah%20M.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.artnum=art9&rft.issn=1708-3087&rft.eissn=1708-3087&rft_id=info:doi/10.5751/es-02539-130209&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E26267960%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-7c8dd009fc24a6b9bb6a91bd18e20359399326dc34262a3ae22505baa39398423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220525257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26267960&rfr_iscdi=true |