Loading…

VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION

The validity of the display evaluative index technique was investigated in two separate studies. Both studies indicated adequate predictive validity for the technique. The ability of the technique to predict 'decision making' was found to be superior to its ability to predict 'informa...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Siegel, Arthur I, Federman, Philip J
Format:	Report
Language:	English
Subjects:	ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY CODING COLORS COMPUTER PROGRAMMING DECISION MAKING DISPLAY SYSTEMS EFFECTIVENESS Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE(HUMAN) PICTURES PREDICTIONS PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS Psychology STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TABLES(DATA)
Online Access:	Request full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator	Siegel, Arthur I Federman, Philip J
description	The validity of the display evaluative index technique was investigated in two separate studies. Both studies indicated adequate predictive validity for the technique. The ability of the technique to predict 'decision making' was found to be superior to its ability to predict 'information extraction' processes. Generally, it was found that pictorial type displays are superior to tabular displays for 'decision making;' no difference seemed manifest between the two display types for 'information extraction.' Adding appropriate color coding seemed to augment the ability of the user to employ display information. As fact density increased, display decision making scores decreased.
format	report
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0653209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD0653209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD06532093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHAKc_TxdHEM8fT3U_B3UwjxcFVwcfVUCHF19vDzDAx1VXDzD1LwcQxyd9UNdnb0Acp6Bgf4OEYquAI1hoL18TCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHFwMzU2MjA0tjAtIAM3EoAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Siegel, Arthur I ; Federman, Philip J</creator><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Arthur I ; Federman, Philip J ; APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES INC WAYNE PA</creatorcontrib><description>The validity of the display evaluative index technique was investigated in two separate studies. Both studies indicated adequate predictive validity for the technique. The ability of the technique to predict 'decision making' was found to be superior to its ability to predict 'information extraction' processes. Generally, it was found that pictorial type displays are superior to tabular displays for 'decision making;' no difference seemed manifest between the two display types for 'information extraction.' Adding appropriate color coding seemed to augment the ability of the user to employ display information. As fact density increased, display decision making scores decreased.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ; APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY ; CODING ; COLORS ; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ; DECISION MAKING ; DISPLAY SYSTEMS ; EFFECTIVENESS ; Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System ; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS ; PERFORMANCE(HUMAN) ; PICTURES ; PREDICTIONS ; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS ; Psychology ; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ; TABLES(DATA)</subject><creationdate>1967</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0653209$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Arthur I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federman, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES INC WAYNE PA</creatorcontrib><title>VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION</title><description>The validity of the display evaluative index technique was investigated in two separate studies. Both studies indicated adequate predictive validity for the technique. The ability of the technique to predict 'decision making' was found to be superior to its ability to predict 'information extraction' processes. Generally, it was found that pictorial type displays are superior to tabular displays for 'decision making;' no difference seemed manifest between the two display types for 'information extraction.' Adding appropriate color coding seemed to augment the ability of the user to employ display information. As fact density increased, display decision making scores decreased.</description><subject>ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE</subject><subject>APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY</subject><subject>CODING</subject><subject>COLORS</subject><subject>COMPUTER PROGRAMMING</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</subject><subject>EFFECTIVENESS</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System</subject><subject>MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</subject><subject>PICTURES</subject><subject>PREDICTIONS</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>STATISTICAL ANALYSIS</subject><subject>TABLES(DATA)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHAKc_TxdHEM8fT3U_B3UwjxcFVwcfVUCHF19vDzDAx1VXDzD1LwcQxyd9UNdnb0Acp6Bgf4OEYquAI1hoL18TCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHFwMzU2MjA0tjAtIAM3EoAw</recordid><startdate>196705</startdate><enddate>196705</enddate><creator>Siegel, Arthur I</creator><creator>Federman, Philip J</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196705</creationdate><title>VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION</title><author>Siegel, Arthur I ; Federman, Philip J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD06532093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE</topic><topic>APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY</topic><topic>CODING</topic><topic>COLORS</topic><topic>COMPUTER PROGRAMMING</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</topic><topic>EFFECTIVENESS</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System</topic><topic>MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</topic><topic>PICTURES</topic><topic>PREDICTIONS</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>STATISTICAL ANALYSIS</topic><topic>TABLES(DATA)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Arthur I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federman, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES INC WAYNE PA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siegel, Arthur I</au><au>Federman, Philip J</au><aucorp>APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES INC WAYNE PA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION</btitle><date>1967-05</date><risdate>1967</risdate><abstract>The validity of the display evaluative index technique was investigated in two separate studies. Both studies indicated adequate predictive validity for the technique. The ability of the technique to predict 'decision making' was found to be superior to its ability to predict 'information extraction' processes. Generally, it was found that pictorial type displays are superior to tabular displays for 'decision making;' no difference seemed manifest between the two display types for 'information extraction.' Adding appropriate color coding seemed to augment the ability of the user to employ display information. As fact density increased, display decision making scores decreased.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0653209
source	DTIC Technical Reports
subjects	ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY CODING COLORS COMPUTER PROGRAMMING DECISION MAKING DISPLAY SYSTEMS EFFECTIVENESS Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE(HUMAN) PICTURES PREDICTIONS PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS Psychology STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TABLES(DATA)
title	VALIDATION OF THE DEI TECHNIQUE FOR LARGE-SCALE DISPLAY EVALUATION
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=VALIDATION%20OF%20THE%20DEI%20TECHNIQUE%20FOR%20LARGE-SCALE%20DISPLAY%20EVALUATION&rft.au=Siegel,%20Arthur%20I&rft.aucorp=APPLIED%20PSYCHOLOGICAL%20SERVICES%20INC%20WAYNE%20PA&rft.date=1967-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD0653209%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD06532093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true