Air Force Conceptual Weapon System Optimization Model: Proof of Concept Study

The Air Force must be able to estimate the manpower, personnel, and training (MPI) resources required by the new or modified weapon systems proposed during the Concept Exploration phase of the acquisition process. A proof of concept study was conducted to determine whether data can be obtained to su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rue, Robert C, Rogers, Sandra G, Weaver, William M
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
ACQUISITION
ADVANCED WEAPONS
AIR FORCE PERSONNEL
AIR FORCE TRAINING
ARMY PERSONNEL
COLLECTION
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
COSTS
JET FIGHTERS
LOGISTICS SUPPORT
MANPOWER
METHODOLOGY
Military Forces and Organizations
Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics
PE62205F
Personnel Management and Labor Relations
REQUIREMENTS
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
TRAINING
WEAPON SYSTEMS
WUAL77191927
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Air Force must be able to estimate the manpower, personnel, and training (MPI) resources required by the new or modified weapon systems proposed during the Concept Exploration phase of the acquisition process. A proof of concept study was conducted to determine whether data can be obtained to support the system of models proposed for making the estimates and whether the estimates will provide a sound basis for comparing the MPT life-cycle costs of the proposed weapon systems. The study concentrated on one Air Force Specialty while comparing two alternative support concepts for the Advanced Tactical Fighter. The study used the Logistics Composite Model to estimate the manning requirements for the two alternatives. The study explored a methodology for gathering and analyzing data on training requirements and costs. The study modified the Army Manpower Cost System to estimate and compare the life-cycle costs of the two alternatives. Several appendices detail the analyses conducted to support the study. The study found that data exist or can be collected to support the system models, although some work remains to firm up the collection methodology. The study also found that the conceptual framework for the proposed system of models provides a sound basis for comparing proposed weapon systems.