Loading…

The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency

The protest process is a means of ensuring that the Government conducts procurements in accordance with statutory and regulatory procedures. Additionally, protests serve a vital role in assuring full and open competition in the federal acquisition process. Protests can be costly in many aspects, inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duncan, Eric C
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Duncan, Eric C
description The protest process is a means of ensuring that the Government conducts procurements in accordance with statutory and regulatory procedures. Additionally, protests serve a vital role in assuring full and open competition in the federal acquisition process. Protests can be costly in many aspects, including the direct costs of taking the action as well as more indirect costs such as program delays and damaged business relationships. The Government recognizes the negative impact protests have on the procurement process and has enacted several laws and regulations in an effort to reduce protest frequency and streamline procurement procedures. While it appears that the Government has made substantial efforts aimed at reducing protests, it becomes necessary to ask whether they were successful in their efforts. This study examined one such piece of legislation, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA), and found that there was an impact on particular contracting practices. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that protest frequency within the Air Force has decreased since FASA's implementation. This correlation suggests that FASA did have an impact on reducing the frequency of protests.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA329928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA329928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3299283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyrEKwjAUheEsDqK-gcN9gQ62DmYMatCtYGdLSG_rhTSxyS3i2xvE3enw852luDcPhOv4NJYh9MC5NHYYjQNlp5kSMQUPN45oRkee_JDh-91JuYdsdUhcqJeJHdQxMCYGHXGa0dv3Wix64xJufrsSW31ujpeiY7JtYvLIrTqpqpSyPFR_-APpwTfn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Duncan, Eric C</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Eric C ; AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH SCHOOL OF LOGISTICS AND ACQUIS ITION MANAGEMENT</creatorcontrib><description>The protest process is a means of ensuring that the Government conducts procurements in accordance with statutory and regulatory procedures. Additionally, protests serve a vital role in assuring full and open competition in the federal acquisition process. Protests can be costly in many aspects, including the direct costs of taking the action as well as more indirect costs such as program delays and damaged business relationships. The Government recognizes the negative impact protests have on the procurement process and has enacted several laws and regulations in an effort to reduce protest frequency and streamline procurement procedures. While it appears that the Government has made substantial efforts aimed at reducing protests, it becomes necessary to ask whether they were successful in their efforts. This study examined one such piece of legislation, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA), and found that there was an impact on particular contracting practices. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that protest frequency within the Air Force has decreased since FASA's implementation. This correlation suggests that FASA did have an impact on reducing the frequency of protests.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACQUISITION ; AWARDS ; CONTRACTS ; COSTS ; FASA(FEDERAL ACQUISITION STREAMLINING ACT) ; FEDERAL LAW ; Government and Political Science ; GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT ; LEGISLATION ; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><creationdate>1997</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27565,27566</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA329928$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH SCHOOL OF LOGISTICS AND ACQUIS ITION MANAGEMENT</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency</title><description>The protest process is a means of ensuring that the Government conducts procurements in accordance with statutory and regulatory procedures. Additionally, protests serve a vital role in assuring full and open competition in the federal acquisition process. Protests can be costly in many aspects, including the direct costs of taking the action as well as more indirect costs such as program delays and damaged business relationships. The Government recognizes the negative impact protests have on the procurement process and has enacted several laws and regulations in an effort to reduce protest frequency and streamline procurement procedures. While it appears that the Government has made substantial efforts aimed at reducing protests, it becomes necessary to ask whether they were successful in their efforts. This study examined one such piece of legislation, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA), and found that there was an impact on particular contracting practices. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that protest frequency within the Air Force has decreased since FASA's implementation. This correlation suggests that FASA did have an impact on reducing the frequency of protests.</description><subject>ACQUISITION</subject><subject>AWARDS</subject><subject>CONTRACTS</subject><subject>COSTS</subject><subject>FASA(FEDERAL ACQUISITION STREAMLINING ACT)</subject><subject>FEDERAL LAW</subject><subject>Government and Political Science</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>LEGISLATION</subject><subject>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFyrEKwjAUheEsDqK-gcN9gQ62DmYMatCtYGdLSG_rhTSxyS3i2xvE3enw852luDcPhOv4NJYh9MC5NHYYjQNlp5kSMQUPN45oRkee_JDh-91JuYdsdUhcqJeJHdQxMCYGHXGa0dv3Wix64xJufrsSW31ujpeiY7JtYvLIrTqpqpSyPFR_-APpwTfn</recordid><startdate>199709</startdate><enddate>199709</enddate><creator>Duncan, Eric C</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199709</creationdate><title>The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency</title><author>Duncan, Eric C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3299283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>ACQUISITION</topic><topic>AWARDS</topic><topic>CONTRACTS</topic><topic>COSTS</topic><topic>FASA(FEDERAL ACQUISITION STREAMLINING ACT)</topic><topic>FEDERAL LAW</topic><topic>Government and Political Science</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>LEGISLATION</topic><topic>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH SCHOOL OF LOGISTICS AND ACQUIS ITION MANAGEMENT</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, Eric C</au><aucorp>AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH SCHOOL OF LOGISTICS AND ACQUIS ITION MANAGEMENT</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency</btitle><date>1997-09</date><risdate>1997</risdate><abstract>The protest process is a means of ensuring that the Government conducts procurements in accordance with statutory and regulatory procedures. Additionally, protests serve a vital role in assuring full and open competition in the federal acquisition process. Protests can be costly in many aspects, including the direct costs of taking the action as well as more indirect costs such as program delays and damaged business relationships. The Government recognizes the negative impact protests have on the procurement process and has enacted several laws and regulations in an effort to reduce protest frequency and streamline procurement procedures. While it appears that the Government has made substantial efforts aimed at reducing protests, it becomes necessary to ask whether they were successful in their efforts. This study examined one such piece of legislation, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA), and found that there was an impact on particular contracting practices. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that protest frequency within the Air Force has decreased since FASA's implementation. This correlation suggests that FASA did have an impact on reducing the frequency of protests.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA329928
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ACQUISITION
AWARDS
CONTRACTS
COSTS
FASA(FEDERAL ACQUISITION STREAMLINING ACT)
FEDERAL LAW
Government and Political Science
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
LEGISLATION
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
title The Impact of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 on Post-Award Protest Frequency
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A09%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The%20Impact%20of%20the%20Federal%20Acquisition%20Streamlining%20Act%20of%201994%20on%20Post-Award%20Protest%20Frequency&rft.au=Duncan,%20Eric%20C&rft.aucorp=AIR%20FORCE%20INST%20OF%20TECH%20WRIGHT-PATTERSON%20AFB%20OH%20SCHOOL%20OF%20LOGISTICS%20AND%20ACQUIS%20ITION%20MANAGEMENT&rft.date=1997-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA329928%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3299283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true