Loading…

Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy

Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181
Main Authors: Choudhary, Jasmeen, Mahajan, Rajesh, Mahajan, Arti, Gulati, Smriti, Mehta, Anjali, Nazir, Robina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3
container_end_page 181
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
container_volume 35
creator Choudhary, Jasmeen
Mahajan, Rajesh
Mahajan, Arti
Gulati, Smriti
Mehta, Anjali
Nazir, Robina
description Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed. Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A592001487</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A592001487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1r2zAUhs3YWLtuf2AXwzAYu0mmD8u2bgYh--oodBfbboWsj1iJreNKdkP-3H7blKQtDYxhgcWr57zyOX6z7DVG8wIj-mENUg3z79eL5Q9BaSFw9SQ7J4TiGakoepqdI16hGcc1O8texLhGiKGKsOfZGcUU0Qqx8-zPEvpBBhfB52Dzy9_5KkjvohlDUqTXe2mQHXi409JqTQ9652XvVDww0fgIYXfY9zBCyJsO1CaXdjQhj4PzskuHJo6tiU7mWze2ebsbTGjS3SpvpsHdSiWdN7nz6b7RGT_GfPLahBU4v8plo6E_-LS7mFyNGqHfvcyeWdlF8-rufZH9-vL55_Lb7Or66-VycTVTJanirCZGclQZy0tMmrLgDUdSMSytJgVntbWMV0VJaE0arImusbZIaYQ45RXXll5kl0dfDXIthuB6GXYCpBMHAcJKyDA61RlhrbaYM8UJRQVmqmGG20JXpkw7VZXJ6-PRa5ia3miVOg2yOzE9PfGuFSu4FSXjNatZMnh_ZxDgZkpDFb2LynRdmjBMURDCaswITf1cZG-P6EqmT3PeQnJUe1wsGCcI4aKuEjX_B5UebdIvBm-sS_pJwbtHBa2R3dhG6KbRgY-nIDmCKkCMwdiHNjES-xCLQ4jF4xCnojePB_RQcp_aBHw6AlvoUhTippu2JojEbjxs_2OdVinuE0__AsuUC-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258152362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</creator><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed. Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31303705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Bupivacaine ; Comparative analysis ; granisetron ; Hysterectomy ; Original ; Palonosetron ; Phenols (Class of compounds) ; spinal anesthesia ; Surgery ; Women ; Women's health</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598585/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598585/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27439,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Arti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Smriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Anjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed. Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>granisetron</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Palonosetron</subject><subject>Phenols (Class of compounds)</subject><subject>spinal anesthesia</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1r2zAUhs3YWLtuf2AXwzAYu0mmD8u2bgYh--oodBfbboWsj1iJreNKdkP-3H7blKQtDYxhgcWr57zyOX6z7DVG8wIj-mENUg3z79eL5Q9BaSFw9SQ7J4TiGakoepqdI16hGcc1O8texLhGiKGKsOfZGcUU0Qqx8-zPEvpBBhfB52Dzy9_5KkjvohlDUqTXe2mQHXi409JqTQ9652XvVDww0fgIYXfY9zBCyJsO1CaXdjQhj4PzskuHJo6tiU7mWze2ebsbTGjS3SpvpsHdSiWdN7nz6b7RGT_GfPLahBU4v8plo6E_-LS7mFyNGqHfvcyeWdlF8-rufZH9-vL55_Lb7Or66-VycTVTJanirCZGclQZy0tMmrLgDUdSMSytJgVntbWMV0VJaE0arImusbZIaYQ45RXXll5kl0dfDXIthuB6GXYCpBMHAcJKyDA61RlhrbaYM8UJRQVmqmGG20JXpkw7VZXJ6-PRa5ia3miVOg2yOzE9PfGuFSu4FSXjNatZMnh_ZxDgZkpDFb2LynRdmjBMURDCaswITf1cZG-P6EqmT3PeQnJUe1wsGCcI4aKuEjX_B5UebdIvBm-sS_pJwbtHBa2R3dhG6KbRgY-nIDmCKkCMwdiHNjES-xCLQ4jF4xCnojePB_RQcp_aBHw6AlvoUhTippu2JojEbjxs_2OdVinuE0__AsuUC-Y</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creator><creator>Mahajan, Rajesh</creator><creator>Mahajan, Arti</creator><creator>Gulati, Smriti</creator><creator>Mehta, Anjali</creator><creator>Nazir, Robina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><author>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>granisetron</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Palonosetron</topic><topic>Phenols (Class of compounds)</topic><topic>spinal anesthesia</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Arti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Smriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Anjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choudhary, Jasmeen</au><au>Mahajan, Rajesh</au><au>Mahajan, Arti</au><au>Gulati, Smriti</au><au>Mehta, Anjali</au><au>Nazir, Robina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>176-181</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed. Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>31303705</pmid><doi>10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0970-9185
ispartof Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181
issn 0970-9185
2231-2730
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesia
Bupivacaine
Comparative analysis
granisetron
Hysterectomy
Original
Palonosetron
Phenols (Class of compounds)
spinal anesthesia
Surgery
Women
Women's health
title Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20IV%20granisetron%20and%20IV%20palonosetron%20on%20hemodynamics%20and%20sensory%20and%20motor%20block%20after%20spinal%20anesthesia%20with%20hyperbaric%20bupivacaine%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20abdominal%20hysterectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Choudhary,%20Jasmeen&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=176-181&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA592001487%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258152362&rft_id=info:pmid/31303705&rft_galeid=A592001487&rfr_iscdi=true