A novel COVID-19 program, delivering vaccines throughout rural and remote Australia

The Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (RFDS) established a unique SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program for vaccinating Australians that live in rural and remote areas. This paper describes the preparation and response phases of the RFDS response. This study includes vaccinations conducted by the RF...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in public health 2023-07, Vol.11, p.1019536-1019536
Main Authors: Gardiner, Fergus W, Schofield, Zoe, Hendry, Miranda, Jones, Kate, Smallacombe, Mandy, Steere, Mardi, Beach, Jenny, MacIsaac, MaryBeth, Greenberg, Randall, Crawford, Candice, Trivett, Melanie, Morris, Judah, Spring, Breeanna, Quinlan, Frank, Churilov, Leonid, Rallah-Baker, Kris, Gardiner, Elli, O'Donnell, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
community
COVID-19
engagement
Public Health
remote
vaccination
vaccine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (RFDS) established a unique SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program for vaccinating Australians that live in rural and remote areas. This paper describes the preparation and response phases of the RFDS response. This study includes vaccinations conducted by the RFDS from 01 January 2021 until 31 December 2021 when vaccines were mandatory for work and social activities. Prior to each clinic, we conducted community consultation to determine site requirements, patient characteristics, expected vaccination numbers, and community transmission rates. Ninety-five organizations requested support. The majority (  = 60; 63.2%) came from Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organizations. Following consultation, 360 communities were approved for support. Actual vaccinations exceeded expectations (  = 70,827 vs. 49,407), with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83, 0.93). Areas that reported healthcare workforce shortages during the preparation phase had the highest population proportion difference between expected and actual vaccinations. Areas that reported high vaccine hesitancy during the preparation phase had fewer than expected vaccines. There was a noticeable increase in vaccination rates in line with community outbreaks and positive polymerase chain reaction cases [ (41) = 0.35,  = 0.021]. Engagement with community leaders prior to clinic deployment was essential to provide a tailored response based on community expectations.
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1019536