Loading…
Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy
Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In total, 126 fe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3 |
container_end_page | 181 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Choudhary, Jasmeen Mahajan, Rajesh Mahajan, Arti Gulati, Smriti Mehta, Anjali Nazir, Robina |
description | Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed.
Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P.
Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A592001487</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A592001487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1r2zAUhs3YWLtuf2AXwzAYu0mmD8u2bgYh--oodBfbboWsj1iJreNKdkP-3H7blKQtDYxhgcWr57zyOX6z7DVG8wIj-mENUg3z79eL5Q9BaSFw9SQ7J4TiGakoepqdI16hGcc1O8texLhGiKGKsOfZGcUU0Qqx8-zPEvpBBhfB52Dzy9_5KkjvohlDUqTXe2mQHXi409JqTQ9652XvVDww0fgIYXfY9zBCyJsO1CaXdjQhj4PzskuHJo6tiU7mWze2ebsbTGjS3SpvpsHdSiWdN7nz6b7RGT_GfPLahBU4v8plo6E_-LS7mFyNGqHfvcyeWdlF8-rufZH9-vL55_Lb7Or66-VycTVTJanirCZGclQZy0tMmrLgDUdSMSytJgVntbWMV0VJaE0arImusbZIaYQ45RXXll5kl0dfDXIthuB6GXYCpBMHAcJKyDA61RlhrbaYM8UJRQVmqmGG20JXpkw7VZXJ6-PRa5ia3miVOg2yOzE9PfGuFSu4FSXjNatZMnh_ZxDgZkpDFb2LynRdmjBMURDCaswITf1cZG-P6EqmT3PeQnJUe1wsGCcI4aKuEjX_B5UebdIvBm-sS_pJwbtHBa2R3dhG6KbRgY-nIDmCKkCMwdiHNjES-xCLQ4jF4xCnojePB_RQcp_aBHw6AlvoUhTippu2JojEbjxs_2OdVinuE0__AsuUC-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258152362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</creator><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed.
Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P.
Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31303705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Bupivacaine ; Comparative analysis ; granisetron ; Hysterectomy ; Original ; Palonosetron ; Phenols (Class of compounds) ; spinal anesthesia ; Surgery ; Women ; Women's health</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598585/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598585/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27439,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Arti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Smriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Anjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed.
Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P.
Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>granisetron</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Palonosetron</subject><subject>Phenols (Class of compounds)</subject><subject>spinal anesthesia</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1r2zAUhs3YWLtuf2AXwzAYu0mmD8u2bgYh--oodBfbboWsj1iJreNKdkP-3H7blKQtDYxhgcWr57zyOX6z7DVG8wIj-mENUg3z79eL5Q9BaSFw9SQ7J4TiGakoepqdI16hGcc1O8texLhGiKGKsOfZGcUU0Qqx8-zPEvpBBhfB52Dzy9_5KkjvohlDUqTXe2mQHXi409JqTQ9652XvVDww0fgIYXfY9zBCyJsO1CaXdjQhj4PzskuHJo6tiU7mWze2ebsbTGjS3SpvpsHdSiWdN7nz6b7RGT_GfPLahBU4v8plo6E_-LS7mFyNGqHfvcyeWdlF8-rufZH9-vL55_Lb7Or66-VycTVTJanirCZGclQZy0tMmrLgDUdSMSytJgVntbWMV0VJaE0arImusbZIaYQ45RXXll5kl0dfDXIthuB6GXYCpBMHAcJKyDA61RlhrbaYM8UJRQVmqmGG20JXpkw7VZXJ6-PRa5ia3miVOg2yOzE9PfGuFSu4FSXjNatZMnh_ZxDgZkpDFb2LynRdmjBMURDCaswITf1cZG-P6EqmT3PeQnJUe1wsGCcI4aKuEjX_B5UebdIvBm-sS_pJwbtHBa2R3dhG6KbRgY-nIDmCKkCMwdiHNjES-xCLQ4jF4xCnojePB_RQcp_aBHw6AlvoUhTippu2JojEbjxs_2OdVinuE0__AsuUC-Y</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creator><creator>Mahajan, Rajesh</creator><creator>Mahajan, Arti</creator><creator>Gulati, Smriti</creator><creator>Mehta, Anjali</creator><creator>Nazir, Robina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</title><author>Choudhary, Jasmeen ; Mahajan, Rajesh ; Mahajan, Arti ; Gulati, Smriti ; Mehta, Anjali ; Nazir, Robina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>granisetron</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Palonosetron</topic><topic>Phenols (Class of compounds)</topic><topic>spinal anesthesia</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Jasmeen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Arti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Smriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Anjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazir, Robina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choudhary, Jasmeen</au><au>Mahajan, Rajesh</au><au>Mahajan, Arti</au><au>Gulati, Smriti</au><au>Mehta, Anjali</au><au>Nazir, Robina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>176-181</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of two 5-HT3 serotonin receptor antagonists; granisetron and palonosetron on hemodynamics, sensory, and motor blockade induced by intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
Material and Methods: In total, 126 female patients (ASA I and II physical status) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine were randomly divided into three groups out of which 40 patients in each group were evaluated for final outcome. Group G received intravenous 1 mg granisetron, group P received intravenous palonosetron 0.075 mg, and group C received intravenous normal saline. Study drug was given 5 min before the spinal anesthesia. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, sensory and motor blockade were assessed.
Results: The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups. Time to reach peak sensory block and modified Bromage 3 motor block, time to two segmental regression of sensory block, and motor regression to modified Bromage score of 0 were not statistically different among the three groups. Although statistically significant early regression of sensory block to segment S1 was seen in group G as compared to group P and group C, it was of no clinical significance. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in group G and P.
Conclusion: Intravenous administration of granisetron and palonosetron before intrathecal bupivacaine does not attenuate the hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Further, both 5-HT3 receptors antagonists do not have clinically significant effects on the spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>31303705</pmid><doi>10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9185 |
ispartof | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.35 (2), p.176-181 |
issn | 0970-9185 2231-2730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ffdf195c9230415cb5e9f4d7e6b5ec76 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central |
subjects | Anesthesia Bupivacaine Comparative analysis granisetron Hysterectomy Original Palonosetron Phenols (Class of compounds) spinal anesthesia Surgery Women Women's health |
title | Comparison of IV granisetron and IV palonosetron on hemodynamics and sensory and motor block after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20IV%20granisetron%20and%20IV%20palonosetron%20on%20hemodynamics%20and%20sensory%20and%20motor%20block%20after%20spinal%20anesthesia%20with%20hyperbaric%20bupivacaine%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20abdominal%20hysterectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Choudhary,%20Jasmeen&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=176-181&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_334_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA592001487%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627s-82ea907ef9612b649b90ac51afd24958ff597462382b1d2d81df0cd0093979df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258152362&rft_id=info:pmid/31303705&rft_galeid=A592001487&rfr_iscdi=true |