Updated Erosion Modeling Predictions for the M829E3 Round

Erosion modeling predictions are given for the current M829E3 round configuration and weighted averages per temperature for the computer correction factor(CCF). Our gun erosion model was developed through a ten-year joint partnership with Software and Engineering Associates, Inc., Carson City, NV. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sopok, S, Pflegl, G, Rickard, C
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Ammunition and Explosives
AQ M03-0950
CCF(COMPUTER CORRECTION FACTOR)
COMPUTER PROGRAMS
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
CONFIGURATIONS
EROSION
EROSION MODELING
FIRING TESTS(ORDNANCE)
GASES
GUN BARRELS
Guns
KINETIC ENERGY PROJECTILES
M256 TANK CANNON
M829E3 KINETIC ENERGY ROUND
MEAN
NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING
PREDICTIONS
PROJECTILE WEIGHT
PROJECTILES
PROPELLANT CONFIGURATION
PROPELLANTS
VELOCITY
WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Erosion modeling predictions are given for the current M829E3 round configuration and weighted averages per temperature for the computer correction factor(CCF). Our gun erosion model was developed through a ten-year joint partnership with Software and Engineering Associates, Inc., Carson City, NV. These predictions are based on recent cannon characterization data. These latest predictions include significant changes in propellant configuration and projectile weight that were made to the current M829E3 configuration compared to our initially presented M829E3 modeling predictions two years ago. For the last two years, additional nonablative M829E3 erosion modeling predictions have not been conducted or presented. This was due to a diversion of erosion modeling resources toward ablative M829E3 erosion predictions and erosion predictions related to the selection of six M256 cannons for M829E3-related fatigue testing. For the current M829E3 configuration, these changes in gas pressure. gas temperature, gas velocity, and increased projectile weight collectively contributed to a predicted increase in M256 cannon erosion life compared to our initially presented M829E3 modeling effort. In addition, the current set of M829E3 weighted averages per temperature for CCF from Fort Knox (19% hot 49 degrees C/120 degrees F, 64% basic 21 degrees C/70 degrees F, 16% cold -7 degrees C/20 degrees F, and 1% severe -32 degrees C/-25 degrees F) collectively contributed to a further predicted increase in M256 cannon erosion life compared to the two-year-old set of weighted averages per temperature (33% hot, 33% basic, 0% cold, and 33% severe). For the current predictions, the peak eroded cannon axial position remains at approximately 60 inches from the rear face of the tube plus or 6 inches; and this position dictates the erosion life of the cannon. Presented at the JANNAF Combustion Meeting (38th), Destin, FL, on 8-12 Apr 2002.